Pyogenic sacroiliitis in children: don’t forget the very young
Pyogenic sacroiliitis (PS) is rare with less than 100 pediatric cases reported in the medical literature. To better characterize PS in the pediatric population, we investigated a series of children presenting with PS. Retrospective data analysis was done at an academic tertiary center between the years of 2000 and 2017. All hospitalized children ≤ 16 years of age with PS were evaluated. Of the 894 children hospitalized with osteoarticular infections, 18 were diagnosed with PS (2%) and are included in the review. Two clinically distinct groups were identified. PS in infants (n = 13, 72.2%, mean age 1.1 years) had an indolent course and a faster recovery without any bacterial source identified. In contrast, the group of older children (n = 5, 27.8%, mean age 11.6 years) had a more complicated course and a higher rate of identified bacterial infections.
What is Known:
• Pediatric pyogenic sacroiliitis is an extremely rare condition usually caused by Staphylococcus aureus with highest incidence in adolescents.
• The diagnosis of PS is challenging due to its rarity and difficulty in assessing the sacroiliac joint.
What is New:
• We describe an under-recognized entity of PS in infants with a mild clinical course, without invasive complications and with fast recovery that differ from “classical” septic sacroiliitis.
• Infants with fever, irritability, decreased range of motion in the pelvic area and pain during diapering should raise clinical suspicion of this diagnosis.
KeywordsOsteoarticular infections Osteomyelitis Septic arthritis Infants Kingella kingae Staphylococcus aureus
Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The Institutional Review Board of Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center approved the study protocol (0140-15-HMO August 2015). Oral informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study prior to phone interview.
EL, AGH & YB designed the study, collected and analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. NS, DA and IW provided substantial contribution to draft the paper and reviewed the final manuscript. All authors gave their final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
- 7.Leroux J, Bernardini I, Grynberg L, Grandguillaume C, Michelin P, Ould Slimane M, Nectoux E, Deroussen F, Gouron R, Angelliaume A, Ilharreborde B, Renaux-Petel M (2015) Pyogenic sacroiliitis in a 13-month-old child: a case report and literature review. Medicine 94(42):e1581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.McMullan BJ, Andresen D, Blyth CC, Avent ML, Bowen AC, Britton PN, Clark JE, Cooper CM, Curtis N, Goeman E, Hazelton B, Haeusler GM, Khatami A, Newcombe JP, Osowicki J, Palasanthiran P, Starr M, Lai T, Nourse C, Francis JR, Isaacs D, Bryant PA, ANZPID-ASAP group (2016) Antibiotic duration and timing of the switch from intravenous to oral route for bacterial infections in children: systematic review and guidelines. Lancet Infect Dis 16(8):e139–ee52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.McNeil JC, Kaplan SL, Vallejo JG (2017) The influence of the route of antibiotic administration, methicillin susceptibility, vancomycin duration and serum trough concentration on outcomes of pediatric Staphylococcus aureus bacteremic osteoarticular infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 36(6):572–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar