Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Knowledge and practices regarding infant vaccination: results of a survey of French physicians

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 April 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

A prospective, observational, survey of pediatricians and general practitioners (GPs) was conducted to assess pediatric vaccination knowledge and practices. The survey was distributed by email to 1069 pediatricians and 1700 GPs and completed by 151 pediatricians (14.1%) and 201 GPs (11.8%). Knowledge of the vaccination calendar was very good (99% overall). Of the respondents, 98% were confident in vaccine efficacy. Eight-one percent of pediatricians and 62% of GPs agreed that recommended vaccinations should become obligatory; all prescribed hexavalent vaccines often or always. More pediatricians (88%) than GPs (75%) used anti-pyretics; the use of anesthetic cream/patches was similar in each group (79% and 75%, respectively). The ambience at vaccination was considered to be important by both groups, and was disturbed in 37% of cases. Seventy percent of pediatricians and 57% of GPs agreed that vaccine reconstitution (e.g., Hib pellet) is a complicating factor: overall, 28% reported occasionally omitting to reconstitute a pentavalent or hexavalent vaccine in error, and 60% reported having not fully reconstituted the vaccine. Almost all (93%) considered non-reconstitution as an important error.

Conclusion: Overall, adherence to good vaccination practices was good, although errors in reconstitution were reported by physicians. These problems would be minimized by wider use of fully liquid vaccines.

What is Known:

• Pediatric vaccination schedules are crowded.

• Good vaccination practices and the use of multivalent vaccines are essential to maintain good compliance to pediatric vaccination recommendations.

What is New:

• Overall good compliance to good vaccination practices by both pediatricians and GPs in France.

• Omission of pentavalent or hexavalent vaccine reconstitution of Hib pellet and incomplete reconstitution reported by pediatricians/GPs. Awareness of pediatricians/GPs that omission and incomplete reconstitution are important errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 23 April 2019

    The above article originally published with an error present in the abstract section.

Abbreviations

aP:

Acellular pertussis

D:

Diphtheria

GP:

General practitioner

Hib:

Haemophilus influenzae type b

HB:

Hepatitis B

IPV:

Inactivated poliovirus

PRP~T:

Hib polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus protein

T:

Tetanus

USA:

