Presenting phenotype in 100 children with the 22q11 deletion syndrome
The aim of this study was to investigate and describe the presenting phenotype of children with the 22q11 deletion syndrome and to describe common clinical features that could serve as guidelines in the clinical diagnostic process preceding genetic testing. A hospital-based study of 100 consecutive children and adolescents with 22q11 deletion was initiated. The patients were divided into two groups according to age at diagnosis: before or after 2 years of age. Clinical features were grouped into a core set of eight features: cardiac defects, non-visible/hypoplastic thymus or infection problems, hypocalcaemia, feeding difficulties, cleft palate/speech-language impairment, developmental delay/learning difficulties, characteristic dysmorphic features and other malformations and deformities. The median age at diagnosis was 6.7 years. Of all patients, 26% were diagnosed in infancy and 92% had a congenital cardiac defect, whereas 54% of those diagnosed later had a cardiac defect. A cleft palate was present in 25 cases and 44 had some other malformation or deformity. All presented with a combination of many of the core features. Of those diagnosed after 2 years of age, the majority presented with speech-language impairment, developmental delay or learning difficulties and recurrent infections. Characteristic mild dysmorphic features were noticed in all children. Conclusion: In spite of variable clinical expression, children with 22q11 deletion share a number of major features and have a characteristic phenotype. A high proportion have no cardiac defect and hence a risk of diagnostic delay. Increased awareness and knowledge among general paediatricians and other specialists who meet these children early in life is needed to reduce the diagnostic delay.
Keywords22q11 deletion DiGeorge syndrome Phenotype Practice guidelines Velocardiofacial syndrome
22q11 deletion syndrome
fluorescent in-situ hybridisation
ventricular septal defect
This work was supported by grants from the Göteborg Medical Society, Göteborg University, The National Board of Health and Welfare and the Western Götaland Region. We are grateful to all patients and parents who participated in this study. Special thanks are given to Viola Reinhardt for highly valued assistance.
- 2.Devriendt K, Fryns JP, Mortier G (1998) The annual incidence of DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome (letter). J Med Genet 35: 789Google Scholar
- 6.McDonald-McGinn DM, Kirschner R, Goldmuntz E, Sullivan K, Eicher P, Gerdes M, Moss E, Solot C, Wang P, Jacobs I, Handler S, Knightly C, Heher K, Wilson M, Ming JE, Grace K, Driscoll D, Pasquariello P, Randall P, Larossa D, Emanuel BS, Zackai EH (1999) The Philadelphia story: the 22q11.2 deletion: report on 250 patients. Genet Couns 10: 11–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Óskarsdottir S, Vujic M, Fasth A (2004) Incidence and prevalence of the 22q11 deletion syndrome: a population-based study in Western Sweden. Arch Dis Child 89: 148–151Google Scholar
- 13.Ryan AK, Goodship JA, Wilson DI, Philip N, Levy A, Seidel H, Schuffenhauer S, Oechsler H, Belohradsky B, Prieur M, Aurias A, Raymond FL, Clayton-Smith J, Hatchwell E, McKeown C, Beemer FA, Dallapiccola B, Novelli G, Hurst JA, Ignatius J, Green AJ, Winter RM, Brueton L, Brondum-Nielsen K, Scambler PJ et al (1997) Spectrum of clinical features associated with interstitial chromosome 22q11 deletions: a European collaborative study. J Med Genet 34: 798–804PubMedGoogle Scholar