Skip to main content
Log in

Response to the comment on Schecklmann et al.: a call to consider both “negative” and “positive” results in brain research on tinnitus

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Brain Structure and Function Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Husain FT, Medina RE, Davis CW, Szymko-Bennett Y, Simonyan K, Pajor NM et al (2011) Neuroanatomical changes due to hearing loss and chronic tinnitus: a combined VBM and DTI study. Brain Res 1369:74–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melcher JR, Knudson IM, Levine RA (2013) Subcallosal brain structure: correlation with hearing threshold at supra-clinical frequencies (>8 kHz), but not with tinnitus. Hear Res 295:79–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schecklmann M, Lehner A, Poeppl TB, Kreuzer PM, Rupprecht R, Rackl J et al (2013) Auditory cortex is implicated in tinnitus distress: a voxel-based morphometry study. Brain Struct Funct

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Schecklmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schecklmann, M., Langguth, B. & Landgrebe, M. Response to the comment on Schecklmann et al.: a call to consider both “negative” and “positive” results in brain research on tinnitus. Brain Struct Funct 218, 1073–1074 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-013-0568-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-013-0568-9

Keywords

Navigation