Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Apoplectic leiomyomas: does ethnicity make a difference? a clinicopathologic study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Apoplectic leiomyomas—benign uterine leiomyomas with morphologic changes including hemorrhage, hypercellularity, mitotic activity, nuclear atypia, and even necrosis—can be difficult to distinguish from uterine leiomyosarcomas. Apoplectic leiomyomas have been associated with hormonal therapy; however, the relationship between apoplectic leiomyomas, hormones, and ethnicity has not received much attention in the literature. We evaluated the relationship of hormonal therapy and ethnicity in 869 women with uterine leiomyomas, 136 of which qualified as apoplectic leiomyomas.

Apoplectic leiomyomas were observed in 23.3% (49/210) of women exposed to hormonal therapy compared to 13.2% (87/659) of women not exposed to hormonal therapy (p < 0.0001). Women taking ethinyl estradiol/norethindrone (Lo-Estrin), leuprolide, and medroxyprogesterone were significantly more likely to have apoplectic leiomyomas compared to women taking other hormonal therapies. Apoplectic leiomyomas were observed in 28.9% (44/152) of African-American women compared to 12.4% (79/639) of Caucasian women (p < 0.0001), and this difference remained statistically significant regardless of hormone use. Apoplectic leiomyomas were observed in 22.1% (77/349) of women ≤ 45 years of age compared to 11.3% (59/520) of women > 45 years of age (p < 0.0001), and this difference remained statistically significant regardless of hormone use.This is the largest study to date examining apoplectic leiomyomas in women on known hormonal therapy compared to women with uterine leiomyomas, but not on hormonal therapy. Information about hormonal therapy, ethnicity, and age can be helpful in the diagnostic interpretation of apoplectic leiomyoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myles JL, Hart WR (1985) Apoplectic leiomyomas of the uterus. A clincopathologic study of five distinct hemorrhagic leiomyomas associated with oral contraceptive usage. Am J Surg Pathol 9:798–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Norris HJ, Hilliard GD, Irey NS (1988) Hemorrhagic cellular leiomyomas (“apoplectic leiomyoma”) of the uterus associated with pregnancy and oral contraceptives. Int J Gynecol Pathol 7:212–224. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-198809000-00002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lamb CA, Young RH (2009) Apoplectic change in uterine leiomyomas: an analysis of 70 cases highlighting previously underemphasized aspects. Mod Pathol 28(suppl 1):223A

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd C, McCluggage WG (2011) Unusual morphological features of uterine leiomyomas treated with progestogens. J Clin Path 64:485–489. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2011.089664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett JA, Lamb C, Young RH (2016) Apoplectic leiomyomas: a morphologic analysis of 100 cases highlighting unusual features. Am J Surg Pathol 40:563–568. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ip PPC, Lam K, Cheung C et al (2007) Tranexamic acid-associated necrosis and intralesional thrombosis of uterine leiomyomas: a clinicopathologic study of 147 cases emphasizing the importance of drug-induced necrosis and early infarcts in leiomyomas. Am J Surg Pathol 31:1215–1224. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318032125e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Azzopardi JG, Zayid I (1967) Synthetic progestogen-oestrogen therapy and uterine changes. J Clin Path 20:731–738. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.20.5.731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Briscoe CC (1964) Acute hemorrhagic degeneration of a leiomyoma following norethindrone acetate: report of a case. Obstet Gynecol 23:279–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Faulkner RL (1947) Red degeneration of uterine myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 53:474–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(47)90410-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fechner RE (1968) Atypical leiomyomas and synthetic progestin therapy. Am J Clin Pathol 49:697–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/49.5.697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldzieher JW, Maqueo M, Ricaud L et al (1966) Induction of degenerative changes in uterine myomas by high-dosage progestin therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 96:1078–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(66)90516-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tiltman AJ (1985) The effect of progestins on the mitotic activity of uterine fibromyomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 4:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-198506000-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maruo T, Matsuo H, Samoto T et al (2000) Effects of progesterone on uterine leiomyoma growth and apoptosis. Steroids 65:585–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-128x(00)00171-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ober WB (1970) Morphologic changes in the uterus associated with steroid contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices. Acta Cytol 4:156

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ober WB (1977) Effects of oral and intrauterine administration of contraceptives on the uterus. Hum Pathol 8:513–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(77)80112-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prakash S, Scully RE (1964) Sarcoma-like pseudopregnancy, changes in uterine leiomyomas. Report of a case resulting from prolonged norethindrone therapy. Obstet Gynecology 24:106–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Segaloff A, Weed JC, Sternberg WH et al (1949) The progesterone therapy of human uterine leiomyomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 9:1273–1291. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-9-12-1273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sreennan J, Prayson RA, Biscotti CV et al (1996) Histopathologic findings in 107 uterine leiomyomas treated with leuprolide acetate compared with 126 controls. Am J Surg Pathol 20:427–432. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199604000-00005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mixson WT (1961) Hammond DO (1961) Response of fibromyomas to a progestin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 82:754–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(16)36139-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacoby V, Fujiomoto VV, Guidice LC et al (2010) Racial and ethnic disparities in benign gynecologic conditions and associated surgeries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:514–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.039

