Structure–function relationships in the processing of regret in the orbitofrontal cortex
- 382 Downloads
The influence of counterfactual thinking and regret on choice behavior has been widely acknowledged in economic science (Bell in Oper Res 30:961–981, 1982; Kahneman and Tversky in Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 201–210, 1982; Loomes and Sugden in Econ J 92:805–824, 1982). Neuroimaging studies have only recently begun to explore the neural correlates of this psychological factor and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) activity was observed in several of them depending of the exact characteristics of the employed paradigm. This selective OFC involvement and, moreover, a consistently found dissociation of medial and lateral OFC activity clusters allow inferences to the function of this structure in counterfactual thinking and regret. Vice versa, the differential contribution of OFC subregions to these processes also adds evidence to the current debate on the function of this cortical structure in decision-making that attracted increasing attention in recent years.
KeywordsOrbitofrontal cortex (OFC) Medial OFC Lateral OFC Regret Decision-making Counterfactual thinking
We would like to thank Xun Liu for providing the behavioral data for the reanalysis. This work was supported by the BMBF “National Network Computational Neuroscience–Bernstein Focus: Neuronal Basis of Learning”.
- Ayton P, Fischer I (2004) The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: two faces of subjective randomness? Mem Cogn 32:1369–1378Google Scholar
- Croxson PL, Johansen-Berg H, Behrens TE, Robson MD, Pinsk MA, Gross CG, Richter W, Richter MC, Kastner S, Rushworth MF (2005) Quantitative investigation of connections of the prefrontal cortex in the human and macaque using probabilistic diffusion tractography. J Neurosci 25:8854–8866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kahneman D, Tversky A (1982) The simulation heuristic. In: Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (eds) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 201–210Google Scholar
- Loewenstein GF, Lerner JS (2003) The role of affect in decision-making. In: Davidson RJ, Scherer KR, Goldsmith HH (eds) Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 616–642Google Scholar
- Northoff G, Richter A, Gessner M, Schlagenhauf F, Fell J, Baumgart F, Kaulisch T, Kotter R, Stephan KE, Leschinger A, Hagner T, Bargel B, Witzel T, Hinrichs H, Bogerts B, Scheich H, Heinze HJ (2000) Functional dissociation between medial and lateral prefrontal cortical spatiotemporal activation in negative and positive emotions: a combined fMRI/MEG study. Cereb Cortex 10:93–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schoenbaum G, Gottfried JA, Murray EA (eds) (2007) Linking affect to action: critical contributions of the orbitofrontal cortex. Wiley–Blackwell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Sundali J, Croson R (2006) Biases in casino betting: the hot hand and the gambler’s fallacy. Judgm Decis Mak 1:1–12Google Scholar
- Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction (Adaptive computation and machine learning). MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar