Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does flat epithelial atypia have rounder nuclei than columnar cell change/hyperplasia? A morphometric approach to columnar cell lesions of the breast

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Columnar cell lesions of the breast encompass columnar cell change/hyperplasia (CCC/CCH) and flat epithelial atypia (FEA). These have attracted researchers because emerging data suggest that FEA may represent the earliest histologically detectable non-obligate precursor of breast cancer. However, it is occasionally difficult to distinguish FEA from CCC/CCH because of similar histology. Although the nuclei of FEA are frequently described as relatively round compared with those of CCC/CCH, there are few morphometric studies to support this statement. The aim of this study was to provide objective data as to the nuclear shape in columnar cell lesions. As a shape descriptor, we adopted ellipticity that is defined by the formula 2b/2a, where a is the length of the long axis of the ellipse and b is the length of the short axis. Contrary to circularity, ellipticity reflects the overall configuration of an ellipse irrespective of surface irregularity. Our image analysis included generating whole slide images, extracting glandular cell nuclei, measuring nuclear ellipticity, and superimposing graded colors based on execution of results on the captured images. A total of 7917 nuclei extracted from 22 FEA images and 5010 nuclei extracted from 13 CCC/CCH images were analyzed. There was a significant difference in nuclear roundness between FEA and CCC/CCH with mean ellipticity values of 0.723 and 0.679, respectively (p < 0.001, Welch’s t test). Furthermore, FEA with malignancy had significantly rounder nuclei than FEA without malignancy (p < 0.001). Our preliminary results suggest that nuclear ellipticity is a key parameter in reproducibly classifying columnar cell lesions of the breast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schnitt SJ (2003) The diagnosis and management of pre-invasive breast disease: flat epithelial atypia—classification, pathologic features and clinical significance. Breast Cancer Res 5:263–268. doi:10.1186/bcr625

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lerwill MF (2008) Flat epithelial atypia of the breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:615–621. doi:10.1043/1543-2165(2008)132[615:FEAOTB]2.0.CO;2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ (2012) WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast, Fourth Edition, Internatioal Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon

  4. Turashvili G, Hayes M, Gilks B, Watson P, Aparicio S (2008) Are columnar cell lesions the earliest histologically detectable non-obligate precursor of breast cancer? Virchows Arch 452:589–598. doi:10.1007/s00428-008-0609-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moinfar F (2009) Flat ductal intraepithelial neoplasia of the breast: a review of diagnostic criteria, differential diagnoses, molecular-genetic findings, and clinical relevance–it is time to appreciate the Azzopardi concept! Arch Pathol Lab Med 133:879–892. doi:10.1043/1543-2165-133.6.879

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Malley FP, Mohsin SK, Badve S, Bose S, Collins LC, Ennis M, Kleer CG, Pinder SE, Schnitt SJ (2006) Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia of the breast. Mod Pathol 19:172–179. doi:10.1038/modpathol.3800514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomes DS, Porto SS, Balabram D, Gobbi H (2014) Inter-observer variability between general pathologists and a specialist in breast pathology in the diagnosis of lobular neoplasia, columnar cell lesions, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Diagn Pathol 9:121. doi:10.1186/1746-1596-9-121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim CN, Ho BC, Bay BH, Yip G, Tan PH (2006) Nuclear morphometry in columnar cell lesions of the breast: is it useful? J Clin Pathol 59:1283–1286. doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.035428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams PA, Djordjevic B, Ayroud Y, Islam S, Gravel D, Robertson SJ, Parra-Herran C (2014) Nuclear morphometry in flat epithelial atypia of the breast as a predictor of malignancy: a digital image-based histopathologic analysis. Anal Quant Cytopathol Histopathol 36:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cosatto E, Laquerre P-F, Malon C, Graf H-P, Saito A, Kiyuna T, Marugame A, Kamijo Ki (2013) Automated gastric cancer diagnosis on H&E-stained sections; training a classifier on a large scale with multiple instance machine learning. SPIE Medical Imaging, pp. 867605–867601–867609

  11. Keys R, Robert G (1981) Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Transac on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing IEEE 29:1153–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Soille P (1999) Morphological image analysis: principles and applications. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Serra J (1982) Image analysis and mathematical morphology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vincent L (1993) Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms. IEEE Transaction on Image Process 2:176–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Welch BL (1947) The generalization of student’s problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34:28–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. R Development Core Team (2005) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org.

  17. Yagi Y (2011) Color standardization and optimization in whole slide imaging. Diagn Pathol 6(Suppl 1):S15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Webster M, Witkin KL, Cohen-Fix O (2009) Sizing up the nucleus: nuclear shape, size and nuclear-envelope assembly. J Cell Sci 122:1477–1486. doi:10.1242/jcs.037333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ms. Mayumi Kataoka for her administrative assistance and Dr. Ahmed Ali Elsayed Ali for his careful reading of our manuscript and for providing useful comments. This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Clinical Research from the National Hospital Organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu Ichihara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamashita, Y., Ichihara, S., Moritani, S. et al. Does flat epithelial atypia have rounder nuclei than columnar cell change/hyperplasia? A morphometric approach to columnar cell lesions of the breast. Virchows Arch 468, 663–673 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-1923-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-016-1923-z

Keywords

Navigation