Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic performance of a rapid antigen test for RSV in comparison with a 19-valent multiplex RT-PCR ELISA in children with acute respiratory tract infections

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 02 September 2008

Abstract

A rapid and reliable diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in childhood is very important for clinical management. In this study we compared a rapid antigen test (enzyme immunoassay, EIA) for the detection of RSV with a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [19-valent multiplex RT-PCR enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)] to assess the diagnostic performance. Furthermore the diagnostic value of the EIA in terms of age and season relation was analyzed. A total of 400 nasopharyngeal or tracheal secretions from pediatric patients with clinical signs of lower respiratory tract infection were included. The specimen had to be taken in a standardized manner within 72 h after admission. Specimens were tested in parallel with the EIA and the multiplex RT-PCR ELISA. The RT-PCR technique was used as the target assay. The EIA reached a sensitivity of 58% and a specificity of 90% for all samples tested. For patients > 1 year the post-test probability for a positive EIA was 91% during the RSV season; a negative test result decreased disease probability from 53 to 25%. For older patients a positive test raised disease probability from 23 to 45% during the RSV season. Negative test results did not markedly change disease probability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dominguez EA, Taber LH, Couch RB (1993) Comparison of rapid diagnostic techniques for respiratory syncytial and influenza A virus respiratory infections in young children. J Clin Microbiol 31:2286–2290

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gröndahl B, Puppe W, Hoppe A, Kuhne I, Weigl JA, Schmitt HJ (1999) Rapid identification of nine microorganisms causing acute respiratory tract infections by single-tube multiplex reverse transcription-PCR: feasibility study. J Clin Microbiol 37 (1):1–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall CB, Douglas RG Jr, Geiman JM (1976) Respiratory syncytial virus infections in infants: quantitation and duration of shedding. J Pediatr 89:11–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson FW, Collier AM, Clyde WA Jr, Denny FW (1979) Respiratory-syncytial-virus infections, reinfections and immunity. A prospective, longitudinal study in young children. N Engl J Med 300:530–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krasinski K, LaCouture R, Holzman RS, Waithe E, Bonk S, Hanna B (1990) Screening for respiratory syncytial virus and assignment to cohort at admission to reduce nosocomial transmission. J Pediatr 116:894–898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krilov LR, Lipson SM, Barone SR, Kaplan MH, Ciamcian Z, Harkness SH (1994) Evaluation of a diagnostic test for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV): potential for bedside diagnosis. Pediatrics 93:903–906

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Madge P, Paton JY, McColl JH, Mackie PL (1992) Prospective controlled study of four infection-control procedures to prevent nosocomial infection with respiratory syncytial virus. Lancet 340:1079–1083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Parrott RH, Kim HW, Brandt CD, Chanock RW (1974) Respiratory syncytial virus in infants and children. Prev Med 3:473–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Puppe W, Weigl JAI, Aron G, Gröndahl B, Schmitt HJ, Niesters HGM, Groen J (2004) Evaluation of a multiplex reverse transcriptase PCR ELISA for the detection of nine respiratory tract pathogens. J Clin Virol 30:165–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schauer U, Rieger CH (2002) Behandlung von Kindern mit RSV-Infektionen: eine restrospektive Analyse der Saison 1998/1999. Klin Padiatr 214:37–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schauer U, Ihorst G, Rohwedder A, Petersen G, Berner R, Frank HD, Forster J, Stephan V (2006) Evaluation of respiratory virus detection by rapid antigen test in childhood. Klin Padiatr. 24 Jul (http://www.thieme-connect.de/ejournals/search)

  12. Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB (1991) Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol 44:763–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Simoes EA (1999) Respiratory syncytial virus infection. Lancet 354:847–852

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van den Hoogen BG, de Jong JC, Groen J, Kuiken T, de Groot R, Fouchier RA, Osterhaus AD (2001) A newly discovered human pneumovirus isolated from young children with respiratory tract disease. Nat Med 7:719–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weigl JA, Puppe W, Meyer CU, Berner R, Forster J, Schmitt HJ, Zepp F (2005) RSV-prevention in children guided by a web-based early warning system. Klin Padiatr 217:47–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weigl JAI, Puppe W, Meyer CU, Berner R, Forster J, Zepp F, Schmitt HJ (2004) PID-ARI.net and year-round surveillance of 19 respiratory pathogens in children. Clin Microbiol Infect 10(Suppl 3):210 (179–273)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson SD, Dahl BB, Wells RD (2002) An evidence-based clinical pathway for bronchiolitis safely reduces antibiotic overuse. Am J Med Qual 17:195–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the excellent technical assistance of the two microbiologic laboratories involved, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Germany and University Children’s Hospital Mainz, Germany.

This work received support from the Bundesministerium für Forschung (BMBF) for “PID-ARI.net,” a pediatric infectious disease network on acute respiratory tract infections.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Berner.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-008-0805-z

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schützle, H., Weigl, J., Puppe, W. et al. Diagnostic performance of a rapid antigen test for RSV in comparison with a 19-valent multiplex RT-PCR ELISA in children with acute respiratory tract infections. Eur J Pediatr 167, 745–749 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0581-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-007-0581-1

Keywords

Navigation