Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of COBAS 4800 KRAS, TaqMan PCR and High Resolution Melting PCR assays for the detection of KRAS somatic mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded colorectal carcinomas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies documented the influence of KRAS mutation status on the response of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. The COBAS 4800 KRAS is an assay using real time PCR and TaqMelt technology, CE-IVD validated, for the detection of 19 KRAS somatic mutations in exons 2 and 3. We compared COBAS with previously validated PCR TaqMan and High Resolution Melting (HRM) assays on 156 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) specimens of colorectal carcinoma. DNA extraction procedures, using the Qiagen QiAMP kit and the Roche COBAS DNA kit, were also compared. Of the 156 samples, 132 were interpretable using COBAS and TaqMan and 92 using COBAS and HRM. No statistically significant difference was found between COBAS/TaqMan and COBAS/HRM (k = 0.937; p < 0.001 — four discordant cases were found, mostly concerning codon 61 mutations and k = 0.891; p < 0.001 — five discordant cases were found, three regarding codon 61 and two on codon 12/13, respectively). No difference was found between the two DNA extraction methods (t = 1.7185; dol = 39; α = 5 %). The three assays were found suitable to detect accurately KRAS mutations in colon FFPE specimens. COBAS and TaqMan were found to be more robust than HRM, as they yielded fewer non-interpretable results. DNA extraction kits were found to provide equivalent results. The present study shows that pre-screening using COBAS with further TaqMan mutation characterization constitutes an easy and reliable approach for routine diagnostic purposes

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman DJ, Juan T, Sikorski R, Suggs S, Radinsky R, Patterson SD, Chang DD (2008) Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(10):1626–1634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J, Janssens M, De Hertogh G, Personeni N, Biesmans B, Van Laethem JL, Peeters M, Humblet Y, Van Cutsem E, Tejpar S (2008) KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol 19(3):508–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V, Cayre A, Le Corre D, Buc E, Ychou M, Bouche O, Landi B, Louvet C, Andre T, Bibeau F, Diebold MD, Rougier P, Ducreux M, Tomasic G, Emile JF, Penault-Llorca F, Laurent-Puig P (2008) KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 26(3):374–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, Boige V, Landi B, Emile JF, Cote JF, Tomasic G, Penna C, Ducreux M, Rougier P, Penault-Llorca F, Laurent-Puig P (2006) KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 66(8):3992–3995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Langer C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359(17):1757–1765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibson NJ (2006) The use of real-time PCR methods in DNA sequence variation analysis. Clin Chim Acta 363(1–2):32–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krypuy M, Newnham GM, Thomas DM, Conron M, Dobrovic A (2006) High resolution melting analysis for the rapid and sensitive detection of mutations in clinical samples: KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 6:295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hancer VS, Buyukdogan M, Turkmen I, Bassullu N, Altug T, Diz-Kucukkaya R, Bulbul-Dogusoy G, Demir G (2011) Comparison of KRAS mutation tests in colorectal cancer patients. Genet Test Mol Biomark 15(11):831–834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobunai T, Watanabe T, Yamamoto Y, Eshima K (2010) The frequency of KRAS mutation detection in human colon carcinoma is influenced by the sensitivity of assay methodology: a comparison between direct sequencing and real-time PCR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 395(1):158–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Krieken H, Tol J (2009) Setting future standards for KRAS testing in colorectal cancer. Pharmacogenomics 10(1):1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee S, Brophy VH, Cao J, Velez M, Hoeppner C, Soviero S, Lawrence HJ (2011) Analytical performance of a PCR assay for the detection of KRAS mutations (codons 12/13 and 61) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples of colorectal carcinoma. Virchows 460(2):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Custodio A, Feliu J (2012) Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: beyond KRAS mutations. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 28

  14. Vaughn CP, Zobell SD, Furtado LV, Baker CL, Samowitz WS (2011) Frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations in colorectal cancer. Gene Chromosome Canc 50(5):307–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Loupakis F, Ruzzo A, Cremolini C, Vincenzi B, Salvatore L, Santini D, Masi G, Stasi I, Canestrari E, Rulli E, Floriani I, Bencardino K, Galluccio N, Catalano V, Tonini G, Magnani M, Fontanini G, Basolo F, Falcone A, Graziano F (2009) KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 101(4):715–721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Hartmann JT, de Braud F, Schuch G, Zubel A, Celik I, Schlichting M, Koralewski P (2011) Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study. Ann Oncol 22(7):1535–1546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Lang I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, Shchepotin I, Maurel J, Cunningham D, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Zubel A, Celik I, Rougier P, Ciardiello F (2011) Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J 29(15):2011–2019

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bokemeyer C, Cutsem EV, Rougier P, Ciardiello F, Heeger S, Schlichting M, Celik I, Kohne CH (2012) Addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy as first-line treatment for KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 2012:23

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tejpar S, Celik I, Schlichting M, Sartorius U, Bokemeyer C, Van Cutsem E (2012) Association of KRAS G13D tumor mutations with outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy with or without cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 2012:25

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dufort S, Richard MJ, de Fraipont F (2009) Pyrosequencing method to detect KRAS mutation in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. Anal Biochem 391(2):166–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A, Hartmann JT, Aparicio J, de Braud F, Donea S, Ludwig H, Schuch G, Stroh C, Loos AH, Zubel A, Koralewski P (2009) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(5):663–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M, Humblet Y, Bodoky G, Cunningham D, Jassem J, Rivera F, Kocakova I, Ruff P, Blasinska-Morawiec M, Smakal M, Canon JL, Rother M, Oliner KS, Wolf M, Gansert J (2010) Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J 28(31):4697–4705

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Malapelle U, Carlomagno C, Salatiello M, De Stefano A, De Luca C, Bianco R, Marciano R, Cimminiello C, Bellevicine C, De Placido S, Troncone G (2012) KRAS mutation detection by high-resolution melting analysis significantly predicts clinical benefit of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2012(17):275

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bellon E, Ligtenberg MJ, Tejpar S, Cox K, de Hertogh G, de Stricker K, Edsjo A, Gorgoulis V, Hofler G, Jung A, Kotsinas A, Laurent-Puig P, Lopez-Rios F, Hansen TP, Rouleau E, Vandenberghe P, van Krieken JJ, Dequeker E (2011) External quality assessment for KRAS testing is needed: setup of a European program and report of the first joined regional quality assessment rounds. Oncologist 16(4):467–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dequeker E, Ligtenberg MJ, Vander Borght S, van Krieken JH (2011) Mutation analysis of KRAS prior to targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: development and evaluation of quality by a European external quality assessment scheme. Virchows 459(2):155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tougeron D, Lecomte T, Pages J-C, Collin C, Villalva C, Ferru A, Tourani J-M, Silvain C, Levillain P, Karayan-Tapon L (2012) Effect of low-frequency KRAS mutations on the response to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(suppl; abstr 3520)

  27. De Roock W, Jonker DJ, Di Nicolantonio F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Tu D, Siena S, Lamba S, Arena S, Frattini M, Piessevaux H, Van Cutsem E, O'Callaghan CJ, Khambata-Ford S, Zalcberg JR, Simes J, Karapetis CS, Bardelli A, Tejpar S (2010) Association of KRAS p.G13D mutation with outcome in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Jama 304(16):1812–1820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gajate P, Sastre J, Bando I, Alonso T, Cillero L, Sanz J, Caldes T, Diaz-Rubio E (2012) Influence of KRAS p.G13D mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2012:24

    Google Scholar 

  29. Der CJ, Finkel T, Cooper GM (1986) Biological and biochemical properties of human rasH genes mutated at codon 61. Cell 44(1):167–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, De Schutter J, Biesmans B, Fountzilas G, Kalogeras KT, Kotoula V, Papamichael D, Laurent-Puig P, Penault-Llorca F, Rougier P, Vincenzi B, Santini D, Tonini G, Cappuzzo F, Frattini M, Molinari F, Saletti P, De Dosso S, Martini M, Bardelli A, Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Tabernero J, Macarulla T, Di Fiore F, Gangloff AO, Ciardiello F, Pfeiffer P, Qvortrup C, Hansen TP, Van Cutsem E, Piessevaux H, Lambrechts D, Delorenzi M, Tejpar S (2010) Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol 11(8):753–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lievre A, Artru P, Guiu M, Laurent-Puig P, Merlin J-L, Sabourin J-C, Viguier J, Bastie A, Seronde A, Ducreux M (2012) Review of the current status of KRAS mutation testing in France in 2011: the Flash-KRAS study. J Clin Oncol 30(suppl; abstr e14129)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the “Ligue contre le cancer“ for supporting this work, to Dr. Hélène Blons (Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France) for kindly providing KRAS mutated positive controls.

Disclosures

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de Biopathologie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne – CS 30519, 54519, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex, France

    Alexandre Harlé, Marie Rouyer, Pascal Genin, Agnès Leroux & Jean-Louis Merlin

  2. CNRS, UMR 7039 CRAN, Nancy, France

    Alexandre Harlé, Agnès Leroux & Jean-Louis Merlin

  3. Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France

    Alexandre Harlé, Agnès Leroux & Jean-Louis Merlin

  4. UJF Grenoble 1/Inserm U823, Grenoble, France

    Benoit Busser

  5. Département de biostatistiques, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France

    Valentin Harter

Authors
  1. Alexandre Harlé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benoit Busser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marie Rouyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Valentin Harter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pascal Genin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Agnès Leroux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jean-Louis Merlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Harlé.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harlé, A., Busser, B., Rouyer, M. et al. Comparison of COBAS 4800 KRAS, TaqMan PCR and High Resolution Melting PCR assays for the detection of KRAS somatic mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded colorectal carcinomas. Virchows Arch 462, 329–335 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-013-1380-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-013-1380-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation