Brain Structure and Function

, Volume 224, Issue 1, pp 149–157 | Cite as

TMS of the occipital face area modulates cross-domain identity priming

  • Géza Gergely AmbrusEmail author
  • Catarina Amado
  • Laura Krohn
  • Gyula Kovács
Original Article


Accumulating evidence suggests that besides its function in early facial feature processing, the role of the right occipital face area (rOFA) extends to higher level, image-independent processing. Recent studies hint at the possibility that the activity of this region can be modulated by semantic information as well. To test whether the OFA is sensitive to semantic information in a functionally relevant way, we implemented a cross-domain, name-face priming paradigm combined with state-dependent transcranial magnetic stimulation, whereby stimulation preferentially facilitates the processing of attributes encoded by less active neural populations. Our volunteers performed a familiarity decision task for target face images preceded by primes that were either the name of the same identity (congruent), a name of a different person (incongruent), or the character string ‘XXXXX’ (no prime). Stimulating the rOFA at target stimulus onset, we observed the disappearance of the behavioral disadvantage of incongruent primes, compared to the vertex control condition. Performance in the congruent and no prime conditions remained intact. This result suggests the existence of neural populations in the rOFA that take part in the semantic processing of identity, probably in interplay with other nodes in the extended face network.


Transcranial magnetic stimulation Face perception Priming Familiarity Occipital face area 



The authors would like to thank Sophie-Marie Rostalski, Ricarda Budny, and Lisa Röhrig for their assistance in participant recruitment and data collection, and Maria Dotzer for the helpful discussion on the topic.


This work was supported by a Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant (KO 3918/5-1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


  1. Amado C, Kovács P, Mayer R et al (2018) Neuroimaging results suggest the role of prediction in cross-domain priming. Sci Rep 8:10356. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrus GG, Dotzer M, Schweinberger SR, Kovács G (2017a) The occipital face area is causally involved in the formation of identity-specific face representations. Brain Struct Funct. Google Scholar
  3. Ambrus GG, Windel F, Burton AM, Kovács G (2017b) Causal evidence of the involvement of the right occipital face area in face-identity acquisition. Neuroimage 148:212–218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews S, Jenkins R, Cursiter H, Burton AM (2015) Telling faces together: learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances. Q J Exp Psychol 68:2041–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anzellotti S, Fairhall SL, Caramazza A (2014) Decoding representations of face identity that are tolerant to rotation. Cereb Cortex. Google Scholar
  6. Axelrod V, Yovel G (2015) Successful decoding of famous faces in the fusiform face area. PLoS One. Google Scholar
  7. Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A et al (1996) Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci. Google Scholar
  8. Bouhali F, Schotten MT de, Pinel P et al (2014) Anatomical connections of the visual word form area. J Neurosci 34:15402–15414. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouvier SE, Engel SA (2006) Behavioral deficits and cortical damage loci in cerebral achromatopsia. Cereb Cortex 16:183–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruce V, Valentine T (1985) Identity priming in the recognition of familiar faces. Br J Psychol 76:373–383. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burton AM, Kelly SW, Bruce V (1998) Cross-domain repetition priming in person recognition. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A 51:515–529. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burton AM, Jenkins R, Schweinberger SR (2011) Mental representations of familiar faces. Br J Psychol 102:943–958. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cattaneo Z, Silvanto J (2008a) Investigating visual motion perception using the transcranial magnetic stimulation-adaptation paradigm. Neuroreport 19:1423–1427. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cattaneo Z, Silvanto J (2008b) Time course of the state-dependent effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the TMS-adaptation paradigm. Neurosci Lett 443:82–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cattaneo Z, Rota F, Vecchi T, Silvanto J (2008) Using state-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex: a comparison of TMS-priming and TMS-adaptation paradigms. Eur J Neurosci 28:1924–1929. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cattaneo Z, Rota F, Walsh V et al (2009) TMS-adaptation reveals abstract letter selectivity in the left posterior parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex 19:2321–2325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cattaneo Z, Devlin JT, Salvini F et al (2010) The causal role of category-specific neuronal representations in the left ventral premotor cortex (PMv) in semantic processing. Neuroimage 49:2728–2734. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cattaneo Z, Bona S, Silvanto J (2012) Cross-adaptation combined with TMS reveals a functional overlap between vision and imagery in the early visual cortex. Neuroimage 59:3015–3020. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chwilla DJ, Brown CM, Hagoort P (1995) The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology. Google Scholar
  20. Cohen L, Dehaene S, Naccache L et al (2000) The visual word form area. Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain. Google Scholar
  21. Cohen L, Lehéricy S, Chochon F et al (2002) Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. Brain. Google Scholar
  22. Collins JA, Koski JE, Olson IR (2016) More than meets the eye: the merging of perceptual and conceptual knowledge in the anterior temporal face area. Front Hum Neurosci. Google Scholar
  23. Dehaene S, Le Clec’H G, Poline J-B et al (2002) The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. Neuroreport. Google Scholar
  24. Dricot L, Sorger B, Schiltz C et al (2008) The roles of “face” and “non-face” areas during individual face perception: Evidence by fMRI adaptation in a brain-damaged prosopagnosic patient. Neuroimage 40:318–332. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duchaine B, Yovel G (2015) A revised neural framework for face processing. Annu Rev Vis Sci 1:393–416. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Engell AD, Kim NY, McCarthy G (2018) Sensitivity to faces with typical and atypical part configurations within regions of the face-processing network: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 30:963–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Anderson AW et al (1999) Activation of the middle fusiform’face area’increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat Neurosci 2:568–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ghuman AS, Brunet NM, Li Y et al (2014) Dynamic encoding of face information in the human fusiform gyrus. Nat Commun 5:5672. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilaie-Dotan S, Malach R (2007) Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas. Cereb Cortex. Google Scholar
  30. Goesaert E, Op de Beeck HP (2013) Representations of facial identity information in the ventral visual stream investigated with multivoxel pattern analyses. J Neurosci. Google Scholar
  31. Grill-Spector K, Henson RN, Martin A (2006) Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci 10:14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gschwind M, Pourtois G, Schwartz S et al (2012) White-matter connectivity between face-responsive regions in the human brain. Cereb Cortex 22:1564–1576. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guntupallia SJ, Wheelera KG, Gobbini IM (2016) Disentangling the representation of identity from head view along the human face processing pathway. bioRxiv. Google Scholar
  34. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI (2000) The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci 4:223–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henson RNA (2003) Neuroimaging studies of priming. Prog Neurobiol 70:53–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holcomb PJ, Neville HJ (1990) Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: a comparison using event-related brain potentials. Lang Cogn Process. Google Scholar
  37. Jemel B, Pisani M, Rousselle L et al (2005) Exploring the functional architecture of person recognition system with event-related potentials in a within-and cross-domain self-priming of faces. Neuropsychologia 43:2024–2040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jonas J, Descoins M, Koessler L et al (2012) Focal electrical intracerebral stimulation of a face-sensitive area causes transient prosopagnosia. Neuroscience 222:281–288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jonas J, Rossion B, Krieg J et al (2014) Intracerebral electrical stimulation of a face-selective area in the right inferior occipital cortex impairs individual face discrimination. Neuroimage 99:487–497. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jonas J, Rossion B, Brissart H et al (2015) Beyond the core face-processing network: Intracerebral stimulation of a face-selective area in the right anterior fusiform gyrus elicits transient prosopagnosia. Cortex 72:140–155. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jonas J, Brissart H, Hossu G, Colnat-Coulbois S (2017) A face identity hallucination (palinopsia) generated by intracerebral stimulation of the face-selective right lateral fusiform cortex. Cortex 32:1–43Google Scholar
