Skip to main content
Log in

A new strategy for efficient in vivo screening of mutagenized Drosophila embryos

  • Technical notes
  • Published:
Development Genes and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analysis of mutants is an indispensable approach towards characterizing gene function. Combining several tools of Drosophila genetics, we designed a new strategy for a mutagenesis screen which is fast, easy-to-apply, and cheap. The combination of a cell-specific Gal4 line with an upstream activating sequence-green fluorescent protein (UAS-GFP) allows the in vivo detection of the cells or tissues of interest without the need for fixation and staining. To further simplify and accelerate the screening procedure, we generated recombinant flies that carry the Gal80 transgene in balancer chromosomes. Gal80 inactivates Gal4; and thus prevents GFP-expression during embryonic and postembryonic development in all individuals carrying the balancer chromosomes. This allows for an easy distinction in vivo between heterozygous and homozygous mutants, the latter being the only ones expressing GFP. Since most of the fly strains and balancer chromosomes can be substituted, this method is suitable for nearly any mutagenesis screen that does not have major restrictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barolo S, Carver LA, Posakony JW (2000) GFP and beta-galactosidase transformation vectors for promoter/enhancer analysis in Drosophila. Biotechniques 29:726, 728, 730, 732

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellen HJ, O’Kane CJ, Wilson C, Grossniklaus U, Pearson RK, Gehring WJ (1989) P-element-mediated enhancer detection: a versatile method to study development in Drosophila. Genes Dev 3:1288–1300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118:401–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Ortega JA (1995) Genetic mechanisms of early neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Neurobiol 10:75–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doe CQ (1992) Molecular markers for identified neuroblasts and ganglion mother cells in the Drosophila central nervous system. Development 116:855–863

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grigliatti T (1986) Mutagenesis. In: Roberts DB (Ed) Drosophila: a practical approach. IRL, Oxford, Washington DC, pp39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Schimmelpfeng K, Klämbt C (1997) Fast and efficient egg collection and antibody staining from large numbers of Drosophila strains. Dev Genes Evol 207:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito K, Urban J, Technau GM (1995) Distribution, classification, and development of Drosophila glial cells in the late embryonic and early larval ventral nerve cord. Roux´s Arch Dev Biol 204:284–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell MG (1986). P-M mutagenesis. In: Roberts DB (Ed) Drosophila: a practical approach. IRL, Oxford, Washington DC, pp59–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Luo L (1999) Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron 22:451–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E (1980) Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287:795–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell KH, Chen CT, Wensink PC (1994) Insulating DNA directs ubiquitous transcription of the Drosophila melanogaster alpha 1-tubulin gene. Mol Cell Biol 14:6398–6408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Kane CJ, Gehring WJ (1987) Detection in situ of genomic regulatory elements in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:9123–9127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson HM, Preston CR, Phillis RW, Johnson-Schlitz DM, Benz WK, Engels WR (1988) A stable genomic source of P element transposase in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 118:461–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki DT, Procunier D (1969) Temperature-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. 3. Dominant lethals and semilethals on chromosome 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 62:369–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urbach R, Technau GM (2003) Molecular markers for identified neuroblasts in the developing brain of Drosophila. Development 130:3621–3637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Erika Jost for her help in fly work, Ruth Beckervordersandforth and Rolf Urbach for their help in preparing the figures, and the Bloomington stock center for providing the fly strains. This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to B.A. and G.M.T.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerhard M. Technau.

Additional information

Communicated by P. Simpson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vef, O., Cleppien, D., Löffler, T. et al. A new strategy for efficient in vivo screening of mutagenized Drosophila embryos. Dev Genes Evol 216, 105–108 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-005-0036-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-005-0036-5

Keywords

Navigation