Abstract
Previous studies have shown that money possesses affective properties even when it is not at stake within a given task. Smaller economic values are generally perceived as less arousing and neutral in valence, whereas larger ones are perceived as more arousing and positive in valence. Moreover, numerical cognitive processes seem to be less prominent than affective ones in the way we perceive economic values. To shed light on the basic affective components of monetary values, we ran three experiments on the perception of banknotes to test (i) whether banknotes with different values (5€ and 100€) trigger different emotional states, (ii) if values are horizontally mapped based on their valence, rather than on their numerical magnitude, and (iii) whether the lateralized sight (in the left or right visual field) of a positive (higher) monetary value interferes with the classification of a negative stimulus. Results showed a coherent pattern that corroborates the idea that money is indeed an affective stimulus, even when it is not at stake within the task. A higher monetary value was shown (i) to have intrinsic rewarding properties that influence the evaluation of a subsequent target, (ii) to be mentally mapped on the right side, which is related to positive approaching of affective stimuli in right-handers, and (iii) to be in conflict with negative-withdrawing targets, but only when the values were presented on the right-positive side of respondents. Results are discussed considering existing theories of the psychological value of money, highlighting the hedonic characteristics of this special affective stimulus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, J. C., & Noma, E. J. (1978). Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. Hoboken: Wiley.
Bassel, C., & Schiff, B. B. (2001). Unilateral vibrotactile stimulation induces emotional biases in cognition and performance. Neuropsychologia, 39, 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00116-0.
Berkman, E. T., & Lieberman, M. D. (2010). Approaching the bad and avoiding the good: Lateral prefrontal cortical asymmetry distinguishes between action and valence. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 22(9), 1970–1979. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21317.
Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2010). Instrumental tool or drug: Relationship between attitudes to money and problem gambling. Addiction Research & Theory, 18(6), 681–691. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066351003786752.
Bourne, V. J. (2006). The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations. Laterality, 11(4), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500600633982.
Brookshire, G., & Casasanto, D. (2012). Motivation and motor control: hemispheric specialization for approach motivation reverses with handedness. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036036.
Brookshire, G., & Casasanto, D. (2018). Approach motivation in human cerebral cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170141. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0141.
Cai, F., Shen, H., & Hui, M. K. (2012). The effect of location on price estimation: Understanding number-location and number-order associations. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 718–724. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0203.
Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right-and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015854.
Chang, S., & Cho, Y. S. (2015). Polarity correspondence effect between loudness and lateralized response set. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 683. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00683.
Dalmaso, M., & Vicovaro, M. (2019). Evidence of SQUARC and distance effects in a weight comparison task. Cognitive Processing, 20, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00905-2.
Davidson, R. J. (2004). What does the prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: Perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research. Biological Psychology, 67, 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.008.
Davidson, R. J., Ekman, P., Saron, C. D., Senulis, J. A., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: Emotional expression and brain physiology: I. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.330.
Dehaene, S. (2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00055-X.
Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: how mind creates mathematics. Cambridge: OUP.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 122, 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371.
Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach–avoidance motivation. Motivation & Emotion, 30, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7.
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218.
Fazio, R. H. (2001). On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview. Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930125908.
Flexas, A., Rosselló, J., Christensen, J. F., Nadal, M., Olivera La Rosa, A., & Munar, E. (2013). Affective priming using facial expressions modulates liking for abstract art. PLoS ONE, 8, e80154. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080154.
Foroni, F., Pergola, G., Argiris, G., & Rumiati, R. I. (2013). The FoodCast research image database (FRIDa). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00051.
Freud, E., Culham, J. C., Namdar, G., & Behrmann, M. (2019). Object complexity modulates the association between action and perception in childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 179, 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.004.
Giuliani, F., D’Anselmo, A., Tommasi, L., Brancucci, A., & Pietroni, D. (2017). Hemispheric asymmetries in price estimation: Do brain hemispheres attribute different monetary values? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2042. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02042.
Giuliani, F., Manippa, V., Brancucci, A., Tommasi, L., & Pietroni, D. (2018). Side biases in euro banknotes recognition: The horizontal mapping of monetary value. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02293.
Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390.
John, J. M. M., Van Lishout, F., Gusareva, E. S., & Van Steen, K. (2013). A robustness study of parametric and non-parametric tests in model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction for epistasis detection. BioData Mining, 6(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-6-9.
Lamote, S., Hermans, D., Baeyens, F., & Eelen, P. (2004). An exploration of affective priming as an indirect measure of food attitudes. Appetite, 42(3), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2003.11.009.
Lea, S. E., & Webley, P. (2006). Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(2), 161–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009046.
Loftus, A. M., Nicholls, M. E., Mattingley, J. B., Chapman, H. L., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2009). Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(5), 925–945.
Lostutter, T. W., Enkema, M., Schwebel, F., Cronce, J. M., Garberson, L. A., Ou, B., & Larimer, M. E. (2019). Doing it for the money: The relationship between gambling and money attitudes among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 35(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-018-9789-4.
Lozano, D. I., Crites, S. L., Jr., & Aikman, S. N. (1999). Changes in food attitudes as a function of hunger. Appetite, 32, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1998.0205.
Mallik, A., Chanda, M. L., & Levitin, D. J. (2017). Anhedonia to music and mu-opioids: Evidence from the administration of naltrexone. Scientific Reports, 7, 41952. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41952.
Manippa, V., Giuliani, F., Brancucci, A., Tommasi, L., Palumbo, R., & Pietroni, D. (2019). Affective perception of Euro banknotes: Cognitive factors and interindividual differences. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01240-z.
Manippa, V., Padulo, C., & Brancucci, A. (2018). Emotional faces influence evaluation of natural and transformed food. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 82(4), 675–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0857-7.
Miller, A., & Tomarken, A. J. (2001). Task-dependent changes in frontal brain asymmetry: Effects of incentive cues, outcome expectancies, and motor responses. Psychophysiology, 38, 500–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3830500.
Mintz, S. W. (1986). Sweetness and power: The place of sugar in modern history. London: Penguin.
Najt, P., Bayer, U., & Hausmann, M. (2013). Models of hemispheric specialization in facial emotion perception—A reevaluation. Emotion, 13, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029723.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
Plassmann, H., O’Doherty, J., Shiv, B., & Rangel, A. (2008). Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. Proceedings of the National Academy of SCIENCES of the United States of America, 105, 1050–1054. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706929105.
Ren, P., Nicholls, M. E., Ma, Y. Y., & Chen, L. (2011). Size matters: Non-numerical magnitude affects the spatial coding of response. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23553.
Rozin, P., & Vollmecke, T. A. (1986). Food likes and dislikes. Annual Review of Nutrition, 6(1), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.06.070186.002245.
Sellaro, R., Treccani, B., Job, R., & Cubelli, R. (2015). Spatial coding of object typical size: Evidence for a SNARC-like effect. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79(6), 950–962.
Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2018). Language, Culture, and Space: Reconstructing Spatial-Numerical Associations. In Language and culture in mathematical cognition (pp. 257–274). Cambridge: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812574-8.00011-0
Shaki, S., Petrusic, W. M., & Leth-Steensen, C. (2012). SNARC effects with numerical and non-numerical symbolic comparative judgments: instructional and cultural dependencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026729.
Slater, P. E. (1980). Wealth addiction. New York: Dutton Adult.
Sobotka, S. S., Davidson, R. J., & Senulis, J. A. (1992). Anterior brain electrical asymmetries in response to reward and punishment. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 83, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(92)90117-Z.
Valenzuela, A., & Raghubir, P. (2009). Position-based beliefs: The centerstage effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.02.011.
Wedding, D., & Stalans, L. (1985). Hemispheric differences in the perception of positive and negative faces. International Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 277–281. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207458509149773.
Funding
This study did not receive any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VM and FG conceived and designed the experiment, collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data. FG wrote the manuscript. VM, AB, LT, RP, and DP provided critical revisions and contributed to the final version of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version for submission and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giuliani, F., Manippa, V., Brancucci, A. et al. How emotional is a banknote? The affective basis of money perception. Psychological Research 85, 3010–3025 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01457-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01457-3