In the present article, we examine a novel illusion of motion—the Z-Box illusion—in which the presence of a bounding object influences the perception of motion of an ambiguous stimulus that appears within. Specifically, the stimuli are a structure-from-motion (SFM) particle orb and a wireframe cube. The orb could be perceived as rotating clockwise or counterclockwise while the cube could only be perceived as moving in one direction. Both stimuli were presented on a two-dimensional (2D) display with inferred three-dimensional (3D) properties. In a single experiment, we examine motion perception of a particle orb, both in isolation and when it appears within a rotating cube. Participants indicated the orb’s direction of motion and whether the direction changed at any point during the trial. Accuracy was the critical measure while motion direction, the number of particles in the orb and presence of the wireframe cube were all manipulated. The results suggest that participants could perceive the orb’s true rotation in the absence of the cube so long as it was made up of at least ten particles. The presence of the cube dominated perception as participants consistently perceived congruent motion of the orb and cube, even when they moved in objectively different directions. These findings are considered as they relate to prior research on motion perception, computational modelling of motion perception, structure from motion and 3D object perception.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Experimental and data processing code are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Andersen, R. A., & Bradley, D. C. (1998). Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(6), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01181-4
Bradley, D. R., & Petry, H. M. (1977). Organizational determinants of subjective contour: The subjective necker cube. The American Journal of Psychology, 90(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422047 JSTOR.
Caudek, C., & Domini, F. (1998). Perceived orientation of axis rotation in structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 609.
Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2003). 3-D structure perceived from dynamic information: A new theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 444–449.
Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2010). Matching perceived depth from disparity and from velocity: Modeling and psychophysics. Acta Psychologica, 133(1), 81–89.
Domini, F., Vuong, Q. C., & Caudek, C. (2002). Temporal integration in structure from motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4), 816.
Erlikhman, G., Caplovitz, G. P., Gurariy, G., Medina, J., & Snow, J. C. (2018). Towards a unified perspective of object shape and motion processing in human dorsal cortex. Consciousness and Cognition, 64, 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.04.016
Erlikhman, G., Fu, M., Dodd, M. D., & Caplovitz, G. P. (2019). The motion-induced contour revisited: Observations on 3-D structure and illusory contour formation in moving stimuli. Journal of Vision, 19(1), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.1167/19.1.7
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Hoffman, D. D., & Bennett, B. M. (1986). The computation of structure from fixed-axis motion: Rigid structures. Biological Cybernetics, 54(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00320477
Jain, A., & Zaidi, Q. (2011). Discerning nonrigid 3D shapes from motion cues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(4), 1663–1668.
Köhler, W. (1970). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology (Vol. 18). WW Norton & Company.
Miles, W. R. (1931). Movement interpretations of the Silhouette of a Revolving Fan. The American Journal of Psychology, 43(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/1414610 JSTOR.
Nawrot, M., & Blake, R. (1989). Neural integration of information specifying structure from stereopsis and motion. Science, 244(4905), 716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2717948
Ramachandran, V. S., Cobb, S., & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (1988). Perception of 3-D structure from motion: The role of velocity gradients and segmentation boundaries. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(4), 390–393. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210423
Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8(2), 125–134.
Shipley, T. F., & Kellman, P. J. (1992). Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206762
Treue, S., Husain, M., & Andersen, R. A. (1991). Human perception of structure from motion. Vision Research, 31(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(91)90074-F
Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of structure from motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series b. Biological Sciences, 203(1153), 405–426.
Ullman, S. (1984). Maximizing rigidity: The incremental recovery of 3-D structure from rigid and Nonrigid motion. Perception, 13(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1068/p130255
Wallach, H., & O’Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(4), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056880
Weiss, Y., & Adelson, E. H. (1998). Slow and smooth: A Bayesian theory for the combination of local motion signals in human vision. Technical report A.I. Memo No. 1624, MIT.
Weiss, Y., & Adelson, E. H. (2000). Adventures with gelatinous ellipses—constraints on models of human motion analysis. Perception, 29(5), 543–566.
Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E. P., & Adelson, E. H. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience, 5(6), 598–604.
Wuerger, S., Shapley, R., & Rubin, N. (1996). “On the visually perceived direction of motion” by Hans Wallach: 60 years later. Perception, 25(11), 1317–1367. https://doi.org/10.1068/p251317
Yu, D., Levinthal, B., & Franconeri, S. L. (2017). Feature-based attention resolves depth ambiguity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(3), 804–809. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1155-x
This project was supported by National Science Foundation OIA 1632849 to MDD and colleagues. The authors would like to thank our research assistant Joshua Warren, who provided invaluable assistance in data collection and presentation of findings.
This project was supported by NSF OIA 1632849 (RII Track-2 FEC: Neural networks underlying the integration of knowledge and perception) to MDD and colleagues.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
The approval was obtained from the ethics committee of University of Nebraska – Lincoln. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
Participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their anonymous data.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Zosky, J.E., Dodd, M.D. The Z-Box illusion: dominance of motion perception among multiple 3D objects. Psychological Research (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01589-0