Development Genes and Evolution

, Volume 218, Issue 5, pp 273–279 | Cite as

Epi-illumination microscopy coupled to in situ hybridization and its utility in the study of evolution and development in non-model species

  • Madelaine E. Bartlett
  • Bruce K. Kirchoff
  • Chelsea D. Specht
Technical Note


Evolutionary developmental biology often combines methods for examining morphology (e.g., scanning electron microscopy, SEM) with analyses of gene expression (e.g., RNA in situ hybridization). Due to differences in tissue preparation for SEM and gene expression analyses, the same specimen cannot be used for both sets of techniques. To aid in the understanding of morphological variation, it would be particularly useful to have a high-magnification image of the very same sample in which gene expression is subsequently analyzed. To address this need, we developed a method that couples extended depth of field (EDF) epi-illumination microscopy to in situ hybridization in a sequential format, enabling both surface microscopy and gene expression analyses to be carried out on the same specimen. We first created a digital image of inflorescence apices using epi-illumination microscopy and commercially available EDF software. We then performed RNA in situ hybridizations on photographed apices to assess the expression of two developmental genes: Knotted1 (Kn1) in Zea mays (Poaceae) and a PISTILLATA (PI) homolog in Musa basjoo (Musaceae). We demonstrate that expression signal is neither altered nor reduced in the imaged apices as compared with the unphotographed controls. The demonstrated method reduces the amount of sample material necessary for developmental research, and enables individual floral development to be placed in the context of the entire inflorescence. While the technique presented here is particularly relevant to floral developmental biology, it is applicable to any research where observation and description of external features can be fruitfully linked with analyses of gene expression.


Epi-illumination microscopy In situ hybridization Non-model species Developmental evolution Floral development 


  1. Bateman RM, Rudall PJ (2006) Evolutionary and morphometric implications of morphological variation among flowers within an inflorescence: a case-study using European orchids. Ann Bot 98:975–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blancaflor EB, Gilroy S (2000) Plant cell biology in the new millennium: new tools and new insights. Am J Bot 87:1547–1560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charlton WA, Macdonald AD, Posluszny U, Wilkins CP (1989) Additions to the technique of epi-illumination light-microscopy for the study of floral and vegetative apices. Can J Bot 67:1739–1743Google Scholar
  4. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM (1991) The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jackson D (1991) In-situ hybridization in plants. In: Gurr SJ, McPherson MJ, Bowles DJ (eds) Molecular plant pathology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–174Google Scholar
  6. Jackson D, Veit B, Hake S (1994) Expression of maize KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development 120:405–413Google Scholar
  7. Kim M, McCormick S, Timmermans M, Sinha N (2003) The expression domain of PHANTASTICA determines leaflet placement in compound leaves. Nature 424:438–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirchoff BK (1988) Inflorescence and flower development in Costus scaber (Costaceae). Can J Bot 66:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kirchoff BK (2003) Shape matters: Hofmeister’s rule, primordium shape, and flower orientation. Int J Plant Sci 164:505–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kramer EM (2005) Methods for studying the evolution of plant reproductive structures: comparative gene expression techniques. Meth Enzymol 395B:617–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lacroix CR, Macintyre J (1995) New techniques and applications for epi-illumination light-microscopy. Can J Bot 73:1842–1847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lemon GD, Posluszny U (1998) A new approach to the study of apical meristem development using laser scanning confocal microscopy. Can J Bot 76:899–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leroy DO, Crane MJ (1964) The Ultropak, an aid in photomicrography. Micropaleontology 10:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Locquin M, Langeron M (1983) Handbook of microscopy. Butterworths, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Nickolls L (1937) Physics and the detection of crime. J Sci Instrum XIV:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nikon (2006) NIS Elements D user’s guide. Nikon, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Posluszny U, Scott MG, Sattler R (1980) Revisions in the technique of epi-illumination light-microscopy for the study of floral and vegetative apices. Can J Bot 58:2491–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sattler R (1968) A technique for the study of floral development. Can J Bot 46:720–722Google Scholar
  19. Schichnes D, Nemson J, Sohlberg L, Ruzin SE (1998) Microwave protocols for paraffin microtechnique and in situ localization in plants. Microsc Microanal 4:491–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tanaka M (2006) Dermoscopy. J Dermatol 33:513–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilson TC, Charlton WA, Posluszny U (2006) Increased image depth for epi-illumination microscopy. Can J Bot 84:508–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madelaine E. Bartlett
    • 1
  • Bruce K. Kirchoff
    • 2
  • Chelsea D. Specht
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant and Microbial BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations