Skip to main content
Log in

An audit of first afebrile seizure management in an Irish tertiary pediatric setting

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the first afebrile seizure management with internationally recognized standards in an Irish tertiary pediatric setting. Twenty-one management standards were derived from a combination of British (NICE 2004) and North American (AAN 2003) guidelines. Cases of first afebrile seizure presenting to a pediatric emergency department between July 2007 and June 2010 were assessed against the standards. On completion, the standards developed were presented to the relevant stakeholders, a nurse-developed parental advice sheet was introduced, and a re-audit was performed from July 2010 to June 2011. Forty children were identified in the initial audit period (A1) and 41 over the re-audit (A2). No case achieved full compliance with the devised standards in the audit period. A median compliance score of 15 (range 5–20) was achieved in A1 and 17 (range 11–21) in A2 [mean rank 31.93 versus 49.85; p(1,1) < 0.0001]. Optimal compliance (total score of ≥17) with devised standards was achieved in 6/40 patients in A1 and in 21/41 patients in A2 [χ 2 = 11.95; p(1,1) = 0.001]. Conclusion: We demonstrated an initial lack of compliance with international guidelines on management of a common medical presentation, first afebrile seizure, and demonstrated that improvements can be achieved by identification of appropriate standards and critical appraisal of the compliance with these standards through both formal and informal education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Adams SM, Knowles PD (2007) Evaluation of a first seizure. Am Fam Physician 75(9):1342–1347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anand G, Jayawant S, McShane T, Pike M (2011) It is all in the history, or is it? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 97(1):17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bautovich T, Numa A (2012) Role of head computed tomography in the evaluation of children admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit with new-onset seizure. Emerg Med Australas 24(3):313–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernhard MK, Glaser A, Ulrich K, Merkenschlager A (2010) Is there a need for ophthalmological examinations after a first seizure in paediatric patients? Eur J Pediatr 169(1):31–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dayan PS, Lillis K, Bennett J, Conners G, Bailey P, Callahan J, Akman C, Feldstein N, Hauser WA, Kuppermann N (2011) Interobserver agreement in the assessment of clinical findings in children with first unprovoked seizures. Pediatrics 127(5):e1266–e1271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeman JM (2003) Less testing is needed in the emergency room after a first afebrile seizure. Pediatrics 111(1):194–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirtz D, Ashwal S, Berg A, Bettis D, Camfield C, Camfield P et al (2000) Practice parameter: evaluating a first nonfebrile seizure in children: report of the quality standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, The Child Neurology Society, and The American Epilepsy Society. Neurology 55(5):616–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. NICE Guideline on Epilepsy (CG20) (2004) The epilepsies: the diagnosis and management of the epilepsies in adults and children in primary and secondary care. October. Guideline Point 1.8.26C

  9. O’Gorman C, Ziedan Y, O’Neill M (2007) An evaluation of Medline published paediatric audits from 1966 to 1999. Arch Dis Child 92:309–311

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramet J (2011) A pallid paroxysmal event in children: it is vagal anoxic seizure, it is treatable, and it is not “epilepsy”. Eur J Pediatr 170(12):1617–1618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rauch DA, Carr E, Harrington J (2008) Inpatient brain MRI for new-onset seizures: utility and cost effectiveness. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 47(5):457–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharieff GQ, Hendry PL. Afebrile pediatric seizures. Emerg Med Clin North Am. Feb;29(1):95–108

  13. Sharma S, Riviello JJ, Harper MB, Baskin MN (2003) The role of emergent neuroimaging in children with new-onset afebrile seizures. Pediatrics 111(1):1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL, O’Dell C, Alemany M, Newstein D et al (1996) The risk of seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked afebrile seizure in childhood: an extended follow-up. Pediatrics 98(2 Pt 1):216–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soto-Ares G, Jissendi Tchofo P, Szurhaj W, Trehan G, Leclerc X (2004) Management of patients after a first seizure. J Neuroradiol 31(4):281–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Webb DW, Coleman H, Fielder A, Kennedy CR (1998) An audit of pediatric epilepsy care. Arch Dis Child 79(2):145–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest in this study and that no funding was provided for its undertaking.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Boyle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyle, M., Chukwu, J., Boyle, M. et al. An audit of first afebrile seizure management in an Irish tertiary pediatric setting. Eur J Pediatr 173, 525–528 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-013-2180-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-013-2180-7

Keywords

Navigation