Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Challenges for quality management in implementation, maintenance, and sustainability of research tissue biobanks

  • Annual Review Issue
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Availability of high-quality human tissue samples and access to associated histopathological and clinical data is essential for basic and translational biomedical research, especially in areas of personalized medicine, drug, and biomarker development and mechanistically oriented biomedical research projects. Therefore, it is pivotal to establish and maintain quality-assured tissue biobanks that provide high-quality biomaterial to research thereby increasing the impact and reliability of scientific results. Quality concerns do not only address the biomaterial specimen itself but include all biobanking-related procedures. Tissue biobanks thus face essential challenges that encompass the implementation of adequate structural components, documentation of tissue sample collection and storage (procedures), as well as data and project management and IT. An integral and indispensable component of tissue biobanks is expert-driven evaluation (entry and exit controls) of tissue specimen to guarantee provision of high-quality assured biomaterials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shickle D, Griffin M, El-Arifi K (2010) Inter- and intra-biobank networks: classification of biobanks. Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology 77(4):181–190. doi:10.1159/000292651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hallmans G, Vaught JB (2011) Best practices for establishing a biobank. Methods Mol Biol 675:241–260. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goebel JW, Pickardt T, Bedau M, Fuchs M, Lenk C, Paster I, Spranger TM, Stockter U, Bauer U, Cooper DN, Krawczak M (2010) Legal and ethical consequences of international biobanking from a national perspective: the German BMB-EUCoop project. Eur J Hum Genet 18(5):522–525. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.214

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cordell S (2011) The biobank as an ethical subject. Health Care Anal : HCA : J Health Philo Policy 19(3):282–294. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0180-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vaught J, Lockhart NC (2012) The evolution of biobanking best practices. Clin Chim Acta 413(19–20):1569–1575. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2012.04.030

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hewitt RE (2011) Biobanking: the foundation of personalized medicine. Curr Opin Oncol 23(1):112–119. doi:10.1097/CCO.0b013e32834161b8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lehmann S, Guadagni F, Moore H, Ashton G, Barnes M, Benson E, Clements J, Koppandi I, Coppola D, Demiroglu SY, DeSouza Y, De Wilde A, Duker J, Eliason J, Glazer B, Harding K, Jeon JP, Kessler J, Kokkat T, Nanni U, Shea K, Skubitz A, Somiari S, Tybring G, Gunter E, Betsou International Society For B, Environmental Repositories Isber Working Group On Biospecimen Science F (2012) Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: review and implementation of the sample PREanalytical code (SPREC). Biopreserv Biobanking 10(4):366–374. doi:10.1089/bio.2012.0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Betsou F, Lehmann S, Ashton G, Barnes M, Benson EE, Coppola D, DeSouza Y, Eliason J, Glazer B, Guadagni F, Harding K, Horsfall DJ, Kleeberger C, Nanni U, Prasad A, Shea K, Skubitz A, Somiari S, Gunter E, International Society for B, Environmental Repositories Working Group on Biospecimen S (2010) Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: defining the sample PREanalytical code. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19(4):1004–1011. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1268, A Publication of The American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore HM, Kelly AB, Jewell SD, McShane LM, Clark DP, Greenspan R, Hayes DF, Hainaut P, Kim P, Mansfield EA, Potapova O, Riegman P, Rubinstein Y, Seijo E, Somiari S, Watson P, Weier HU, Zhu C, Vaught J (2011) Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ). Cancer Cytopathol 119(2):92–101. doi:10.1002/cncy.20147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Steg A, Wang W, Blanquicett C, Grunda JM, Eltoum IA, Wang K, Buchsbaum DJ, Vickers SM, Russo S, Diasio RB, Frost AR, LoBuglio AF, Grizzle WE, Johnson MR (2006) Multiple gene expression analyses in paraffin-embedded tissues by TaqMan low-density array: application to hedgehog and Wnt pathway analysis in ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma. J Mol Diagn: JMD 8(1):76–83. doi:10.2353/jmoldx.2006.040402

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grizzle WE, Bell WC, Sexton KC (2010) Issues in collecting, processing and storing human tissues and associated information to support biomedical research. Cancer Biomark 9(1–6):531–549. doi:10.3233/CBM-2011-0183, Section A of Disease markers

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grizzle WE, Sexton KC, Bell WC (2008) Quality assurance in tissue resources supporting biomedical research. Cell Preserv Technol 6(2):113–118. doi:10.1089/cpt.2008.9993

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simeon-Dubach D, Burt AD, Hall PA (2012) Quality really matters: the need to improve specimen quality in biomedical research. J Pathol 228(4):431–433. doi:10.1002/path.4117

  14. Herpel E, Koleganova N, Schreiber B, Walter B, Kalle CV, Schirmacher P (2012) Structural requirements of research tissue banks derived from standardized project surveillance. Virchows Arch 461(1):79–86. doi:10.1007/s00428-012-1258-3, An International Journal of Pathology

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herpel E, Rocken C, Manke H, Schirmacher P, Flechtenmacher C (2010) Quality management and accreditation of research tissue banks: experience of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg. Virchows Arch 457(6):741–747. doi:10.1007/s00428-010-0998-1, An International Journal of Pathology

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Herpel E, Roecken C, Manke H, Schirmacher P, Flechtenmacher C (2011) Letter to the editor—reply to comments of Carter et al. Virchows Arch 458(2):249–250. doi:10.1007/s00428-010-1029-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ISO (2015) http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards_development/list_of_iso_technical_committees/iso_technical_committee.htm?commid=4514241

  18. Bell WC, Sexton KC, Grizzle WE (2009) How to efficiently obtain human tissues to support specific biomedical research projects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(6):1676–1679. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0820, A Publication of The American Association for Cancer Research, Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Simeon-Dubach D, Perren A (2011) Better provenance for biobank samples. Nature 475(7357):454–455. doi:10.1038/475454d

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McDonald SA, Watson MA, Rossi J, Becker CM, Jaques DP, Pfeifer JD (2011) A new paradigm for biospecimen banking in the personalized medicine era. Am J Clin Pathol 136(5):679–684. doi:10.1309/AJCP7DWCQ1SWJTWU

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baker M (2012) Biorepositories: building better biobanks. Nature 486(7401):141–146. doi:10.1038/486141a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bevilacqua G, Bosman F, Dassesse T, Hofler H, Janin A, Langer R, Larsimont D, Morente MM, Riegman P, Schirmacher P, Stanta G, Zatloukal K, Caboux E, Hainaut P (2010) The role of the pathologist in tissue banking: European Consensus Expert Group report. Virchows Arch 456(4):449–454. doi:10.1007/s00428-010-0887-7, An International Journal of Pathology

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Herpel E, Hummel M (2013) Research biobanks—development and structure. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 138(20):1069–1072. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1343143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Watson P (2002) The importance of tumor banking: bridging no-mans-land in cancer research. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2(1):1–3. doi:10.1586/14737140.2.1.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Henry NL, Hayes DF (2012) Cancer biomarkers. Mol Oncol 6(2):140–146. doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2012.01.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Simeon-Dubach D, Watson P (2014) Biobanking 3.0: evidence based and customer focused biobanking. Clin Biochem 47(4–5):300–308. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.12.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Watson PH, Nussbeck SY, Carter C, O'Donoghue S, Cheah S, Matzke LAM, Barnes RO, Bartlett J, Carpenter J, Grizzle WE, Johnston RN, Mes-Masson A-M, Murphy L, Sexton K, Shepherd L, Simeon-Dubach D, Zeps N, Schacter B (2014) A framework for biobank sustainability. Biopreserv Biobanking 12(1):60–68. doi:10.1089/bio.2013.0064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cambon-Thomsen A (2003) Assessing the impact of biobanks. Nat Genet 34(1):25–26. doi:10.1038/ng0503-25b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hofman V, Ilie M, Long E, Washetine K, Chabannon C, Figarella-Branger D, Clement B, Mabile L, Cambon-Thomsen A, Boucher P, Dagher G, Hewitt R, Parodi B, Hofman P (2013) Measuring the contribution of tumor biobanks to research in oncology: surrogate indicators and bibliographic output. Biopreserv Biobanking 11(4):235–244. doi:10.1089/bio.2013.0015

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    P. Schirmacher & E. Herpel

  2. NCT Tissue Bank, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    S. Schmitt, K. Kynast & E. Herpel

Authors
  1. S. Schmitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Kynast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Schirmacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Herpel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Herpel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmitt, S., Kynast, K., Schirmacher, P. et al. Challenges for quality management in implementation, maintenance, and sustainability of research tissue biobanks. Virchows Arch 468, 93–99 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1825-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-015-1825-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation