Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex related differences in the perception and production of emotional prosody in adults

  • Research
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the features of sex-related emotional prosody production patterns and perception abilities in adult speakers. The study involved 42 native Turkish speakers (27 females and 15 males). Sex-related perception and production of the emotions “anger,” “joy,” “sadness,” and “neutral” were examined. Participants were first asked to indicate the actor's emotional state by selecting one of the given emotion alternatives provided. They were then instructed to produce the same stimuli with varying emotions. We analyzed the change in voice characteristics employed in different emotions in terms of F0 (Hz), speaking rate (seconds), and intensity (dB) using pairwise emotion comparison. The findings showed no sex differences in emotional prosody perceptions (p = 0.725). However, differences in the production of emotional prosody between sex have been documented in pitch variation of speech. Within-group analyses revealed that women tended to use a higher pitch when expressing joy versus sadness and a neutral state of feeling. Both men and women exhibited varying loudness levels for different emotional states in the speech loudness analysis. When expressing sadness, both men and women speak slower than when expressing as contrasted to anger, joy, or neutral states of feeling. Although Turkish speakers’ ability to perceive emotional prosody is similar to that of other languages, they favor speech loudness fluctuation in the production of emotional prosody.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, AE, upon reasonable request.

References

  • Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Tranel, D. (2002). Neural systems for recognition of emotional prosody: A 3-D lesion study. Emotion, 2(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.1.23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akagi, M., Han, X., Elbarougy, R., Hamada, Y., & Li, J. (2014). Toward affective speech-to-speech translation: Strategy for emotional speech recognition and synthesis in multiple languages. In Signal and information processing association annual summit and conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific.

  • Association, T. L. (2015). Current Turkish dictionary www.tdk.gov.tr Accessed 02 June 2015.

  • Bachorowski, J., & Owren, M. J. (1995). Vocal expression of emotion: Acoustic properties of speech are associated with emotional intensity and context. Psychological Science, 6(4), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00596.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 614. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bänziger, T., & Scherer, K. R. (2005). The role of intonation in emotional expressions. Speech Communication, 46(3–4), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaucousin, V., Zago, L., Herve, P. Y., Strelnikov, K., Crivello, F., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2011). Sex-dependent modulation of activity in the neural networks engaged during emotional speech comprehension. Brain Research, 1390, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.03.043

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belin, P., Fillion-Bilodeau, S., & Gosselin, F. (2008). The Montreal affective voices: A validated set of nonverbal affect bursts for research on auditory affective processing. Behavior Research Methods, 40(2), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.2.531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belyk, M., & Brown, S. (2014). The acoustic correlates of valence depend on emotion family. Journal of Voice, 28(4), 523 e529-523 e518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besson, M., Magne, C., & Schon, D. (2002). Emotional prosody: Sex differences in sensitivity to speech melody. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(10), 405–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01975-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, S. L., & Lima, C. F. (2010). Recognizing emotions in spoken language: A validated set of Portuguese sentences and pseudosentences for research on emotional prosody. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, T. M. (2015). Gender and emotion expression: A developmental contextual perspective. Emotion Review, 7(1), 14–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, F., Saint-Amour, D., Lepore, F., & Lassonde, M. (2010). Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Filipe, M. G., Branco, P., Frota, S., Castro, S. L., & Vicente, S. G. (2015). Affective prosody in European Portuguese: Perceptual and acoustic characterization of one-word utterances. Speech Communication, 67, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2014.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, M., Sheahan, N., & Staunton, H. (2001). Gender and the integration of acoustic dimensions of prosody: Implications for clinical studies. Brain and Language, 78(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, J., Papaioannou, I., & Lemon, O. (2018). Spoken conversational ai in video games: Emotional dialogue management increases user engagement. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on intelligent virtual agents.

  • Giles, H., Scherer, K. R., & Taylor, D. M. (1979). Speech markers in social interaction. Social Markers in Speech, 343–381.

