Support for smoke-free cars when children are present: a secondary analysis of 164,819 U.S. adults in 2010/2011
- 259 Downloads
Comprehensive smoke-free legislations prohibiting smoking in indoor areas of workplaces, bars, and restaurants have been adopted in most of the USA; however, limited efforts have focused on regulating secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in the family car. The objective of this study was to identify the determinants and national/state-specific population support for smoke-free cars, in the presence of any occupant in general, but particularly when children are present. National data of US adults aged ≥18 years (n = 164,819) were obtained from the 2010/2011 Tobacco Use Supplement of the Current Population Survey. Among all US adults, a significantly greater proportion supported smoke-free cars when it was specified that the occupant was a child compared to when not specified (93.4 vs. 73.7 %, p < 0.05). Age, race/ethnicity, gender, current tobacco use, marital status, and the existence of household smoke-free regulations all mediated population support for smoke-free cars. Conclusion: While differences within the US population were noted, this study however showed overwhelming support for smoke-free car policies, particularly when children are present. Policies which prohibit smoking in indoor or confined areas such as cars may benefit public health by protecting nonsmoking children and adults from involuntary SHS exposure.
KeywordsSecondhand smoke Tobacco control Cars Children Exposure
- 95 % CI
95 % confidence intervals
Tobacco use supplement of the current population survey
Dr. Israel Agaku initiated the reported research while affiliated with the Center for Global Tobacco Control at Harvard University. He is currently affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Office on Smoking and Health. The research in this report was completed and submitted outside of the official duties of his current position and does not reflect the official policies or positions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
There was no direct or indirect source of funding for the reported research.
Conflict of interest
None to declare.
- 1.Action on Smoking and Health (2014) Smoking in cars. Fact sheet. Retrieved from http://ash.org.uk/files/documents/ASH_714.pdf
- 4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013) State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System. Legislation – Smokefree Indoor AirPersonal Vehicles – OSH 2013 - 3rd Quarter. Retrieved from http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/statesystem/ComparisonReport/ComparisonReports.aspx?TopicID = 600&MeasureID = 642&MeasureSeq = 1
- 6.Global Advisors on Smokefree Policy (2014) Smoke-free vehicles when children are present. Retrieved from http://www.njgasp.org/f_SF%20cars,kids,%20info,%20arguments.pdf
- 13.Matt GE, Romero R, Ma DS, Quintana PJ, Hovell M, Donohue M, Messer K, Salem S, Aguilar M, Boland J, Cullimore J, Crane M, Junker J, Tassinario P, Timmermann V, Wong K, Chatfield D (2008) Tobacco use and asking prices of used cars: prevalence, costs, and new opportunities for changing smoking behaviour. Tob Induc Dis 4:2PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Murphy-Hoefer R, Madden P, Maines D, Coles C (2014) Prevalence of smoke-free car and home rules in Maine before and after passage of a smoke-free vehicle law, 2007–2010. Prev Chron Dis 11:130–132Google Scholar
- 15.National Cancer Institute (2013) Tobacco Use Supplement Current Population Survey. Retrieved from http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/studies/tus-cps/TUS-CPS_fact_sheet.pdf
- 16.Nguyen HV (2014) Effectiveness of bans against smoking in private vehicles in Canada. Report card on cancer in Canada, 2012-13. Retrieved from http://www.canceradvocacy.ca/reportcard/2013/Effectiveness%20of%20Bans%20Against%20Smoking%20Inside%20Private%20Vehicles%20in%20Canada.pdf
- 19.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2006) The health consequences of involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke: a report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coordinating Center for Health Promotion, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 20.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2014) The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 23.Vardavas CI, Fthenou E, Patelarou E, Bagkeris E, Murphy S, Hech SS, Connolly GN, Chatzi L, Kogevinas M (2013) Exposure to different sources of second-hand smoke during pregnancy and its effect on urinary cotinine and tobacco-specific nitrosamine (NNAL) concentrations. Tob Control 22:194–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.World Health Organization (2003) WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/9241591013.pdf?ua = 1