Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Indian ink vs tissue marking dye: a quantitative comparison of two widely used macroscopical staining tool

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evaluation of the surgical margins is a major concern in surgical pathology, and marking of surgical margins with substances such as alcian blue, Tipp-ex, artist's pigments, colored gelatin, starch, erythrocyte layers, etc. was recommended for this purpose; Indian ink and tissue marking dyes are widely used. As there is no systematic study comparing tissue marking dyes and Indian ink as the most common substances used for the purpose, this study was conducted to compare the two. Penetration into the tissue, brightness under the microscope, the spreading area of one drop of dye on tissue paper, the intensity of colors, and unit price were compared for each of the five colors of Rotring's Indian ink and Thermo–Shandon's tissue marking dyes, applied on reduction mammoplasty specimens. Rotring's Indian ink is proved to be just as effective as Thermo–Shandon's tissue marking dye and bares the majority of the characteristics of a perfect staining substance, which are easily applied, quickly fixed, durable and cheap, contain no potential contaminants, be work safe, would not smudge/stain surrounding tissues, and look bright under the microscope without obscuring the view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dimenstein IB (2009) Grossing biopsies: an introduction to general principles and techniques. Ann Diagn Pathol 13:106–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong JS, Weinzwieg IP, Davies JD (1990) Differential marking of excision planes in screened breast lesions by organically coloured gelatins. J Clin Pathol 43:604–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan KW, Lui I, Chung WB (1989) Marking planes of surgical excision on specimens with mixture of India ink and acetone. J Clin Pathol 42:893

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiam HW, Maslen PG, Hoffman GJ (2003) Marking the surgical margins of specimens: commercial acrylic pigments are reliable, rapid and safe. Pathology 35:204–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke TJ (1991) Differential marking of surgical excision planes. J Clin Pathol 44:87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris MD (1990) Tipp-ex fluid: convenient marker for surgical resection margins. J Clin Pathol 43:346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paterson DA, Davies JD (1988) Marking planes of surgical excision on breast biopsy specimens: use of artists' pigments suspended in acetone. J Clin Pathol 41:1013–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Salerno A (1998) Fixing Indian ink on resection margins. Histopathology 33:284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salerno A, Trent R, Jackson PJ, Cook MG (1995) A rapid and safe method to fix india ink on specimen resection margins. J Clin Pathol 48:689–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shinde V, Phelan C, Gater W, Thomas J (2008) Inking a specimen without the mess. J Clin Pathol 61:783

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright RG, Osborne J (1991) Modification of the alcian blue method for marking breast biopsy specimens. J Clin Pathol 44:174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter-Craig C, Lee-McDonagh B, Penman HG (1991) Marking of resection margins. J Clin Pathol 44:874–875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prophet EB, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (U.S.), American Registry of Pathology (1994) Laboratory methods in histotechnology. American Registry of Pathology, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  14. Corpas FJ, Chaki M, Fernandez-Ocana A, Valderrama R, Palma JM, Carreras A, Begara-Morales JC, Airaki M, del Rio LA, Barroso JB (2008) Metabolism of reactive nitrogen species in pea plants under abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 49:1711–1722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller L Stuff (2007) Quantifying western blots without expensive commercial quantification software. http://www.lukemiller.org/journal/2007/08/quantifying-western-blots-without.html. Accessed 10 March 2010

  16. Molavi DW (2008) Prostate. In: Molavi DW (ed) The practice of surgical pathology: a beginner's guide to the diagnostic process. Springer, New York, pp 95–106

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology, Ankara Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Bilkent Yolu No: 3, 06640, Ankara, Turkey

    Kemal Kosemehmetoglu

  2. Department of Pathology, Hacettepe University, 06100, Ankara, Turkey

    Gunes Guner & Deniz Ates

Authors
  1. Kemal Kosemehmetoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gunes Guner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deniz Ates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kemal Kosemehmetoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosemehmetoglu, K., Guner, G. & Ates, D. Indian ink vs tissue marking dye: a quantitative comparison of two widely used macroscopical staining tool. Virchows Arch 457, 21–25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-010-0941-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-010-0941-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation