Skip to main content
Log in

Combined grade and nuclear grade are prognosis predictors of epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a multi-institutional retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Epithelioid mesothelioma is the most prevalent subtype of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. A recently described nuclear-grading system predicted survival in patients with epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma. The present study was undertaken to validate this grading system in epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (EMPM) and to compare to combined grade, including nuclear atypia, mitotic count, and tumor necrosis. Cases of EMPM, from 1995 to 2018, were analyzed from 7 French institutions from RENAPE network. Solid growth, tumor necrosis, nuclear atypia, and mitotic count were evaluated by at least 3 pathologists from the RENAPATH group. The predictions in terms of OS and PFS of nuclear grade and combined grade were analyzed. Nuclear grade was computed combining nuclear atypia score and mitotic count into a grade of I–III. Another system combining nuclear atypia score, mitotic score, and tumor necrosis was evaluated and defined as a combined grade I–III. A total of 138 cases were identified. The median follow-up was 38.9 months (range: 1.1–196.6). Nuclear and combined grades III were independently associated with a shorter OS (p < 0.05), and a shorter PFS (p < 0.05). Patients with combined grade I tumors had the best overall and progression-free survivals, in comparison to nuclear grade I. In this large multicentric study, combined grade and nuclear grade were the best independent predictors of OS and PFS in EMPM. These systems should be easily described by pathologists involved into the management of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, because of their potential therapeutic implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glehen O Mésothéliome péritonéal malin. In: Orphanet

  2. Husain A, Colby T, Ordóñez N et al (2018) Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma 2017 update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med 142:89–108. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2017-0124-RA

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yan T, Deraco M, Baratti D et al (2009) Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: multi-institutional experience. J Clin Oncol 27:6237–6242. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Le Stang N, Bouvier V, Glehen O et al (2019) Incidence and survival of peritoneal malignant mesothelioma between 1989 and 2015: a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol 60:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yan T, Deraco M, Elias D et al (2011) A novel tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma using outcome analysis of a multi-institutional database*. Cancer 117:1855–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosen L, Karrison T, Ananthanarayanan V et al (2018) Nuclear grade and necrosis predict prognosis in malignant epithelioid pleural mesothelioma: a multi-institutional study. Mod Pathol 31:598–606. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2017.170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nonaka D, Kusamura S, Baratti D et al (2005) Diffuse malignant mesothelioma of the peritoneum: a clinicopathologic study of 35 patients treated locoregionally at a single institution. Cancer 104:2181–2188. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deraco M, Nonaka D, Baratti D et al (2006) Prognostic analysis of clinicopathologic factors in 49 patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion. Ann Surg Oncol 13:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerruto CA, Brun EA, Chang D, Sugarbaker PH (2006) Prognostic significance of histomorphologic parameters in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1654–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan T, Brun E, Cerruto C et al (2006) Prognostic indicators for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Ann Surg Oncol 14:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9169-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee M, Alexander H, Burke A (2013) Diffuse mesothelioma of the peritoneum : a pathological study of 64 tumours treated with cytoreductive therapy. Copyright © Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited. Pathology 45:464–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu S, Staats P, Lee M et al (2014) Diffuse mesothelioma of the peritoneum: correlation between histological and clinical parameters and survival in 73 patients. Pathology 46:604–609. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAT.0000000000000181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krasinskas AM, Borczuk AC, Hartman DJ et al (2016) Prognostic significance of morphological growth patterns and mitotic index of epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Histopathology 68:729–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Valente K, Blackham AU, Levine E et al (2016) A histomorphologic grading system that predicts overall survival in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma with epithelioid subtype. Am J Surg Pathol 40:1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000696

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Villeneuve L, Passot G, Glehen O et al (2017) The RENAPE observational registry: rationale and framework of the rare peritoneal tumors French patient registry. Orphanet J Rare Dis 12:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0571-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacquet P, Sugarbaker P (1996) Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res 82:359–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1247-5_23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Villeneuve L, Isaac S, Glehen O et al (2014) The RENAPE network: towards a new healthcare organization for the treatment of rare tumors of the peritoneum. Description of the network and role of the pathologists. Ann Pathol 34:4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annpat.2014.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kadota K, Suzuki K, Colovos C et al (2012) A nuclear grading system is a strong predictor of survival in epitheloid diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. Mod Pathol 25:260–271. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: http://www.r-project.org/

  20. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hartman D, Borczuk A, Dacic S, Krasinskas A (2017) Reproducibility for histologic parameters in peritoneal mesothelioma. Hum Pathol 67:54–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dalton L, Pinder S, Elston C et al (2000) Histologic grading of breast cancer: linkage of patient outcome with level of pathologist agreement. Mod Pathol 13:730–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Silverberg SG (1976) Reproducibility of the mitosis count in the histologic diagnosis of smooth muscle tumors of the uterus. Hum Pathol 7:451–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Valmary-Degano S, Colpart P, Villeneuve L et al (2017) Immunohistochemical evaluation of two antibodies against PD-L1 and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in epithelioid peritoneal malignant mesothelioma: a RENAPE study. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1915–1923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chapel D, Schulte J, Absenger G et al (2021) Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: prognostic significance of clinical and pathologic parameters and validation of a nuclear-grading system in a multi-institutional series of 225 cases. Mod Pathol 34:380–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-00688-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosen LE, Karrison T, Ananthanarayanan V et al (2018) Nuclear grade and necrosis predict prognosis in malignant epithelioid pleural mesothelioma: a multi-institutional study. Mod Pathol 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2017.170

  27. Kepenekian V, Elias D, Passot G et al (2016) Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: evaluation of systemic chemotherapy with comprehensive treatment through the RENAPE database: multi-institutional retrospective study. Eur J Cancer 65:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.06.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Turaga K, Deraco M, Alexander H (2017) Current management strategies for peritoneal mesothelioma. Int J Hyperthermia 33:579–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schulte J, Chapel D, Attanoos R et al (2021) Comparison of nuclear grade, necrosis, and histologic subtype between biopsy and resection in pleural malignant mesothelioma. Am J Clin Pathol aqab054. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqab054

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Véréna Landel for the English language correction and critical suggestions.

