Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

ESR1, ERBB2, and Ki67 mRNA expression predicts stage and grade of non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pathological staging and grading are crucial for risk assessment in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Molecular grading might support pathological evaluation and minimize interobserver variability. In this study, the well-established breast cancer markers ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKI67 were evaluated as potential molecular markers to support grading and staging in NMIBC. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (FFPE) of patients with NMIBC. Messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of the aforementioned markers was measured by single-step reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using RNA-specific TaqMan assays. Relative gene expression was determined by normalization to two reference genes (CALM2 and B2M) using the 40−ΔΔCT method and correlated to histopathological stage and grade. Pathological assessment was performed by an experienced uropathologist. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS software JMP 9.0.0 version and GraphPad Prism 5.04. Of 381 cases of NMIBC, samples of 100 pTa and 255 pT1 cases were included in the final study. Spearman rank correlation revealed significant correlations between grade and expression of MKI67 (r = 0.52, p < 0.0001), ESR1 (r = 0.25, p < 0.0001), and ERBB2 (r = 0.18, p = 0.0008). In Mann-Whitney tests, MKI67 was significantly different between all grades (p < 0.0001), while ESR1 (p = 0.0006) and ERBB2 (p = 0.027) were significantly different between G2 and G3. Higher expression of MKI67 (r = 0.49; p < 0.0001), ERBB2 (r = 0.22; p < 0.0001), and ESR1 (r = 0.18; p = 0.0009) mRNA was positively correlated with higher stage. MKI67 (p < 0.0001), ERBB2 (p = 0.0058), and PGR (p = 0.0007) were significantly different between pTa and pT1. In NMIBC expression of ESR1, ERBB2 and MKI67 are significantly different between stage and grade. This potentially provides objective parameters for pathological evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ESR1/ER:

Estrogen receptor alpha

ERBB2/HER2:

erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

Cq:

Quantification cycle

FFPE:

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded

GOI:

Gene of interest

HR:

Hazard ratio

mRNA:

Messenger ribonucleic acid

MKI67/Ki67:

Marker of proliferation Ki-67

PGR/PgR:

Progesterone receptor

REF:

Reference gene

RT-qPCR:

Reverse transcription quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:359–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BW, Comperat E, Sylvester RJ, Kaasinen E, Böhle A, Palou Redorta J, Roupret M (2013) EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol 64:639–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prout GR Jr, Barton BA, Griffin PP, Friedell GH (1992) Treated history of noninvasive grade 1 transitional cell carcinoma. The National Bladder Cancer Group. J Urol 148:1413–1419

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Otto W, Denzinger S, Fritsche HM, Burger M, Rößler W, Bertz S, May M, Hartmann A, Hofstädter F, Wieland WF, Eder F (2013) Introduction and first clinical application of a simplified immunohistochemical validation system confirms prognostic impact of KI-67 and CK20 for stage T1 urothelial bladder carcinoma: single-center analysis of eight biomarkers in a series of three hundred six patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11:537–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden A, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, Newling DW, Kurth K (2006) Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta, T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 49:466–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Limas C, Bigler A, Bair R, Bernhart P, Reddy P (1993) Proliferative activity of urothelial neoplasms: comparison of BrdU incorporation, Ki67 expression, and nucleolar organiser regions. J Clin Pathol 46:159–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang L, Feng C, Ding G, Ding Q, Zhou Z, Jiang H, Wu Z (2014) Ki67 and TP53 expressions predict recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Tumour Biol 35:2989–2995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2014) Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature 507:315–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi W, Porter S, Kim S, Willis D, Plimack ER, Hoffman-Censits J, Roth B, Cheng T, Tran M, Lee IL, Melquist J, Bondaruk J, Majewski T, Zhang S, Pretzsch S, Baggerly K, Siefker-Radtke A, Czerniak B, Dinney CP, McConkey DJ (2014) Identification of distinct basal and luminal subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with different sensitivities to frontline chemotherapy. Cancer Cell 25:152–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sjödahl G, Lauss M, Lövgren K, Chebil G, Gudjonsson S, Veerla S, Patschan O, Aine M, Fernö M, Ringnér M, Månsson W, Liedberg F, Lindgren D, Höglund M (2012) A molecular taxonomy for urothelial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 18:3377–3386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Otto W, Denzinger S, Fritsche HM, Burger M, Wieland WF, Hofstädter F, Hartmann A, Bertz S (2011) The WHO classification of 1973 is more suitable than the WHO classification of 2004 for predicting survival in pT1 urothelial bladder cancer. BJU Int 107:404–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodríguez-Alonso A, Pita-Fernández S, González-Carreró J, Nogueira-March JL (2002) p53 and ki67 expression as prognostic factors for cancer-related survival in stage T1 transitional cell bladder carcinoma. Eur Urol 41:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopez-Beltran A, Luque RJ, Alvarez-Kindelan J, Quintero A, Merlo F, Carrasco JC, Requena MJ, Montironi R (2004) Prognostic factors in stage T1 grade 3 bladder cancer survival: the role of G1-S modulators (p53, p21Waf1, p27kip1, Cyclin D1, and Cyclin D3) and proliferation index (ki67-MIB1). Eur Urol 45:606–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gontero P, Gillo A, Fiorito C, Oderda M, Pacchioni D, Casetta G, Peraldo F, Zitella A, Tizzani A, Ricceri F (2014) Prognostic factors of ‘high-grade’ Ta bladder cancers according to the WHO 2004 classification: are these equivalent to ‘high-risk’ non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer? Urol Int 92:136–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar S, Prajapati O, Vaiphei K, Parmar KM, Sriharsha AS, Singh SK (2015) Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu overexpression in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and its prognostic significance: is it worth hype? South Asian J Cancer 4:115–117

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jalali Nadoushan MR, Taheri T, Jouian N, Zaeri F (2007) Overexpression of HER-2/neu oncogene and transitional cell carcinoma of bladder. Urol J 4:151–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao J, Xu W, Zhang Z, Song R, Zeng S, Sun Y, Xu C (2015) Prognostic role of HER2 expression in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol 47:87–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Amsellem-Ouazana D, Bièche I, Molinié V, Elie C, Vieillefond A, Tozlu S, Botto H, Debré B, Lidereau R (2006) Is quantitative real-time RT-PCR an adjunct to immunohistochemistry for the evaluation of ErbB2 status in transitional carcinoma of the bladder? Eur Urol 49:1035–1042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen PC, Yu HJ, Chang YH, Pan CC (2013) Her2 amplification distinguishes a subset of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers with a high risk of progression. J Clin Pathol 66:113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Iyer G, Al-Ahmadie H, Schultz N, Hanrahan AJ, Ostrovnaya I, Balar AV, Kim PH, Lin O, Weinhold N, Sander C, Zabor EC, Janakiraman M, Garcia-Grossman IR, Heguy A, Viale A, Bochner BH, Reuter VE, Bajorin DF, Milowsky MI, Taylor BS, Solit DB (2013) Prevalence and co-occurrence of actionable genomic alterations in high-grade bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:3133–3140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rajjayabun PH, Keegan PE, Lunec J, Mellon JK (2005) erbB receptor expression patterns in human bladder cancer. Urology 66:196–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tan W, Boorjian S, Advani P, Farmer S, Lohse C, Cheville J, Kwon E, Leibovich B (2015) The estrogen pathway: estrogen receptor-α, progesterone receptor, and estrogen receptor-β expression in radical cystectomy urothelial cell carcinoma specimens. Clin Genitourin Cancer 13:476–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shen SS, Smith CL, Hsieh JT, Yu J, Kim IY, Jian W, Sonpavde G, Ayala GE, Younes M, Lerner SP (2006) Expression of estrogen receptors-alpha and -beta in bladder cancer cell lines and human bladder tumor tissue. Cancer 106:2610–2616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hsu I, Vitkus S, Da J, Yeh S (2013) Role of oestrogen receptors in bladder cancer development. Nat Rev Urol 10:317–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Teng J, Wang ZY, Jarrard DF, Bjorling DE (2008) Roles of estrogen receptor alpha and beta in modulating urothelial cell proliferation. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:351–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoffman KL, Lerner SP, Smith CL (2013) Raloxifene inhibits growth of RT4 urothelial carcinoma cells via estrogen receptor-dependent induction of apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation. Horm Cancer 4:24–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sefanie Herlein for excellent technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Breyer.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in the study.

Funding

The work on this topic was funded by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe), grant number 110,541.

Conflict of interest

RMW and SE are founders of STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH. RMW is an employee of STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH. ML and KS are employees of BioNTech Diagnostics GmbH.

Additional information

Johannes Breyer, Ralph M. Wirtz, Philipp Erben, Maximilian Christian Kriegmair, Maximilian Burger Arndt Hartmann, and Wolfgang Otto - on behalf of the BRIDGE Consortium

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Breyer, J., Wirtz, R.M., Laible, M. et al. ESR1, ERBB2, and Ki67 mRNA expression predicts stage and grade of non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (NMIBC). Virchows Arch 469, 547–552 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-2002-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-2002-1

Keywords

Navigation