Abstract
This was a retrospective study documenting all pacemaker implantations (PMIs) secondary to postoperative atrioventricular block. A total of 26 patients were included between 2011 and 2020. The incidence rate was 1.8%, with a median follow-up time of 4.5 years. At the time of the initial PMI, the median weight was 5 kg, and the median generator longevity was 45 months. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamp times were significantly longer among surgeries complicated with PMI (P≤ 0.05). Trisomy 21 patients were 4 times more likely to need a PMI (95% CI 1.8–9, P < 0.001). The mean Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgery scores were higher in patients with PMI. All initial PMIs were epicardial (18 single chamber). Most patients underwent ventricular septal defect closure (isolated or complex), except for 5 patients who underwent left-sided surgery. Pacing-induced dilated cardiomyopathy occurred in 3 patients. All implanted leads were functional except for 2 leads with high thresholds and another biventricular system infection. There was a 31% rate of pacing reintervention.
Conclusion: PMI resulted in significant morbidity but without mortality. The highest risk for PMI was left ventricular outflow tract repair, trisomy 21, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic cross times.
What is Known: •Incidence rate for postoperative atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker was at 1.8%, similar to previously published reports. •Longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were associated with higher risk for developing postoperative persistent atrioventricular block. What is New: •Incidence for persistent atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker was highest among left ventricular outflow tract surgery at 8.6%. •Following all intracardiac repair, Down syndrome patients were 4 times more likely to need a pacemaker implantation compared to the non-syndromic group. |
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ACC:
-
Aortic cross-clamp
- ASD:
-
Atrial septal defect
- AVB:
-
Atrioventricular block
- AVSD:
-
Atrioventricular Septal Defect
- CDH:
-
Chest Disease Hospital
- CHD:
-
Congenital Heart Disease
- CPB:
-
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
- CRTP:
-
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacemaker
- DCM:
-
Dilated Cardiomyopathy
- DORV:
-
Double Outlet Right Ventricle
- d-TGA:
-
D-Transposition of Great Arteries
- LAI:
-
Left Atrial Isomerism
- LAVV:
-
Left Atrioventricular Valve
- l-TGA:
-
L-Malposed Great Arteries
- LVOT:
-
Left Ventricular Outflow Tract
- m:
-
Months
- PG:
-
Pacemaker Generator
- PMI:
-
Pacemaker Implantation
- POD:
-
Postoperative Day
- RACHS:
-
Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery
- RV:
-
Right Ventricle
- STS:
-
Society of Thoracic Surgery
- TOF:
-
Tetralogy of Fallot
- TV:
-
Tricuspid Valve
- VSD:
-
Ventricular Septal Defect
- wk:
-
Week
References
Romer AJ, Tabbutt S, Etheridge S, Fischbach P, Ghanayem N, Reddy V, Sahulee R, Tanel R, Tweddell J, Gaies M, Banerjee M, Retzloff L, Zhang W, Patel A (2019) Atrioventricular block after congenital heart surgery: analysis from the pediatric cardiac critical care consortium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 157:1168–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.142
Roberto C d S, Martino M, Tetsuji T, Sartori C, Pinho M (2005) Permanent cardiac pacing in children with postoperative bradycardia: long-term follow-up. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 20:392–397. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76382005000400007
Sachweh J, Vazquez-Jimenez J, Schöndube F, Daebritz S, Dörge H, Mühler E, Messmer B (2000) Twenty years experience with pediatric pacing: epicardial and transvenous stimulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00364-x
Edwin F, Aniteye E, Tettey M, Sereboe L, Kotei D, Tamatey M, Entsua-Mensah K, Frimpong-Boateng K (2010) Permanent complete heart block following surgical correction of congenital heart disease. Ghana Med J 44:109–114. https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v44i3.68894
Smerup M, Hjertholm T, Johnsen S, Pedersen A, Hansen P, Mortensen P, Hansen O, Hjortdal V (2005) Pacemaker implantation after congenital heart surgery: risk and prognosis in a population-based follow-up study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 28:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.04.007
Weindling S, Saul J, Gamble W, Mayer J, Wessel D, Walsh E (1998) Duration of complete atrioventricular block after congenital heart disease surgery. Am J Cardiol 82:525–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00375-0
Batra A, Wells W, Hinoki K, Stanton R, Silka M (2003) Late recovery of atrioventricular conduction after pacemaker implantation for complete heart block associated with surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125:1291–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00198-3
Kawashima T, Sasaki H (2005) A macroscopic anatomical investigation of atrioventricular bundle locational variation relative to the membranous part of the ventricular septum in elderly human hearts. Surg Radiol Anat 27:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0302-7
Friedman DM, Duncanson LJ, Glickstein J, Buyon JP (2003) A review of congenital heart block. Images Paediatr Cardiol 5:36–48 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3232542/
Tucker E, Pyles L, Bass J, Moller J (2007) Permanent pacemaker for atrioventricular conduction block after operative repair of perimembranous ventricular septal defect. JACC 50:1196–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.014
Fudge J, Li S, Jaggers J, O’Brien S, Peterson E, Jacobs J, Welke K, Jacobs M, Li J, Pasquali S (2010) Outcomes following congenital heart surgery in down syndrome patients: analysis of a national clinical database. Pediatrics 126:315–322. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-3245
Epstein A, DiMarco JP, Ellenbogen K, Estes M III, Freedman R, Gettes L, Gillinov A, Gregoratos G, Hammill S, Hayes DL, Hlatky M, Newby L, Page R, Schoenfeld M, Silka M, Stevenson L, Sweeney M (2009) ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices). J Am Coll Cardiol 117:e350–e408. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCUALTIONAHA.108.189742
Papadopoulos N, Rouhollapour A, Kleine P, Moritz A, Bakhtiary F (2010) Long-term follow-up after steroid-eluting epicardial pacemaker implantation in young children: a single centre experience. Europace 12:540–543. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq37
Wilhelm BJ, Thöne M, El-Scheich T, Livert D, Angelico R, Osswald B (2015) Complications and risk assessment of 25 years in pediatric pacing. Ann Thorac Surg 100:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.098
Aellig NC, Balmer C, Dodge-Khatami A, Rahn M, Prêtre R, Bauersfeld U (2007) Long-term follow-up after pacemaker implantation in neonates and infants. Ann Thoracic 83:1420–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.11.042
Bakhtiary F, Dzemali O, Bastanier C, Moritz A, Kleine P (2007) Medium-term follow-up and modes of failure following epicardial pacemaker implantation in young children. Europace 9:94–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eul172
Balaji S, Sreeram N (2017) The development of pacing induced ventricular dysfunction is influenced by the underlying structural heart defect in children with congenital heart disease. Indian Heart J 69:240–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.11.325
Matsuhisa H, Oshima Y, Maruo A, Hasegawa T, Tanaka A, Noda R, Iwaki R, Matsushima S, Tanaka T, Kido S (2014) Pacing therapy in children – repeat left ventricular pacing for preservation of ventricular function. Circ J 78:2972–2978. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-14-053
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MAE, conceptualization, methodology, ethics paperwork, article drafting, revision, concept, and design; (2) HKA, ethics paperwork, literature search, and data collection; (3) RSA, ethics paperwork and data collection; (4) ZLM, ethics paperwork and data collection; (5) MAB, statistical analysis; (6) AAS, statistical analysis; (7) MAE, critical revision of article; and (8) VGL, critical revision of article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Communicated by Peter de Winter
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ebrahim, M.A., Ashkanani, H.K., Alramzi, R.S. et al. Pacemaker implantation post congenital heart disease surgical repair: tertiary center experience. Eur J Pediatr 179, 1867–1872 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03739-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-020-03739-9