Collaborators

Julio Abba, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France); Karine Abboud, MD (Department of General Surgery, University Hospital, Saint Étienne, France); Mohammad Alyami, MD (D King Faisal specialist hospital and research center, Riyad, Saudi Arabia); Amroun Koceila, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Jean Godinot Cancer Institute, Reims, France); Catherine Arvieux, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France); Naoual Bakrin, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France); Sandrine Barbois, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France); Houda Ben Rejeb, MD (Department of Pathology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France); Jean-Marc Bereder, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Archet 2 University Hospital, Nice, France); Frédéric Bibeau, MD, PhD (Department of Pathology, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France); Isabelle Bonnefoy (Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France); Pierre-Emmanuel Bonnot, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France); Olivier Bouche, MD, PhD, (Department of Gastroenterology, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France); Dominique Bouzard, MD, (Department of Surgery, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Colombes, France); Cécile Brigand, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France); Sébastien Carrère, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Val d’Aurelle Montpellier Cancer Center, Montpellier, France); Bertrand Célérier, MD (Department of Surgery, Bordeaux Hospital University Center, Bordeaux, France); Cécilia Ceribelli, MD (Department of Surgery, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France); Julien Coget, MD (Department of Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France); Thomas Courvoisier, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France); Cécile de Chaisemartin, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France); Jean-Baptiste Delhorme, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Hautepierre University Hospital, Strasbourg, France); Anthony Dohan, MD, PhD (Department of Radiology, Cochin University Hospital, Paris, France); Frédéric Dumont, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau Cancer Center, Saint-Herblain, France); Sylvaine Durand-Fontanier, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France); Clarisse Eveno, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France); Gwenaël Ferron, MD, PhD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute IUTC, Toulouse, France); Johan Gagniere, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France); Alexandre Galan, MD (Department of Radiology, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France); Laurent Ghouti, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France); François-Noël Gilly, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France); Laurence Gladieff, MD (Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute IUCT, Toulouse, France); Diane Goéré, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France); Jean-Marc Guilloit, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Francois Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center, Caen, France); Frédéric Guyon, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France); Bruno Heyd, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon, France); Christine Hoeffel, MD, PhD (Department of Radiology, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France); Charles Honoré, MD, PhD, (Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France); Eve Huart, MD (Department of General Surgery, University Hospital, Saint Étienne, France); Martin Hübner, MD, PhD (Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzeland); Rachid Kaci, MD (Department of Pathology, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France); Reza Kianmanesh (Department of Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France); Jérémie Lefevre, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France); Bernard Lelong, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France); Justine Lerooy, MD, (Department of Digestive Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France); Agnès Leroux-Broussier, MD (Department of Pathology, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France); Réa Lo Dico, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France); Frédéric Marchal, MD, PhD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France); Pascale Mariani, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Curie Institute, Paris, France); Pierre Meeus, MD (Department of Surgery, Léon Bérard Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lyon, France); Cédric Nadeau, MD (Gynaecology and Obstetrics Ward, Mother and Child Pole, Poitiers University Hospital, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France); Cécile Odin (Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France); Pablo Ortega-Deballon, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France); Brice Paquette, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon, France); Guillaume Passot, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France); Patrice Peyrat, MD (Department of Surgery, Léon Bérard Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lyon, France); Denis Pezet, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France); Guillaume Piessen, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France); Nicolas Pirro, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Timône University Hospital, Marseille, France); Hélène Plouhinec, MD (Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France); Marc Pocard, MD, PhD (Surgical Oncologic & Digestive Unit, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France); Flora Poizat, MD (Department of Pathology, Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France); François Quenet, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Val d’Aurelle Montpellier Cancer Center, Montpellier, France); Patrick Rat, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France); Pierre Rousselot, MD (Department of Pathology, Francois Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center, Caen, France); Pascal Rousset, MD, PhD (Department of Radiology, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France); Hélène Senellart (Department of Medical Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau Cancer Center, Saint-Herblain, France); Olivia Sgarbura MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Val d’Aurelle Montpellier Cancer Center, Montpellier, France); Igor Sielezneff, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, La Timône University Hospital, Marseille, France); Isabelle Sourrouille, MD (Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France); Magali Svrcek, MD, PhD (Department of Pathology, Hospital Saint-Antoine AP-HP, Paris, France); Abdelkader Taibi, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France); Emilie Thibaudeau, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, ICO René Gauducheau Cancer Center, Saint-Herblain, France); Yann Touchefeu (Department of Gastroenterology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes); Jean-Jacques Tuech, MD, PhD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Charles Nicolle University Hospital, Rouen, France); Sharmini Varatharajah, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, Francois Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center, Caen, France); Delphine Vaudoyer, MD (Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon-Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France); Sophie Vermersch, MD (Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, St Etienne, France); Véronique Verriele-Beurrier, MD (Department of Pathology, ICO Paul Papin Cancer Center, Angers, France); Romuald Wernert, MD (Department of Surgical Oncology, ICO Paul Papin Cancer Center, Angers, France).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Sylvie Isaac, Juliette Hommell-Fontaine, Peggy Dartigues, and N. Benzerdjeb contributed to the design of the study. Sylvie Isaac, Juliette Hommell-Fontaine, Peggy Dartigues, and N. Benzerdjeb counted the number of mitosis. Irène Villa managed the software Calopix. Nazim Benzerdjeb, Peggy Dartigues, Séverine Valmary-Degano, Eliane Mery, Gerlinde Averous, Anne Chevallier, Marie-Hélène Laverriere, Sylvie Isaac, and Juliette Hommell-Fontaine reviewed slides. N. Benzerdjeb contributed to analysis of the results and writing of the manuscript. Nazim Benzerdjeb, Peggy Dartigues, Vahan Kepenekian, Séverine Valmary-Degano, Eliane Mery, Gerlinde Averous, Anne Chevallier, Marie-Hélène Laverriere, Irène Villa, Françoise Galateau Sallé, Laurent Villeneuve, Olivier Glehen, Sylvie Isaac, Juliette Hommell-Fontaine, and on behalf of the RENAPE Network contributed to writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazim Benzerdjeb.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benzerdjeb, N., Dartigues, P., Kepenekian, V. et al. Combined grade and nuclear grade are prognosis predictors of epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Virchows Arch 479, 927–936 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03144-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03144-z

Keywords

Navigation