Advertisement

European Journal of Pediatrics

, 168:1349 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Omron MX3 Plus monitor for blood pressure measurement in adolescents

  • Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro
  • Juliano Casonatto
  • Marcos Doederlein PolitoEmail author
  • Jefferson Rosa Cardoso
  • Rômulo Fernandes
  • Débora Alves Guariglia
  • Aline Mendes Gerage
  • Arli Ramos de Oliveira
Original Paper

Abstract

This study analyzed the accuracy/agreement of the Omron MX3 monitor on 165 adolescents. Blood pressure was measured by the automatic monitor connected in Y with the mercury column (three consecutive and simultaneous measures). The independent measures were analyzed, and the mean differences between systolic and diastolic measures for both methods were calculated and compared with British Hypertension Society (BHS) and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) criteria. The automatic monitor received the highest degree of BHS recommendations for systolic and diastolic blood pressures according to the BHS. The median (25th and 75th) difference between the observer and the monitor measurements was −2 (−6 and 1) mmHg for systolic and 0 (−3 and1) mmHg for diastolic pressures. The monitor also satisfies the AAMI standard for the studied population. In conclusion, the Omron MX3 Plus monitor can be considered reliable and valid for clinical practice and is in accordance with BHS and AAMI criteria.

Keywords

Blood pressure Validation Adolescents 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there is no conflict of interest in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Alpert BC (1996) Validation of CAS model 9010 automated blood pressure monitor:children/adult and neonatal studies. Blood Press Monit 1:69–73PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altunkan S, Ilman N, Kayatürk N, Altunkan E (2007) Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the international protocol in adults and obese adults. Blood Press Monit 12:219–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (1993) American national standard. Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. AAMI, Arlington, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barker ME, Shiell AW, Law CM (2000) Evaluation of the Dinamap 8100 and Omron M1 blood pressure monitors for use in children. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 14:179–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barquera S, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Luke A et al (2008) Hypertension in Mexico and among Mexican Americans: prevalence and treatment patterns. J Hum Hypertens 9:617–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coleman A, Freeman P, Steel S, Shennan A (2005) Validation of the Omron MX3 Plus oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the European Society of Hypertension international protocol. Blood Press Monit 10:165–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper RS, Wolf-Maier K, Luke A et al (2005) An international comparative study of blood pressure in populations of European vs. African descent. BMC Med [electronic resource] 3Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Din-Dzietham R, Liu Y, Bielo MV, Shamsa F (2007) High blood pressure trends in children and adolescents in national surveys, 1963 to 2002. Circulation 116:1488–1496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Furusawa EA, Ruiz MF, Saito MI, Koch VH (2005) Evaluation of the Omron 705-CP blood pressure measuring device for use in adolescents and young adults. Arq Bras Cardiol 84:367–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gordon CC, Chumlea WC, Roche AF (1988) Stature, recumbent length and weight. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorel R (eds) Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Human Kinetics Books, Champaign, pp 3–8Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ling J, Ohara Y, Orime Y et al (1995) Clinical evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor in adults and children based on the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standards. J Clin Monit 11:123–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McGavock JM, Torrance B, McGuire KA et al (2007) The relationship between weight gain and blood pressure in children and adolescents. Am J Hypertens 20:1038–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nijdam ME, Plantinga Y, Hulsen HT et al (2008) Pulse pressure amplification and risk of cardiovascular disease. Am J Hypertens 21:388–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W (1990) The British Hypertension society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens 8:607–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA et al (1993) The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 11(Suppl 2):43–62Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L et al (2003) European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 21:821–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perloff D, Grim C, Flack J et al (1993) Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry. Circulation 88:2460–2470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ et al (2005) Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 45:142–161PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sinha MD, Reid CJ (2007) Evaluation of blood pressure in children. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 16:577–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stergiou GS, Tzamouranis D, Nasothimiou EG, Protogerou AD (2008) Can an electronic device with a single cuff be accurate in a wide range of arm size? Validation of the Visomat Comfort 20/40 device for home blood pressure monitoring. J Hum Hypertens 22:796–800. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2008.70 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stergiou GS, Yiannes NG, Rarra VC (2006) Validation of the Omron 705 IT oscillometric device for home blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents: the Arsakion School Study. Blood Press Monit 11:229–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thorogood M, Connor M, Tollman S et al (2007) A cross-sectional study of vascular risk factors in a rural South African population: data from the Southern African Stroke Prevention Initiative (SASPI). BMC Public Health 13:317–326Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    VII JNC (2003) Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood PressureGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wattigney WA, Webber LS, Lawrence MD, Berenson GS (1996) Utility of an automatic instrument for blood pressure measurement in children. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Hypertens 9:256–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wong SN, Tz Sung RY, Leung LC (2006) Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Blood Press Monit 11:281–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zaetta V, Daniele L, Perkovic D et al (2007) Validation of the SAA-102 home blood pressure monitor according to the protocols of the European Society of Hypertension, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the British Society of Hypertension. Blood Press Monit 12:363–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro
    • 1
  • Juliano Casonatto
    • 1
  • Marcos Doederlein Polito
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jefferson Rosa Cardoso
    • 1
  • Rômulo Fernandes
    • 2
  • Débora Alves Guariglia
    • 1
  • Aline Mendes Gerage
    • 1
  • Arli Ramos de Oliveira
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physical EducationUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaLondrinaBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Physical EducationUniversidade Estadual PaulistaPresidente PrudenteBrazil

Personalised recommendations