Skip to main content
Log in

Giant cell rich osteosarcoma revisited—diagnostic criteria and histopathologic patterns, Ki67, CDK4, and MDM2 expression, changes in response to bisphosphonate and denosumab treatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Defining giant cell-rich osteosarcoma (GCRO) as “an osteosarcoma in which more than 50% of the tumor consists of numerous uniformly distributed osteoclastic giant cells amidst oval or spindle mononuclear cells embedded in a fibrovascular stroma,” eight such cases identified among 265 cases of osteosarcoma were analysed. Their age ranges from 11 to 33 years, with peak incidence in the second decade and equal sex distribution. Seventy-five percent presented with pain, commonest in the knee, affecting the metaphysis. Most appeared radiologically as well-circumscribed expansile multiloculated osteolytic lesions, and many are displayed periosteal reaction. They showed several distinct histologic patterns: the stromal and giant cell, fibrohistiocytic, aneurysmal-cystic, osteoblastoma-like, and parosteal and fibrous dysplasia-like patterns. Focal subtle lacelike osteoid deposition, permeative infiltration into adjacent native bony trabeculae and over 30 % Ki67 proliferative index were characteristic. There was no CDK4 and MDM2 amplification. In those having bisphosphonate and denosumab treatment, there was limited focal necrosis with reduction in the number of giant cells and broad trabecular woven bone formation but no giant osteoclast was seen. Two patients with initial diagnosis of giant cell tumor treated by curettage and local resection pursued aggressive clinical courses, died after 14 and 21 months. The others survived 12 to 110 months. GCRO accounts for about 3 % of all osteosarcomas and apart from its more frequent diaphyseal location and associated normal bone-specific alkaline phosphate levels; it shares with conventional high-grade osteosarcoma the same patient demographics, sites of occurrence, absence of CDK4 and MDM2 amplification, and probably clinical course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klein MJ, Siegal GP (2006) Osteosarcoma: anatomic and histologic variants. Am J Clin Pathol 125:555–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bathurst N, Sanerkin N (1986) Watt I Osteoclast-rich osteosarcoma. Br J Radiol 59:667–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chow LTC (2015) Fibular giant cell-rich osteosarcoma virtually indistinguishable radiographically and histopathologically from giant cell tumor—analysis of subtle differentiating features. APMIS 123(6):530–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chow LTC, Wong SKC (2015) Epiphyseal osteosarcoma revisited: four illustrative cases with unusual histopathology and literature review. APMIS 123(1):9–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang CS, Yin QH, Liao JS, Lou JH, Ding XY, Zhu YB (2013) Giant cell-rich osteosarcoma in long bones: clinical, radiological and pathological features. Radiol Med. 118(8):1324–1334. doi:10.1007/s11547-013-0936-9 Epub 2013 May 27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P, Mertens F (2013) WHO Classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, Fourth Edition., World Health Organization classification of tumors, vol Volume 5. IARC Press, Lyon, France, pp. 282–288

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rietveld LAC, Mulder JD, de la Rivière G B, van Rijssel TG (1981) Giant cell tumour: metaphyseal or epiphyseal origin? Diagn Imaging 50(6):289–293

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Picci P, Manfrini M, Zucchi V, Gherlinzoni F, Rock M, Bertoni F, Neff JR (1983) Giant-cell tumor of bone in skeletally immature patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(4):486–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kransdorf MJ, Sweet DE, Buetow PC, Giudici MA, Moser RP Jr (1992) Giant cell tumor in skeletally immature patients. Radiology 184(1):233–237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sciot R, Samson I, Dal Cin P, Lateur L, van Damme B, van den Berghe H, Desmet V (1995) Giant cell rich parosteal osteosarcoma. Histopathology 27(1):51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sato K, Yamamura S, Iwata H, Sugiura H, Nakashima N, Nagasaka T (1996) Giant cell-rich osteosarcoma: a case report. Nagoya J Med Sci 59(3–4):151–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shuhaibar H, Friedman L (1998) Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma with high-grade osteoclast-rich osteogenic sarcoma at presentation. Skelet Radiol 27(10):574–577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sundaram M, Totty WG, Kyriakos M, McDonald DJ, Merkel K (2001) Imaging findings in pseudocystic osteosarcoma. Am J Roentgenol 176(3):783–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Staals EL (2003) Giant cell-rich osteosarcoma. Orthopedics 26(2):179–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shinozaki T, Fukuda T, Watanabe H, Takagishi K (2004) Giant cell-rich osteosarcoma simulating giant cell tumor of bone. Kitakanto Med J 54:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong SJ, Kim KA, Yong HS, Choi JW, Suh SI, Lee JH, Shon WY (2005) Giant cell-rich osteosarcoma of bone. Eur J Radiol Extra 53:87–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagata S, Nishimura H, Uchida M, Hayabuchi N, Zenmyou M, Harada H (2006) Giant cell-rich osteosarcoma of the distal femur: radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Radiat Med 24(3):228–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kinoshita G, Yasoshima H (2006) Giant cell-rich tumor of the rib. J Orthop Sci 11(3):312–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gambarotti M, Donato M, Alberghini M, Vanel D (2011) A strange giant cell tumor. Eur J Radiol 77(1):3–5. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fu HH, Zhuang QW, He J, Wang LZ, He Y (2011) Giant cell-rich osteosarcoma or giant cell reparative granuloma of the mandible? J Craniofac Surg 22(3):1136–1139. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182108fbf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Verma RK, Gupta G, Bal A, Yadav J (2011) Primary giant cell rich osteosarcoma of maxilla: an unusual case report. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10(2):159–162. doi:10.1007/s12663-010-0066-z Epub 2011 Mar 25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Imran AA, Khaleel ME, Salaria SM, Hasan M (2012) Giant cell-rich osteosarcoma: unravelling an elusive, enigmatic entity. Int J Pathol 10(1):36–38

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kinra P, Valdamani S, Singh V, Dutta V (2012) Diaphyseal giant cell-rich osteosarcoma: unusual histological variant in an unusual site. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 55(4):600–602. doi:10.4103/0377-4929.107848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mariano FV, Corrêa MB, da Costa MV, de Almeida OP, Lopes MA (2013) Labial mucosa metastasis of fibule giant cell-rich osteosarcoma: an unusual presentation. Quintessence Int 44(10):783–791. doi:10.3290/j.qi.a29609

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dujardin F, Binh MB, Bouvier C, Gomez-Brouchet A, Larousserie F, Muret A, Louis-Brennetot C, Aurias A, Coindre JM, Guillou L, Pedeutour F, Duval H, Collin C, de Pinieux G (2011) MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcomas and other primary fibro-osseous lesions of the bone. Mod Pathol 24(5):624–637. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2010.229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshida A, Ushiku T, Motoi T, Beppu Y, Fukayama M, Tsuda H, Shibata T (2012) MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemical coexpression in high-grade osteosarcoma: correlation with a dedifferentiated subtype. Am J Surg Pathol 36(3):423–431. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e31824230d0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bertoni F, Bacchini P, Donati D, Martini A, Picci P, Campanacci M (1993) Osteoblastoma-like osteosarcoma. The Rizzoli Institute experience. Mod Pathol 6(6):707–716

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kurt AM, Unni KK, McLeod RA, Pritchard DJ (1990) Low-grade intraosseous osteosarcoma. Cancer 65(6):1418–1428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tse LF, Wong KC, Kumta SM, Huang L, Chow TC, Griffith JF (2008) Bisphosphonates reduce local recurrence in extremity giant cell tumor of bone: a case-control study. Bone 42(1):68–73 Epub 2007 Sep 6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fisher JE, Rodan GA, Reszka AA (2000) In vivo effects of bisphosphonates on the osteoclast mevalonate pathway. Endocrinology 141(12):4793–4796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jobke B, Milovanovic P, Amling M, Busse B (2014) Bisphosphonate-osteoclasts: changes in osteoclast morphology and function induced by antiresorptive nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate treatment in osteoporosis patients. Bone 59:37–43. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2013.10.024 Epub 2013 Nov 6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Branstetter DG, Nelson SD, Manivel JC, Blay JY, Chawla S, Thomas DM, Jun S, Jacobs I (2012) Denosumab induces tumor reduction and bone formation in patients with giant-cell tumor of bone. Clin Cancer Res 18(16):4415–4424. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0578 Epub 2012 Jun 18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wojcik J, Rosenberg AE, Bredella MA, Choy E, Hornicek FJ, Nielsen GP, Deshpande V (2016) Denosumab-treated giant cell tumor of bone exhibits morphologic overlap with malignant giant cell tumor of bone. Am J Surg Pathol 40(1):72–80. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mirabello L, Troisi RJ, Savage SA (2009) Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer 115(7):1531–1543. doi:10.1002/cncr.24121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis Tsun Cheung Chow.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that the study complies with the ethical standards required.

Funding

The author declares no funding received for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chow, L.T.C. Giant cell rich osteosarcoma revisited—diagnostic criteria and histopathologic patterns, Ki67, CDK4, and MDM2 expression, changes in response to bisphosphonate and denosumab treatment. Virchows Arch 468, 741–755 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-1926-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-1926-9

Keywords

Navigation