  42. Kadosh KC, Walsh V, Kadosh RC (2011) Investigating face-property specific processing in the right OFA. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 6:58–65. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kriegeskorte N, Formisano E, Sorger B, Goebel R (2007) Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Google Scholar
  44. Kriegstein K von, Kleinschmidt A, Sterzer P, Giraud A-L (2005) Interaction of face and voice areas during speaker recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 17:367–376. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Matsumoto A, Iidaka T, Haneda K et al (2005) Linking semantic priming effect in functional MRI and event-related potentials. Neuroimage. Google Scholar
  46. Mattavelli G, Cattaneo Z, Papagno C (2011) Transcranial magnetic stimulation of medial prefrontal cortex modulates face expressions processing in a priming task. Neuropsychologia 49:992–998. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Natu V, O’Toole AJ (2011) The neural processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces: a review and synopsis. Br J Psychol 102(4):726–747. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nestor A, Plaut DC, Behrmann M (2011) Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Google Scholar
  49. Nobre AC, McCarthy G (1994) Language-related ERPs: scalp distributions and modulation by word type and semantic priming. J Cogn Neurosci. Google Scholar
  50. Peirce JW (2009) Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Front Neuroinform. Google Scholar
  51. Perini F, Cattaneo L, Carrasco M, Schwarzbach JV (2012) Occipital TMS has an activity-dependent suppressive effect. J Neurosci 32:12361–12365. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pitcher D, Walsh V, Yovel G, Duchaine B (2007) TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Curr Biol 17:1568–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pitcher D, Garrido L, Walsh V, Duchaine BC (2008) Transcranial magnetic stimulation disrupts the perception and embodiment of facial expressions. J Neurosci 28:8929–8933. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pitcher D, Goldhaber T, Duchaine B et al (2012) Two critical and functionally distinct stages of face and body perception. J Neurosci 32:15877–15885. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pitcher D, Duchaine B, Walsh V (2014) Combined TMS and fMRI reveal dissociable cortical pathways for dynamic and static face perception. Curr Biol 24:2066–2070. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pyles JA, Verstynen TD, Schneider W, Tarr MJ (2013) Explicating the face perception network with white matter connectivity. PLoS One. Google Scholar
  57. Renzi C, Vecchi T, Silvanto J, Cattaneo Z (2011) Overlapping representations of numerical magnitude and motion direction in the posterior parietal cortex: a TMS-adaptation study. Neurosci Lett 490:145–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rossion B (2008) Constraining the cortical face network by neuroimaging studies of acquired prosopagnosia. Neuroimage 40:423–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rossion B (2014) Understanding face perception by means of prosopagnosia and neuroimaging. Front Biosci Elit 6 E:258–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rossion B, Caldara R, Seghier M et al (2003) A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain 126:2381–2395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rotshtein P, Henson RNRNa, Treves A et al (2005) Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nat Neurosci 8:107–113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schiltz C, Sorger B, Caldara R et al (2006) Impaired face discrimination in acquired prosopagnosia is associated with abnormal response to individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus. Cereb Cortex 16:574–586. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schweinberger SR, Neumann MF (2016) Repetition effects in human ERPs to faces. Cortex 80:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schweinberger SR, Pickering EC, Burton AM, Kaufmann JM (2002) Human brain potential correlates of repetition priming in face and name recognition. Neuropsychologia 40:2057–2073. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Silvanto J (2008) State-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 21:1–10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Silvanto J, Cattaneo Z (2017) Common framework for “virtual lesion” and state-dependent TMS: the facilitatory/suppressive range model of online TMS effects on behavior. Brain Cogn 119:32–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Silvanto J, Pascual-Leone A (2008) State-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topogr 21:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Silvanto J, Muggleton NG, Cowey A, Walsh V (2007) Neural adaptation reveals state-dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Eur J Neurosci 25:1874–1881. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Silvanto J, Bona S, Cattaneo Z (2017) Initial activation state, stimulation intensity and timing of stimulation interact in producing behavioral effects of TMS. Neuroscience 363:134–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Spence C (2011) Crossmodal correspondences: a tutorial review. Atten Percept Psychophys 73:971–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steeves JKE, Culham JC, Duchaine BC et al (2006) The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area. Neuropsychologia 44:594–609. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thesen T, McDonald CR, Carlson C et al (2012) Sequential then interactive processing of letters and words in the left fusiform gyrus. Nat Commun 3:1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Trapp S, Schweinberger SR, Hayward WG, Kovács G (2018) Integrating predictive frameworks and cognitive models of face perception. Psychon Bull Rev. 1–8Google Scholar
  74. Van Den Hurk J, Gentile F, Jansma BM (2011) What’s behind a face: person context coding in fusiform face area as revealed by multivoxel pattern analysis. Cereb Cortex. Google Scholar
  75. Verosky SC, Todorov A, Turk-Browne NB (2013) Representations of individuals in ventral temporal cortex defined by faces and biographies. Neuropsychologia. Google Scholar
  76. Vilsten JS, Mundy ME (2014) Imaging early consolidation of perceptual learning with face stimuli during rest. Brain Cogn 85:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weibert K, Andrews TJ (2015) Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia. Google Scholar
  78. Weibert K, Harris RJ, Mitchell A et al (2016) An image-invariant neural response to familiar faces in the human medial temporal lobe. Cortex. Google Scholar
  79. Wiese H, Schweinberger SR (2008) Event-related potentials indicate different processes to mediate categorical and associative priming in person recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34:1246–1263. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wiese H, Schweinberger SR (2011) Accessing semantic person knowledge: temporal dynamics of nonstrategic categorical and associative priming. J Cogn Neurosci. Google Scholar
  81. Willenbockel V, Sadr J, Fiset D et al (2010) Controlling low-level image properties: the SHINE toolbox. Behav Res Methods 42:671–684. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Xu X, Biederman I (2010) Loci of the release from fMRI adaptation for changes in facial expression, identity, and viewpoint. J Vis 10:1–13. Google Scholar
  83. Zhen Z, Fang H, Liu J (2013) The hierarchical brain network for face recognition. PLoS One. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biological Psychology and Cognitive Neurosciences, Institute of PsychologyFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.Experimental Cognitive ScienceEberhard Karls Universität TübingenTübingenGermany
  3. 3.Person Perception Research UnitFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations