Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of the structure of human and murine greater omentum

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Anatomy and Embryology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In humans, the greater omentum is a fatty peritoneal fold that extends from the greater curvature of the stomach to cover most abdominal organs. It performs many functions, which include acting as a reservoir of resident peritoneal inflammatory cells, a storage site for lipid, and a regulator of fluid exchange in and out of the peritoneal cavity. Most importantly, the omentum readily adheres to areas of inflammation and peritoneal damage, often leading to adhesion formation. Despite its clinical importance, the omentum remains an understudied organ, and discrepancies exist as to its exact morphology. This study uses a combination of phase contrast microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to elucidate the structure of the greater omentum of both human and mouse and determine whether it possesses a typical surface mesothelial cell lining similar to other serosa. Results indicated that both human and murine omenta were of similar structure and composed of two distinct types of tissue, one adipose-rich and the other translucent and membranous. The adipose-rich regions were well-vascularised and covered by a continuous mesothelial cell layer except at the sites of milky spots. In contrast, translucent areas were poorly vascularised and contained numerous fenestrations of varying size. The possible function and developmental origin of these gaps is unclear; however, their role in promoting omental adhesion formation and in the successful use of omental graft material is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baradi AF, Rao SN (1976) A scanning electron microscope study of mouse peritoneal mesothelium. Tissue Cell 8:159–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beelen RH (1991) The greater omentum: physiology and immunological concepts. Neth J Surg 43:145–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beelen RH, Fluitsma DM, Hoefsmit EC (1980) The cellular composition of omentum milky spots and the ultrastructure of milky spot macrophages and reticulum cells. J Reticuloendothel Soc 28:585–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellingan GJ, Caldwell H, Howie SE, Dransfield I, Haslett C (1996) In vivo fate of the inflammatory macrophage during the resolution of inflammation: inflammatory macrophages do not die locally, but emigrate to the draining lymph nodes. J Immunol 157:2577–2585

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro M, Carceller F, Llanos C, et al. (1993) The effect of omental wrapping on nerve graft regeneration. Br J Plast Surg 46:426–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng YM, Wang ST, Chou CY (2002) Serum CA-125 in preoperative patients at high risk for endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 99:375–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement PB, Young RH, Hanna W, Scully RE (1994) Sclerosing peritonitis associated with luteinized thecomas of the ovary. A clinicopathological analysis of six cases. Am J Surg Pathol 18:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranshaw ML, Leak LV (1990) Milky spots of the omentum: a source of peritoneal cells in the normal and stimulated animal. Arch Histol Cytol 53:165–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui L, Johkura K, Liang Y, Teng R, Ogiwara N, Okouchi Y, Asanuma K, Sasaki K (2002) Biodefense function of omental milky spots through cell adhesion molecules and leukocyte proliferation. Cell Tissue Res 310:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis H (1962) The aetiology of post-operative abdominal adhesions. Br J Surg 50:10–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fedorko ME, Hirsch JG (1971) Studies on transport of macromolecules and small particles across mesothelial cells of the mouse omentum. Morphologic aspects. Exp Cell Res 69:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felix MD (1961) Observations on the surface cells of the mouse omentum as studied with the phase-contrast and electron microscopes. J Natl Cancer Inst 27:713–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuo Y, Shinohara H, Matsuda T (1990) The distribution of lymphatic stomata in the diaphragm of the golden hamster. J Anat 169:13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith HS (2001) Role of the omentum in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurol Res 23:555–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grouls V, Berndt R (1995) Endometrioid adenoma (polypoid endometriosis) of the omentum maius. Pathol Res Pract 191:1049–1052

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall JC, Heel, KA, Papadimitriou JM, Platell C (1998) The pathobiology of peritonitis. Gastroenterology 114:185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick SE, Mutsaers SE (2004) Mesothelial progenitor cells and their potential in tissue engineering. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36:621–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosgood G (1990) The omentum—the forgotten organ: physiology and potential surgical applications in dogs and cats. Comp Cont Ed Pract Vet 12:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodera Y, Nakanishi H, Ito S, Yamamura Y, Kanemitsu Y, Shimizu Y, Hirai T, Yasui K, Kato T, Tatematsu M (2002) Quantitative detection of disseminated cancer cells in the greater omentum of gastric carcinoma patients with real-time RT-PCR: a comparison with peritoneal lavage cytology. Gastric Cancer 5:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krist LF, Eestermans IL, Steenbergen JJ, et al. (1995) Cellular composition of milky spots in the human greater omentum: an immunochemical and ultrastructural study. Anat Rec 241:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebermann-Meffert D (1985) Greater omentum: anatomy, physiology, pathology and surgery with a historical survey. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebermann-Meffert D (2000) The greater omentum. Anatomy, embryology, and surgical applications. Surg Clin North Am 80:275–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison LD, Bergstrom-Porter B, Torres AR, SheltonE (1979) Regulation of surface topography of mouse peritoneal cells. Formation of microvilli and vesiculated pits on omental mesothelial cells by serum and other proteins. J Cell Biol 82:783–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michailova K, Wassilev W, Wedel T (1999) Scanning and transmission electron microscopic study of visceral and parietal peritoneal regions in the rat. Anat Anz 181:253–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mironov VA, Gusev, SA, Baradi AF (1979) Mesothelial stomata overlying omental milky spots: scanning electron microscopic study. Cell Tissue Res 201:327–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura A, Yazawa S, Nishimura T, et al. (2000) A new method for assaying adhesion of cancer cells to the greater omentum and its application for evaluating anti-adhesion activities of chemically synthesized oligosaccharides. Clin Exp Metastasis 18:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Pond CM, Mattacks CA (1995) Interactions between adipose tissue around lymph nodes and lymphoid cells in vitro. J Lipid Res 36:2219–2231

    Google Scholar 

  • Predescu D, Vogel SM, Malik AB (2004) Functional and morphological studies of protein transcytosis in continuous endothelia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 287:L895–L901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery AT (1973) Regeneration in parietal and visceral peritoneum in the immature animal: a light and electron microscopy study. Br J Surg 60:969–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranvier L (1874) Recherches sur la formation des mailles du grand epiploon. Arch Physiol, 2nd series, 1:421–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan G B, Grobety J, Majno G (1971) Postoperative peritoneal adhesions. A study of the mechanisms. Am J Path 65:117–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai S, Hishima T, Takazawa Y, et al. (2001) Gastrointestinal stromal tumors and KIT-positive mesenchymal cells in the omentum. Pathol Int 51:524–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimotsuma M, Shields JW, Simpson-Morgan MW, et al. (1993) Morpho-physiological function and role of omental milky spots as omentum-associated lymphoid tissue (OALT) in the peritoneal cavity. Lymphology 26:90–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimotsuma M, Simpson-Morgan MW, Takahashi T, Hagiwara A (1992) Activation of omental milky spots and milky spot macrophages by intraperitoneal administration of a streptococcal preparation, OK-432. Cancer Res 52:5400–5402

    Google Scholar 

  • Simer PH (1934) On the morphology of the omentum, with special reference to its lymphatics. Am J Anat 54:203–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivit CJ (1996) CT scan of mesentery-omentum peritoneum. Radiol Clin North Am 34:863–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Sompayrac SW, Mindelzun RE, Silverman PM, Sze R (1997) The greater omentum. Am J Roentgenol 168:683–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenram U (1997) Sclerosing peritonitis in a case of benign cystic ovarian teratoma. A case report. APMIS 105:414–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang NS (1974) The regional difference of pleural mesothelial cells in rabbits. Am Rev Respir Dis 110:623–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibel MA, Majno G (1973) Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A post-mortem study. Am J Surg 126:345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker D, Papadimitriou JM, Walters MN (1980) The mesothelium; techniques for investigating the origin, nature and behaviour of mesothelial cells. J Pathol 132:263–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Zareie M, Hekking LH, Welten AG, et al. (2003) Contribution of lactate buffer, glucose and glucose degradation products to peritoneal injury in vivo. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:2629–2637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Naito M, Umezu H, et al. (1997) Macrophage differentiation and expression of macrophage colony-stimulating factor in murine milky spots and omentum after macrophage elimination. J Leukoc Biol 61:436–444

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zocchi L (2002) Physiology and pathophysiology of pleural fluid transport. Eur Respir J 20:1545–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the BBSRC and Pfizer. We are indebted to Professor Giorgio Gabella for his advice during the study and to the members of his laboratory for their technical guidance. We also appreciate the continued support provided by the electron microscopy unit at the University of Manchester.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grenham Ireland.

Additional information

Study funded by BBSRC and Pfizer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilkosz, S., Ireland, G., Khwaja, N. et al. A comparative study of the structure of human and murine greater omentum. Anat Embryol 209, 251–261 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-004-0446-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-004-0446-6

Keywords

Navigation