Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mucosal carcinoma of the fallopian tube coexists with ovarian cancer of serous subtype only: a study of Japanese cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies in Western countries have revealed that mucosal carcinoma of the fallopian tube frequently coexists with pelvic (ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal) serous carcinomas, and early tubal carcinoma is now regarded as a possible origin of these tumors. However, the relationship between early tubal carcinoma and non-serous ovarian cancer, such as clear cell adenocarcinoma, has not been studied in detail. In this study, we sought to examine the coexistence of mucosal carcinoma of the fallopian tube in Japanese ovarian cancer cases. We submitted the fallopian tubes in toto for histological examination in 52 ovarian carcinoma cases and three peritoneal serous carcinoma cases. The ovarian tumors included 12 serous adenocarcinomas, 23 clear cell adenocarcinomas, nine endometrioid adenocarcinomas, three mucinous adenocarcinomas, and four mixed epithelial carcinomas. Mucosal carcinoma of the fallopian tube did not coexist with non-serous adenocarcinoma (n = 40). In contrast, mucosal carcinoma of the fallopian tube was observed in six cases of ovarian serous adenocarcinoma and one case of peritoneal serous adenocarcinoma. In these cases, the p53 immunophenotypes were similar in tubal lesions and invasive ovarian or peritoneal carcinomas. Tumors were negative for p53 in four of seven cases, and one of the p53-negative serous adenocarcinomas showed low-grade morphology. We believe that some ovarian and peritoneal serous adenocarcinomas develop from early tubal carcinomas. However, it should be noted that early tubal carcinomas are not always p53-positive immunohistochemically. Finally, it is unlikely that early tubal lesions are involved in the carcinogenesis of clear cell adenocarcinoma and other non-serous adenocarcinomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seidman JD, Russell P, Kurman RJ (2002) Surface epithelial tumors of the ovary. In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract, 5th edn. Springer, New York, pp 873–878

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fukunaga M, Nomura K, Ishikawa E et al (1997) Ovarian atypical endometriosis: its close association with malignant epithelial tumours. Histopathology 30:249–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Okuda T, Otsuka J, Sekizawa A et al (2003) p53 mutations and overexpression affect prognosis of ovarian endometrioid cancer but not clear cell cancer. Gynecol Oncol 88:318–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Modesitt SC, Tortolero-Luna G, Robinson JB et al (2002) Ovarian and extraovarian endometriosis-associated cancer. Obstet Gynecol 100:788–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malpica A (2008) Grading of ovarian cancer: a histotype-specific approach. Int J Gynecol Pathol 27:175–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shih IM, Kurman RJ (2004) Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol 164:1511–1518

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee Y, Medeiros F, Kindelberger D et al (2006) Advances in the recognition of tubal intraepithelial carcinoma: applications to cancer screening and the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Adv Anat Pathol 13:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salvador S, Rempel A, Soslow RA et al (2008) Chromosomal instability in fallopian tube precursor lesions of serous carcinoma and frequent monoclonality of synchronous ovarian and fallopian tube mucosal serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 110:408–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Medeiros F, Muto MG, Lee Y et al (2006) The tubal fimbria is a preferred site for early adenocarcinoma in women with familial ovarian cancer syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol 30:230–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kindelberger DW, Lee Y, Miron A et al (2007) Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: evidence for a causal relationship. Am J Surg Pathol 31:161–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee Y, Miron A, Drapkin R et al (2007) A candidate precursor to serous carcinoma that originates in the distal fallopian tube. J Pathol 211:26–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Crum CP, Drapkin R, Miron A et al (2007) The distal fallopian tube: a new model for pelvic serous carcinogenesis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jarboe E, Folkins A, Nucci MR et al (2008) Serous carcinogenesis in the fallopian tube: a descriptive classification. Int J Gynecol Pathol 27:1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levanon K, Crum C, Drapkin R (2008) New insights into the pathogenesis of serous ovarian cancer and its clinical impact. J Clin Oncol 26:5284–5293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roh MH, Kindelberger D, Crum CP (2009) Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and the dominant ovarian mass: clues to serous tumor origin? Am J Surg Pathol 33:376–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Powell CB, Kenley E, Chen LM et al (2005) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: role of serial sectioning in the detection of occult malignancy. J Clin Oncol 23:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Finch A, Shaw P, Rosen B et al (2006) Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Gynecol Oncol 100:58–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Colgan TJ, Murphy J, Cole DE et al (2001) Occult carcinoma in prophylactic oophorectomy specimens: prevalence and association with BRCA germline mutation status. Am J Surg Pathol 25:1283–1289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugiyama T, Kamura T, Kigawa J et al (2000) Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer 88:2584–2589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Itamochi H, Kigawa J, Terakawa N (2008) Mechanisms of chemoresistance and poor prognosis in ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci 99:653–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Katabuchi H, Takano M, Udagawa Y (2008) Clinical conference: clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 60:224–228

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd et al (2000) FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO committee on gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 70:209–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (eds) (2003) Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  24. Malpica A, Deavers MT, Lu K et al (2004) Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system. Am J Surg Pathol 28:496–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Anttila MA, Ji H, Juhola MT et al (1999) The prognostic significance of p53 expression quantitated by computerized image analysis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Pathol 18:42–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobel M, Kalloger SE, Carrick J et al (2009) A limited panel of immunomarkers can reliably distinguish between clear cell and high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Am J Surg Pathol 33:14–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Holstege H, Joose SA, van Oostrom CTM et al (2009) High incidence of protein-truncating TP53 mutations in BRCA1-related breast cancer. Cancer Res 69:3625–3633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaw PA, Rouzbahman M, Pizer ES et al (2009) Candidate serous cancer precursors in fallopian tube epithelium of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Mod Pathol 22:1133–1138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Boyd J (2003) Specific keynote: hereditary ovarian cancer: what we know. Gynecol Oncol 88:S8–S10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaw PA, McLaughlin JR, Zweemer RP et al (2002) Histopathologic features of genetically determined ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Pathol 21:407–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schorge JO, Muto MG, Welch WR et al (1998) Molecular evidence for multifocal papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum in patients with germline BRCA1 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:841–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Maeda D, Takazawa Y, Ota S et al (2010) Bilateral microscopic adenocarcinoma of the fallopian tubes detected by an endometrial cytologic smear. Int J Gynecol Pathol 29:273–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the faculty and resident staff in the Department of Pathology at the University of Tokyo Hospital and Mitsui Memorial Hospital, especially Hideki Miyazaki and Masako Ikemura, for their assistance with the extensive sectioning of the fallopian tubes.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masashi Fukayama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maeda, D., Ota, S., Takazawa, Y. et al. Mucosal carcinoma of the fallopian tube coexists with ovarian cancer of serous subtype only: a study of Japanese cases. Virchows Arch 457, 597–608 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-010-0979-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-010-0979-4

Keywords

Navigation