Skip to main content
Log in

Independent risk factors for adverse events associated with propofol-based pediatric sedation performed by anesthesiologists in the radiology suite: a prospective observational study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the types and frequencies of adverse events, as well as the risk factors for respiratory complications related to pediatric sedation. This single-center, prospective, observational study was conducted in a radiology suite at a tertiary university hospital for 2 years. Patients aged under 18 years, who underwent sedation solely by anesthesiologists for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans, were eligible for inclusion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out to identify the risk factors of adverse events, including respiratory complications, related to the propofol-based sedation. We further performed a sensitivity test with 1-to-5 propensity score matching analysis to assess the robustness of our findings. Among 2569 children, 3.9% experienced respiratory problems related to the sedation. After 1-to-5 propensity matching analysis, cardiac and neurologic comorbidities, crying before sedation, a history of snoring or upper respiratory infection, and prolonged duration of sedation were independently associated with the occurrence of adverse respiratory events.

Conclusions: Our protocol for pediatric sedation demonstrates a high success rate and low likelihood of fatal complications, but proactive management prior to propofol-based sedation is critical to prevent adverse respiratory events in children.

What is Known:

Propofol-based pediatric sedation is associated with adverse events necessarily even though performed by professional anesthesiologists solely.

What is New:

Cardiac and neurologic comorbidities, crying before sedation, a history of snoring or upper respiratory infection, and prolonged duration of sedation were independently associated with the occurrence of respiratory adverse events.

Proactive management prior to sedation is critical to preventing adverse respiratory events for pediatrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

We provided our data as an electronic supplemental material.

Abbreviations

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

CIs:

Confidence intervals

CT:

Computed tomography

ICU:

Intensive care unit

LMA:

Laryngeal mask airway

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NPO:

Nil per os

OR:

Odds ratio

PSAU:

Pediatric Sedation and Anesthesia Unit

UMSS:

University of Michigan Sedation Scale

URI:

Upper respiratory infection

References

  1. Srinivasan M, Turmelle M, Depalma LM, Mao J, Carlson DW (2012) Procedural sedation for diagnostic imaging in children by pediatric hospitalists using propofol: analysis of the nature, frequency, and predictors of adverse events and interventions. J Pediatr 160:801–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Eldevik OP, Rockwell DT, Wong JH, Tait AR (2000) Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: adverse events and outcomes. Br J Anaesth 84:743–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cote CJ, Wilson S (2006) Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update. Pediatrics 118:2587–2602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cote CJ, Wilson S (2008) Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update. Paediatr Anaesth 18:9–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cravero JP, Blike GT (2004) Review of pediatric sedation. Anesth Analg 99:1355–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jayabose S, Levendoglu-Tugal O, Giamelli J et al (2001) Intravenous anesthesia with propofol for painful procedures in children with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 23:290–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Festa M, Bowra J, Schell D (2002) Use of propofol infusion in Australian and New Zealand paediatric intensive care units. Anaesth Intensive Care 30:786–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Guenther E, Pribble CG, Junkins EP Jr, Kadish HA, Bassett KE, Nelson DS (2003) Propofol sedation by emergency physicians for elective pediatric outpatient procedures. Ann Emerg Med 42:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cravero JP, Beach ML, Blike GT, Gallagher SM, Hertzog JH (2009) The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia with propofol for procedures outside the operating room: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Anesth Analg 108:795–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pena BM, Krauss B (1999) Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 34:483–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cote CJ, Karl HW, Notterman DA, Weinberg JA, McCloskey C (2000) Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. Pediatrics 106:633–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman GM, Nowakowski R, Troshynski TJ, Berens RJ, Weisman SJ (2002) Risk reduction in pediatric procedural sedation by application of an American Academy of Pediatrics/American Society of Anesthesiologists process model. Pediatrics 109:236–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR, Merkel S, Tremper K, Naughton N (2002) Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: validity and reliability of the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Br J Anaesth 88:241–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maxwell LG, Yaster M (1996) The myth of conscious sedation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 150:665–667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. White PF, Song D (1999) New criteria for fast-tracking after outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with the modified Aldrete’s scoring system. Anesth Analg 88:1069–1072

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Selbst SM (2000) Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors. Pediatrics 105:864–865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mason KP, Sanborn P, Zurakowski D et al (2004) Superiority of pentobarbital versus chloral hydrate for sedation in infants during imaging. Radiology 230:537–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR (1997) Adverse events and risk factors associated with the sedation of children by nonanesthesiologists. Anesth Analg 85:1207–1213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Delgado J, Toro R, Rascovsky S et al (2015) Chloral hydrate in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of a 10-year sedation experience administered by radiologists. Pediatr Radiol 45:108–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pershad J, Wan J, Anghelescu DL (2007) Comparison of propofol with pentobarbital/midazolam/fentanyl sedation for magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in children. Pediatrics 120:e629–e636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bloomfield EL, Masaryk TJ, Caplin A et al (1993) Intravenous sedation for MR imaging of the brain and spine in children: pentobarbital versus propofol. Radiology 186:93–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Frankville DD, Spear RM, Dyck JB (1993) The dose of propofol required to prevent children from moving during magnetic resonance imaging. Anesthesiology 79:953–958

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Barbi E, Gerarduzzi T, Marchetti F et al (2003) Deep sedation with propofol by nonanesthesiologists: a prospective pediatric experience. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157:1097–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Green SM, Roback MG, Krauss B et al (2009) Predictors of airway and respiratory adverse events with ketamine sedation in the emergency department: an individual-patient data meta-analysis of 8,282 children. Ann Emerg Med 54:158–168 e1-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mallory MD, Baxter AL, Kost SI (2009) Propofol vs pentobarbital for sedation of children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: results from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Paediatr Anaesth 19:601–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel KN, Simon HK, Stockwell CA et al (2009) Pediatric procedural sedation by a dedicated nonanesthesiology pediatric sedation service using propofol. Pediatr Emerg Care 25:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vespasiano M, Finkelstein M, Kurachek S (2007) Propofol sedation: intensivists’ experience with 7304 cases in a children’s hospital. Pediatrics 120:e1411–e1417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pershad J, Godambe SA (2004) Propofol for procedural sedation in the pediatric emergency department. J Emerg Med 27:11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Milius EM, Papademetrious TR, Heitlinger LA (2012) Retrospective review of propofol dosing for procedural sedation in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 17:246–251

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Grunwell JR, McCracken C, Fortenberry J et al (2014) Risk factors leading to failed procedural sedation in children outside the operating room. Pediatr Emerg Care 30:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kiringoda R, Thurm AE, Hirschtritt ME et al (2010) Risks of propofol sedation/anesthesia for imaging studies in pediatric research: eight years of experience in a clinical research center. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 164:554–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gross JB, Bachenberg KL, Benumof JL et al (2006) American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management. Practice guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 104:1081–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Memtsoudis S, Liu SS, Ma Y et al (2011) Perioperative pulmonary outcomes in patients with sleep apnea after noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 112:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaw R, Pasupuleti V, Walker E, Ramaswamy A et al (2012) Postoperative complications in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 141:436–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fernanda B, Henrique A, Jana A et al (2016) Incidence of adverse events in paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 6:e011384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bhatt M, Kennedy RM, Osmond MH et al (2009) Consensus-based recommendations for standardizing terminology and reporting adverse events for emergency department procedural sedation and analgesia in children. Ann Emerg Med 53:426–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JRL contributed to conceive study design, acquire and interpret study data, draft the manuscript, and revise the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. JHL conceived the study and drafted the manuscript. HML acquired study data. NK interpreted study data. MHK substantially contributed to conceive study design; acquire, analyze, and interpret study data; draft the manuscript; and revise the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work, thereby ensured that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work were appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myoung Hwa Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Our study was approved by the Institute Research Committee of Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System (IRB number: 4-2012-0688) and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01855555).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

N/A

Code availability

N/A

Additional information

Communicated by Peter de Winter

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, JR., Lee, J.H., Lee, HM. et al. Independent risk factors for adverse events associated with propofol-based pediatric sedation performed by anesthesiologists in the radiology suite: a prospective observational study. Eur J Pediatr 180, 1413–1422 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03916-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03916-w

Keywords

Navigation