Skip to main content

Histopathologic features predict survival in diffuse pleural malignant mesothelioma on pleural biopsies

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. The only universally recognized pathological prognostic factor is histopathological subtype with a shorter survival in non-epithelioid subtypes. Recently, a grading of epithelioid mesothelioma on surgical resection has been proposed. The aim of our work is to assess the prognostic role of several histopathological factors on a retrospective cohort of 116 patients diagnosed as a pleural mesothelioma for more than 95% of patients on pleural biopsy. Our work shows that mitotic count <3/10 HPF (p < 0.0001), the lack of necrosis (p = 0.0379), mild nuclear atypia (p = 0.0054), the lack of atypical mitoses (p = 0.0265), a nucleoli size <3 μm (p = 0.0139), and a nucleoli absent or visible at 200× or higher magnification (p = 0.0170) are significantly associated with a better median overall survival in epithelioid mesothelioma. The presence of atypical mitoses was found to be related to a worse median survival in non-epithelioid mesothelioma. Mitotic count, necrosis, nuclear atypia, and nucleoli size are not associated with overall survival in non-epithelioid mesothelioma. Our work highlights that histopathological prognostic factors can be assessed on pleural biopsies and can predict reliably median overall survival. This is of interest in order to define subgroups of patients who could benefit of different therapies and select patients who could benefit of surgical excision.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Karpathiou G, Stefanou D, Froudarakis ME (2015) Pleural neoplastic pathology. Respir Med 109:931–943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Taioli E, Wolf AS, Flores RM (2015) Meta-analysis of survival after pleurectomy decortication versus extrapleural pneumonectomy in mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg 99:472–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jassem J, Ramlau R, Santoro A, Schuette W, Chemaissani A, Hong S, Blatter J, Adachi S, Hanauske A, Manegold C (2008) Phase III trial of pemetrexed plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care in previously treated patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 26:1698–1704

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Stahel RA, Riesterer O, Xyrafas A et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy of malignant pleural mesothelioma with or without hemithoracic radiotherapy (SAKK 17/04): a randomised, international, multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:1651–1658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kadota K, Suzuki K, Colovos C, Sima CS, Rusch VW, Travis WD, Adusumilli PS (2012) A nuclear grading system is a strong predictor of survival in epitheloid diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. Mod Pathol 25:260–271

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Travis WD (ed) (2015) WHO classification of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart, 4th edn. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Husain AN, Colby T, Ordonez N et al (2013) Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: 2012 update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137:647–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Galateau-Sallé F, Gilg Soit Ilg A, Le Stang N et al (2014) The French mesothelioma network from 1998 to 2013. Ann Pathol 34:51–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Thompson LD (2002) Pheochromocytoma of the adrenal gland scaled score (PASS) to separate benign from malignant neoplasms: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 100 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 26:551–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C (1982) Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 6:655–663

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Moch H (2016) WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ramael M, Jacobs W, Weyler J, Białasiewicz P, Van den Bossche J, Buysse C, Vermeire P, Van Marck E (1994) Proliferation in malignant mesothelioma as determined by mitosis counts and immunoreactivity for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). J Pathol 172:247–253

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Koyuncu A, Koksal D, Ozmen O, Demirag F, Bayiz H, Aydogdu K, Berkoglu M (2015) Prognostic factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a retrospective study of 60 Turkish patients. J Cancer Res Ther 11:216–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Perry A, Stafford SL, Scheithauer BW, Suman VJ, Lohse CM (1997) Meningioma grading: an analysis of histologic parameters. Am J Surg Pathol 21:1455–1465

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Duregon E, Molinaro L, Volante M, Ventura L, Righi L, Bolla S, Terzolo M, Sapino A, Papotti MG (2014) Comparative diagnostic and prognostic performances of the hematoxylin-eosin and phospho-histone H3 mitotic count and Ki-67 index in adrenocortical carcinoma. Mod Pathol 27:1246–1254

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dalton LW, Page DL, Dupont WD (1994) Histologic grading of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study. Cancer 73:2765–2770

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kalatova B, Jesenska R, Hlinka D, Dudas M (2015) Tripolar mitosis in human cells and embryos: occurrence, pathophysiology and medical implications. Acta Histochem 117:111–125

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cerruto CA, Brun EA, Chang D, Sugarbaker PH (2006) Prognostic significance of histomorphologic parameters in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130:1654–1661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Valente K, Blackham AU, Levine E, Russell G, Votanopoulos KI, Stewart JH, Shen P, Geisinger KR, Sirintrapun SJ (2016) A histomorphologic grading system that predicts overall survival in diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma with epithelioid subtype. Am J Surg Pathol 40:1243–1248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zink D, Fischer AH, Nickerson JA (2004) Nuclear structure in cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer 4:677–687

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bignold LP (2003) Pathogenetic mechanisms of nuclear pleomorphism of tumour cells based on the mutator phenotype theory of carcinogenesis. Histol Histopathol 18:657–664

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gisselsson D (2002) Tumour morphology—interplay between chromosome aberrations and founder cell differentiation. Histol Histopathol 17:1207–1212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabien Forest.

Ethics declarations

Authorization to use human biological samples for research was obtained (no. AC-2013-1835). Institutional ethical approval was obtained in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

No funding was received.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Habougit, C., Trombert-Paviot, B., Karpathiou, G. et al. Histopathologic features predict survival in diffuse pleural malignant mesothelioma on pleural biopsies. Virchows Arch 470, 639–646 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-017-2109-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mesothelioma, malignant
  • Neoplasm grading
  • Mitosis
  • Survival analysis