United States of America

References

  1. 200 grands médecins s'engagent en faveur de la vaccination obligatoire (200 senior doctors support obligatory vaccination) [French]. Le Parisien (2017) Available from: http://www.leparisien.fr/societe/200-grands-medecins-s-engagent-en-faveur-de-la-vaccination-obligatoire-28-06-2017-7095930.php. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  2. Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Medicament et des Produits de Santé Informations sur la reconstitution adéquate du vaccin Infanrix®hexa [French] (2003) Available from: http://ansm.sante.fr/S-informer/Informations-de-securite-Lettres-aux-professionnels-de-sante/Informations-sur-la-reconstitution-adequate-du-vaccin-INFANRIX-R-HEXA. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2018) Immunization schedules: 2018 recommended immunizations for infants and children (birth through 6 years) in easy-to-read format. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/easy-to-read/child-easyread.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  4. Das RR, Panigrahi I, Naik SS (2014) The effect of prophylactic antipyretic administration on post-vaccination adverse reactions and antibody response in children: a systematic review. PLoS One 9(9):e106629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. De Coster I, Fournie X, Faure C, Ziani E, Nicolas L, Soubeyrand B et al (2015) Assessment of preparation time with fully-liquid versus non-fully liquid paediatric hexavalent vaccines. A time and motion study. Vaccine 33(32):3976–3982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). Recommendations for practitioners to prevent vaccine errors Part 2: analysis of ISMP vaccine errors reporting program (ISMP VERP) Available from: https://www.ismp.org/resources/recommendations-practitioners-prevent-vaccine-errors-part-2-analysis-ismp-vaccine-errors. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  7. Kalies H, Grote V, Verstraeten T, Hessel L, Schmitt HJ, von Kries R (2006) The use of combination vaccines has improved timeliness of vaccination in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 25(6):507–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kroger AT, Duchin, J, Vázquez M(2017) General best practice guidelines for immunization. Best Practices Guidance of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip-recs/general-recs/downloads/general-recs.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  9. Lyseng-Williamson KA, McCormack PL (2013) DTaP-IPV-Hep B-Hib vaccine (Hexyon®/Haxacima®): a guide to its use in the primary and booster vaccination of infants and toddlers in Europe. Drugs Ther Perspect 29(11):329–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marshall GS, Happe LE, Lunacsek OE, Szymanski MD, Woods CR, Zahn M, Russell A (2007) Use of combination vaccines is associated with improved coverage rates. Pediatr Infect Dis J 26(6):496–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCormack PL (2013) DTaP-IPV-Hep B-Hib vaccine (Hexaxim®): a review of its use in primary and booster vaccination. Paediatr Drugs 15(1):59–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyerhoff A, Jacobs RJ, Greenberg DP, Yagoda B, Castles CG (2004) Clinician satisfaction with vaccination visits and the role of multiple injections, results from the COVISE study (combination vaccines impact on satisfaction and epidemiology). Clin Pediatr (Phila) 43(1):87–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Plotkin SA, Liese J, Madhi SA, Ortiz E (2011) A DTaP-IPV//PRP~T vaccine (Pentaxim): a review of 16 years' clinical experience. Expert Rev Vaccines 10(7):981–1005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sante Publique France. Elargissement de l'obligation vaccinale à 11 maladies: un enjeu de santé publique [French] (2017) Available from: http://inpes.santepubliquefrance.fr/10000/themes/vaccination/pdf/Dossier-Pedagogique-Obligation-vaccinale070717.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  15. Taddio A, Nulman I, Goldbach M, Ipp M, Koren G (1994) Use of lidocaine-prilocaine cream for vaccination pain in infants. J Pediatr 124(4):643–648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Uhari M (1993) A eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine for alleviating vaccination pain in infants. Pediatrics 92(5):719–721

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Woodin KA, Rodewald LE, Humiston SG, Carges MS, Schaffer SJ, Szilagyi PG (1995) Physician and parent opinions. Are children becoming pincushions from immunizations? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 149(8):845–849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zepp F, Schmitt HJ, Cleerbout J, Verstraeten T, Schuerman L, Jacquet JM (2009) Review of 8 years of experience with Infanrix hexa (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib hexavalent vaccine). Expert Rev Vaccines 8(6):663–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Andrew Lane (Lane Medical Writing), funded by Sanofi Pasteur, for the assistance with the production of this manuscript in accordance with the European Medical Writers Association guidelines and Good Publication Practice.

Funding

This study was funded by Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PK acted as coordinators for the study participants and were involved in the design of the survey, data collection, data interpretation, and review and approval of the manuscript.

BV acted as coordinators for the study participants and were involved in the design of the survey, data collection, data interpretation, and review and approval of the manuscript.

CB was involved in the design of the survey, data interpretation, and review and approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Bakhache.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

PB and BV are members of some advisory groups on vaccination practices; invited participant to medical congresses by Sanofi and Merck Sharp & Dohme; and invited participant to continuing medical education congresses and symposia by Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. CB is an employee of IFOP, a polling and market research institute that conducts projects on behalf of various stakeholders, including life science companies. This particular project was funded by Sanofi Pasteur.

Informed consent

Informed consent is not applicable as patients were not included in the study, which was a survey of general practitioners and pediatricians.

Additional information

Communicated by Nicole Ritz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakhache, P., Virey, B. & Bienenfeld, C. Knowledge and practices regarding infant vaccination: results of a survey of French physicians. Eur J Pediatr 178, 533–540 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-03314-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-03314-3

Keywords

Navigation