Evaluation of the Omron MX3 Plus monitor for blood pressure measurement in adolescents
- 308 Downloads
This study analyzed the accuracy/agreement of the Omron MX3 monitor on 165 adolescents. Blood pressure was measured by the automatic monitor connected in Y with the mercury column (three consecutive and simultaneous measures). The independent measures were analyzed, and the mean differences between systolic and diastolic measures for both methods were calculated and compared with British Hypertension Society (BHS) and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) criteria. The automatic monitor received the highest degree of BHS recommendations for systolic and diastolic blood pressures according to the BHS. The median (25th and 75th) difference between the observer and the monitor measurements was −2 (−6 and 1) mmHg for systolic and 0 (−3 and1) mmHg for diastolic pressures. The monitor also satisfies the AAMI standard for the studied population. In conclusion, the Omron MX3 Plus monitor can be considered reliable and valid for clinical practice and is in accordance with BHS and AAMI criteria.
KeywordsBlood pressure Validation Adolescents
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest in this paper.
- 3.Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (1993) American national standard. Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. AAMI, Arlington, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cooper RS, Wolf-Maier K, Luke A et al (2005) An international comparative study of blood pressure in populations of European vs. African descent. BMC Med [electronic resource] 3Google Scholar
- 10.Gordon CC, Chumlea WC, Roche AF (1988) Stature, recumbent length and weight. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorel R (eds) Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, pp 3–8Google Scholar
- 15.O’Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA et al (1993) The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 11(Suppl 2):43–62Google Scholar
- 18.Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ et al (2005) Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 45:142–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Nasothimiou EG, Protogerou AD (2008) Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring. J Hum Hypertens 22:796–800. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.70 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Thorogood M, Connor M, Tollman S et al (2007) A cross-sectional study of vascular risk factors in a rural South African population: data from the Southern African Stroke Prevention Initiative (SASPI). BMC Public Health 13:317–326Google Scholar
- 23.VII JNC (2003) Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood PressureGoogle Scholar
- 26.Zaetta V, Daniele L, Perkovic D et al (2007) Validation of the SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the European Society of Hypertension, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the British Society of Hypertension. Blood Press Monit 12:363–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar