Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatricians’ working conditions in German hospitals: a real-time task analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surveys of pediatricians in Germany report low levels of job satisfaction. Preferably, such subjective reports should be corroborated by objective data regarding physicians’ working conditions. However, such data in the field of pediatrics could not be found in the scientific literature. The aim of the present observational field study was to collect exact data about pediatricians’ workflow in different pediatric hospital departments to evaluate and to optimize work routines. Data of 697 working hours were collected by using Tablet PCs during weekday shifts at three urban German hospitals. Twenty-five pediatricians were observed separately. A pediatrician’s workday lasted on average 9 h and 18 min (SD = 0:53:44 h). The following amount of time was spent on various job tasks within this period: 29.80% (SD = 8.25 %) on meetings, 17.54% (SD = 6.51%) on documentation duties, 12.65% (SD = 3.73%) on indirect patient care, 9.22 % (SD = 5.74%) on hospital admissions and ward rounds and 4.03% (SD = 2.49%) on direct patient care. This is the first objective task analysis of physicians’ workflow in pediatric hospital wards. Some of the physicians’ self-reported problems were verified. Improvements in work organization and a new allocation of responsibilities among the medical staff may prove helpful in improving the quality of patient care by reducing the burden on pediatricians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alderton M, Callen J (2007) Are general practitioners satisfied with electronic discharge summaries? HIM J 1:7–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Lavelle M et al (2003) A cross-site qualitative study of physician order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2:188–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Dykstra R, Fournier L (2003) Implementing computerized physician order entry: the importance of special people. Int J Med Inform 2–3:235–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosley W (1991) Career satisfaction in pediatrics. Pediatrics 5:743–744

    Google Scholar 

  5. Braun B, Buhr P, Klinke S, Müller R, Rosenbrock R (2008) Die Begleitforschung zur DRG-Einführung: Außer Spesen nichts gewesen. Dtsch Arztebl 14:A732–A735

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dearden A, Smithers M, Thapar A (1996) Interruptions during general practice consultations—the patients’ view. Family practice 2:166–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duffy R, Richard G (2006) Physician job satisfaction across six major specialties. J Vocat Behav 3:548–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eyrolle H, Cellier JM (2000) The effects of interruptions in work activity: field and laboratory results. Appl Ergon 5:537–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flintrop J (2006) Auswirkungen der DRG-Einführung: Die ökonomische Logik wird zum Maß der Dinge. Dtsch Arztebl 46:A-3082–3085

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fukui S, Ogawa K, Ohtsuka M, Fukui N (2008) A randomized study assessing the efficacy of communication skill training on patients’ psychologic distress and coping: nurses’ communication with patients just after being diagnosed with cancer. Cancer 6:1462–1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Galinsky E, Phillips D (1988) The day-care debate. Parents 1:114–115

    Google Scholar 

  12. Janus K, Amelung VE, Gaitanides M, Schwartz FW (2007) German physicians “on strike”-shedding light on the roots of physician dissatisfaction. Health Policy 3:357–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Langewitz W, Conen D, Nübling M, Weber H (2002) Communication matters—deficits in hospital care from the patients’ perspective. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 8:348–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mache S, Scutaru C, Vitzthum K et al (2008) Development and evaluation of a computer-based medical work assessment programme. J Occup Med Toxicol 3:35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rottenfußer R (1999) Studie zur Arbeitszufriedenheit der Vertragsärzte: Viele Kassenärzte fühlen sich ausgebrannt. Dtsch Arztebl 96(10): A-610/B-497/C-469

  16. Thyen U, Sperner J, Morfeld M, Meyer C, Ravens-Sieberer U (2003) Unmet health care needs and impact on families with children with disabilities in Germany. Ambul Pediatr 2:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ulich E (2005) Arbeitspsychologie. Schäffer-Poeschel, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank all physicians who participated in this study for their time and cooperation. We also thank Lindy Musial-Bright for language editing. This study was supported by the Institution for Statutory Accident Insurance in the Health and Welfare Services.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Mache.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mache, S., Vitzthum, K., Kusma, B. et al. Pediatricians’ working conditions in German hospitals: a real-time task analysis. Eur J Pediatr 169, 551–555 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-009-1065-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-009-1065-2

Keywords

Navigation