  • Heijnen, S., De Kleijn, R., & Hommel, B. (2019). The impact of human–robot synchronization on anthropomorphization. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2607.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hellbernd, N., & Sammler, D. (2016). Prosody conveys speaker’s intentions: Acoustic cues for speech act perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iriondo, I., Guaus, R., Rodríguez, A., Lázaro, P., Montoya, N., Blanco, J. M., Bernadas, D., Oliver, J. M., Tena, D., & Longhi, L. (2000). Validation of an acoustical modelling of emotional expression in Spanish using speech synthesis techniques. In ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Speech and Emotion.

  • Lambrecht, L., Kreifelts, B., & Wildgruber, D. (2013). Gender differences in emotion recognition: Impact of sensory modality and emotional category. Cognition and Emotion, 28(3), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.837378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laukka, P., Juslin, P., & Bresin, R. (2005). A dimensional approach to vocal expression of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 19(5), 633–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y., Ding, H., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Gender differences in identifying facial, prosodic, and semantic emotions show category-and channel-specific effects mediated by encoder’s gender. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(8), 2941–2955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lucarini, V., Grice, M., Cangemi, F., Zimmermann, J. T., Marchesi, C., Vogeley, K., & Tonna, M. (2020). Speech prosody as a bridge between psychopathology and linguistics: The case of the schizophrenia spectrum. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 531863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meral, H. M., Ekenel, H. K., & Özsoy, A. S. (2003). Analysis of emotion in Turkish [in Turkish: Türkçede Duygu Çözümlemesi]. www.linguistics.boun.edu.tr/bildiri.pdf

  • Montaño, R., Alías, F., & Ferrer, J. (2013). Prosodic analysis of storytelling discourse modes and narrative situations oriented to text-to-speech synthesis. In Eighth ISCA workshop on speech synthesis.

  • Morris, C. G. (2002). Understanding Psychology [in Turkish: Psikolojiyi Anlamak] (3rd ed.). Psychology Association Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulmann, S., & Uskul, A. K. (2014). Cross-cultural emotional prosody recognition: Evidence from Chinese and British listeners. Cognition and Emotion, 28(2), 230–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, J. M. (1999). The acoustics of speech communication: Fundamentals, speech perception theory, and technology. Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preti, E., Suttora, C., & Richetin, J. (2016). Can you hear what i feel? A validated prosodic set of angry, happy, and neutral Italian pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 259–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, L. J., Borden, G. J., & Harris, K. S. (2003). Speech science primer: Physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech (4th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, E. D. (2000). Affective prosody and the aprosodias. Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, 2, 316–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(6), 2408–2412. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908239106

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R., Clark-Polner, E., & Mortillaro, M. (2011). In the eye of the beholder? Universality and cultural specificity in the expression and perception of emotion. International Journal of Psychology, 46(6), 401–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.626049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer, A., Kotz, S. A., & Friederichi, A. D. (2002). Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 14(2), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00108-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M., Routray, A., & Kabisatpathy, P. (2018). Databases, features and classifiers for speech emotion recognition: A review. International Journal of Speech Technology, 21(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-018-9491-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, H.-H., Huang, Y.-L., Chen, J.-T., Liang, K.-Y., Lin, C.-C., & Chen, S.-H. (2017). Facial and prosodic emotion recognition in social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 22(4), 331–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vekkot, S., & Gupta, D. (2019). Prosodic transformation in vocal emotion conversion for multi-lingual scenarios: A pilot study. International Journal of Speech Technology, 22, 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language & Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 905–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690961003589492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z. (2021). Chasing the unicorn? The feasibility of automatic assessment of interpreting fluency. In Testing and assessment of interpreting: Recent developments in China (pp. 143–158).

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Audiology, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey

    Ayşe Ertürk & Emre Gürses

  2. Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sıhhiye, Ankara, Turkey

    Maviş Emel Kulak Kayıkcı

Authors
  1. Ayşe Ertürk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emre Gürses
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maviş Emel Kulak Kayıkcı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AE (corresponding author) study design, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. EG manuscript writing and editing. MEKK editing and supervision. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayşe Ertürk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Financial interests

The authors declare they have no financial interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ertürk, A., Gürses, E. & Kulak Kayıkcı, M.E. Sex related differences in the perception and production of emotional prosody in adults. Psychological Research 88, 449–457 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01865-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01865-1

Search

Navigation