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kjerulff KH, Langenberg P, Seidman JD et al (1996) Uterine leiomyomas. Racial differences in severity, symptoms and age at diagnosis. J Reprod Med 41:483–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marshall LM, Spieglman D, Barbieri RL et al (1997) Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race. Obstet Gynecol 90:967–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00534-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Taran FA, Brown HL, Stewart EA (2010) Racial diversity in uterine leiomyoma clinical studies. Fertil Steril 94:1500–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker CL, Stewart EA (2005) Uterine fibroids: the elephant in the room. Science 308:1589–1591. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1112063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weiss G, Noorhasan D, Schott LL et al (2009) Racial differences in women who have a hysterectomy for benign conditions. Womens Health Issues 19:202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2009.03.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Houston KD, Hunter DS, Hodges LC et al (2001) Uterine leiomyomas: mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Toxicol Pathol 29:100–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/019262301301418900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC et al (2003) High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(1):100–107. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cramer SF, Patel A (1990) The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am J Clin Pathol 94:435–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/94.4.435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leppert P, Fouany M, Segars JH (2013) Understanding uterine fibroids. In: Segars JH (ed) fibroids, 1st edn. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118456996.ch1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J et al (2013) Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 122:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318299a6cf

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Flake GP, Anderson J, Dixon D (2003) Etiology and pathogenesis of uterine leomyomas: a review. Environ Health Perspect 111:1037–1054. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.5787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Thorne JT, Segal TR, Chang S et al (2015) Dynamic reciprocity between cells and their microenvironment in reproduction. Biol Reprod 92:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.114.121368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Leppert PC, Jayes FL, Segars JH (2014) The extracellular matrix contributes to mechanotransduction in uterine fibroids. Obstet Gynecol Int 2014:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/783289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mehine M, Kaasinen E, Mäkinen N et al (2013) Characterization of uterine leiomyomas by whole-genome sequencing. N Engl J Med 369:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1302736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Halder SK, Laknaur A, Miller J et al (2015) Novel MED12 gene somatic mutations in women from the southern United States with symptomatic uterine fibroids. Mol Genet Genomics 290:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-014-0938-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Markowski DN, Helmke BM, Bartnitzke S et al (2014) Uterine fibroids: do we deal with more than one disease? Int J Gynecol Pathol 33:568–572. https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0000000000000096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Georgieva B, Milev I, Minkov I et al (2012) Characterization of the uterine leiomyoma microRNAome by deep sequencing. Genomics 99:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2012.03.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee J, Ryu T, Cho C et al (2011) Different characteristics of mitochondrial microsatellite instability between uterine leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas. Pathol Oncol Res 17:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-010-9297-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Walker CL (2002) (2002) Role of hormonal and reproductive factors in the etiology and treatment of uterine leiomyoma. Recent Prog Horm Res 57:277–294. https://doi.org/10.1210/rp.57.1.277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Grings AO, Lora V, Dias-Rerreira G et al (2012) Protein expression of estrogen receptors α and β and aromatase in myometrium and uterine leiomyoma. Gynecol Obstet Invest 73:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1159/000330700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang L, Huang H, Liu D et al (2012) Evaluation of 14–3-3 protein family levels and associated receptor expression of estrogen and progesterone in human uterine leiomyomas. Gynecol Endocrinol 28:665–668. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2012.650768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rein MS, Barbieri RL (1995) Freidman AJ (1995) Progesterone: a critical role in the pathogenesis of uterine myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172:14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90077-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rein MS (2000) Advances in uterine leiomyoma research: the progesterone hypothesis. Environ Health Perspect 108(Suppl 5):791–793. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108s5791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Maruo T, Matsuo H, Shimomura Y et al (2003) Effects of progesterone on growth factors expression in human uterine leiomyoma. Steroids 68:817–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2003.08.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim JJ, Sefton EC (2012) The role of progesterone signaling in the pathogenesis of uterine leiomyoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol 358:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gebhard, C (1899) Pathologische Anatomie d. weiblichen Sexualorgane. S. Hirtzel, Leipzig

  47. Lipschütz A, Iglesias R (1938) Multiples tumeurs utérines et extragénitales provoquées par le benzoate d’oestradiol. Compt rend soc biol 129:519–524

    Google Scholar 

  48. Goodman AL (1946) Progesterone therapy in uterine fibromyoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 6(6):402–408. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-6-5-402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Andrews MC, Andrews WC, Strauss AF (1959) Effects of progestin-induced pseudopregnancy on endometriosis clinical and microscopic studies. Am J of Obstet Gynecol 78:776–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(16)36574-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ishikawa H, Reierstad S, Demura M et al (2009) High aromatase expression in uterine leiomyoma tissues of African-American women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:1752–1756. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Catherino WH, Eltoukhi HM, Al-Hendy A (2013) Racial and ethnic differences in the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations of uterine leiomyoma. Semin Reprod Med 31:370–379. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1348896

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Sparic R, Mirkovic L, Malvasi A et al (2016) Epidemiology of uterine myomas: a review. Int J Fertil Steril 9:424–435. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2015.4599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Turner helped to conceive the study. Dr. Turner designed the study, drafted, and finalized the manuscript. Dr. Cramer critically revised and finalized the manuscript. Dr. Heller critically revised and finalized the manuscript. Dr. Tavassoli helped to conceive the study. Dr. Tavassoli critically revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley M. Turner.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This paper represents a retrospective evaluation of benign de-identified tissue. Approval by the ethics committee and/or informed consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Turner declares that he has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Dr. Cramer declares that he has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Dr. Heller declares that she has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Dr. Tavassoli declares that she has no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 215 KB)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 3285 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Turner, B.M., Cramer, S.F., Heller, D.S. et al. Apoplectic leiomyomas: does ethnicity make a difference? a clinicopathologic study. Virchows Arch 480, 645–654 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03225-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03225-z

Keywords

Navigation