Abstract
An array of brain regions in the fronto-parietal and temporal lobes cooperates to process observation and execution of actions performed by other individuals. Using functional MRI, we hypothesized that vegetarians and vegans might show brain responses to mouth actions performed by humans, monkeys, and pigs different from omnivores. We scanned 20 omnivores, 19 vegetarians, and 21 vegans while watching a series of silent videos, which presented a single mouth action performed by a human, a monkey, and a pig. Compared to omnivores, vegetarians and vegans have increased functional connectivity between regions of the fronto-parietal and temporal lobes versus the cerebellum during observation of mouth actions performed by humans and, to the same degree, animals. Vegans also had increased connectivity with the supplementary motor area. During human mouth actions, increased amygdala activity in vegetarians and vegans was found. More critically, vegetarians recruited the right middle frontal gyrus and insula, which are involved in social mirroring, whereas vegans activated the left inferior frontal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus, which are part of the mirror neuron system. Monkey mouth actions triggered language network activity in both groups, which might be due to the attempt to decode monkey mouth gesture, with an additional recruitment of associative temporo-occipital areas in vegans, whereas pig mouth actions activated empathy-related regions, including the anterior cingulum. These results support the role of the action observation–execution matching system in social cognition, which enables us to interact not only with our conspecifics but also with species in phylogenetic proximity to humans.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G (2000) Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci 4:267–278
Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS (1995) Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 34:537–541
Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G, Freund HJ (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13:400–404
Buccino G, Lui F, Canessa N, Patteri I, Lagravinese G, Benuzzi F, Porro CA, Rizzolatti G (2004) Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: an FMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 16:114–126
Cauda F, Costa T, Torta DM, Sacco K, D’Agata F, Duca S, Geminiani G, Fox PT, Vercelli A (2012) Meta-analytic clustering of the insular cortex: characterizing the meta-analytic connectivity of the insula when involved in active tasks. Neuroimage 62:343–355
Chang LJ, Yarkoni T, Khaw MW, Sanfey AG (2012) Decoding the role of the insula in human cognition: functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. Cereb Cortex
Cheng Y, Lin CP, Liu HL, Hsu YY, Lim KE, Hung D, Decety J (2007) Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others. Curr Biol 17:1708–1713
Devinsky O, Morrell MJ, Vogt BA (1995) Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain 118(Pt 1):279–306
Filippi M, Riccitelli G, Falini A, Di Salle F, Vuilleumier P, Comi G, Rocca MA (2010) The brain functional networks associated to human and animal suffering differ among omnivores, vegetarians and vegans. PLoS ONE 5:e10847
Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME (2005) The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9673–9678
Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Poline JB, Grasby PJ, Williams SC, Frackowiak RS, Turner R (1995) Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. Neuroimage 2:45–53
Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C, Worsley KJ (1999) Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage 10:385–396
Friston KJ, Penny WD, Glaser DE (2005) Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage 25:661–667
Gazzola V, Keysers C (2009) The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cereb Cortex 19:1239–1255
Grasby PM, Frith CD, Friston KJ, Bench C, Frackowiak RS, Dolan RJ (1993) Functional mapping of brain areas implicated in auditory–verbal memory function. Brain 116(Pt 1):1–20
Hein G, Knight RT (2008) Superior temporal sulcus—It’s my area: or is it? J Cogn Neurosci 20:2125–2136
Iacoboni M (2009) Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annu Rev Psychol 60:653–670
Jirak D, Menz MM, Buccino G, Borghi AM, Binkofski F (2010) Grasping language—a short story on embodiment. Conscious Cogn 19:711–720
Just MA, Carpenter PA, Keller TA, Eddy WF, Thulborn KR (1996) Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science 274:114–116
Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, Liotti M, Freitas CS, Rainey L, Kochunov PV, Nickerson D, Mikiten SA, Fox PT (2000) Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp 10:120–131
Maldjian JA, Laurienti PJ, Kraft RA, Burdette JH (2003) An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. Neuroimage 19:1233–1239
Murty VP, Ritchey M, Adcock RA, LaBar KS (2010) fMRI studies of successful emotional memory encoding: a quantitative meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 48:3459–3469
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
Paulesu E, Perani D, Blasi V, Silani G, Borghese NA, De Giovanni U, Sensolo S, Fazio F (2003) A functional-anatomical model for lipreading. J Neurophysiol 90:2005–2013
Phan KL, Wager T, Taylor SF, Liberzon I (2002) Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage 16:331–348
Regan T (1985) The case for animal rights. University of California, Berkeley 422
Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2001) Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:661–670
Shamay-Tsoory SG (2011) The neural bases for empathy. Neuroscientist 17:18–24
Shamay-Tsoory SG, Aharon-Peretz J, Perry D (2009) Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain 132:617–627
Singer T, Seymour B, O’Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2004) Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303:1157–1162
Singer T, Seymour B, O’Doherty JP, Stephan KE, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2006) Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 439:466–469
Tettamanti M, Buccino G, Saccuman MC, Gallese V, Danna M, Scifo P, Fazio F, Rizzolatti G, Cappa SF, Perani D (2005) Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. J Cogn Neurosci 17:273–281
Thompson KL, Gullone E (2003) Promotion of empathy and prosocial behaviour in children through humane education. Australian Psychologist 38:175–182
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15:273–289
Xiang HD, Fonteijn HM, Norris DG, Hagoort P (2010) Topographical functional connectivity pattern in the perisylvian language networks. Cereb Cortex 20:549–560
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Prof. Paul M. Matthews (Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Imperial College London, and GSK Clinical Imaging Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK) and Dr. Mark A. Horsfield (Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK) for their thoughtful comments to the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no commercial interests with regard to the study reported in the present manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filippi, M., Riccitelli, G., Meani, A. et al. The “vegetarian brain”: chatting with monkeys and pigs?. Brain Struct Funct 218, 1211–1227 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0455-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0455-9