Buccal capsule development as a consideration for phylogenetic analysis of Rhabditida (Nemata)

Abstract

 Bacterial feeding nematodes in the order Rhabditida including Zeldia punctata (Cephalobidae) and Caenorhabditis elegans (Rhabditidae) differ profoundly in the buccal capsule parts and associated cells. We carried out a range of tests to determine which buccal capsule parts and cells are evolutionarily homologous between the representative species of the two families. Tests included reconstruction of the buccal capsule and procorpus with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nuclei position and morphology using 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining, and cell lineage using four dimensional (4D) microscopy. The lining of the buccal capsule of Z. punctata and additional Cephalobidae includes four sets of muscular radial cells, ma, mb, mc and md, in contrast to C. elegans and additional Rhabditidae, which has two sets of epithelial cells (e1, e3) and two sets of muscle cells (m1, m2). Cell lineage of a nematode closely related to Z. punctata, Cephalobus cubaensis, supports the hypothesis that in cephalobids the e1 and e3 cells become hypodermal cells or are programmed to die. Our findings contradict all previous hypotheses of buccal capsule homology, and suggest instead that ma and mb in Z. punctata are homologous to m1 and m2 in C. elegans respectively. We also hypothesize that ma and mb could be homologous to primary and secondary sets of stylet-protractor muscle cells in the plant parasitic Tylenchida.