Abstract
The effect of body-based information on spatial memory has been traditionally described as a facilitating factor for large-scale spatial learning in the field of active learning research (Chrastil & Warren, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(1):1–23; 2012). The specific contribution of body-based information to spatial representation properties is however not yet well defined and the mechanisms through which body-based information contributes to spatial learning are not clear enough. To disambiguate the effect of active spatial learning on the quality of spatial representations from the beneficial effect of physiological arousal, we compared four experimental conditions (walking on a unidirectional treadmill during learning, retrieval, both phases or no walking). Results showed no effect of the walking condition for a route perspective task, but a significant effect on a survey perspective task (landmark positioning on a map): participants who walked during encoding (encoding group and encoding + retrieval group) obtained better results than those who did not walk or walked only during retrieval. Geometrical analysis of spatial positions on maps revealed that the activity of walking during encoding improves the correlation between participants’ coordinates and actual coordinates through better distance estimations and angular accuracy, even though the optic flow was not matched with individual walking speed. Control group variance in all measures was higher than that of the walking groups (regardless of the moment of walking). Taken together, these results provide arguments for the multimodal nature of spatial representations, where body-related information derived from walking is involved in metric properties accuracy and perspective switching.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afonso, A., Blum, A., Katz, B. F. G., Tarroux, P. E., Borst, G., & Denis, M. (2010). Structural properties of spatial representations in blind people: Scanning images constructed from haptic exploration or from locomotion in a 3-D audio virtual environment. Memory and Cognition, 38(5), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.5.591.
Avraamides, M. N., Galati, A., Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., & Denis, M. (2013). Encoding and updating spatial information presented in narra- tives. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 642–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.712147.
Avraamides, M. N., Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., & Golledge, R. G. (2004). Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: Evidence from allocentric judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 30(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.804.
Baggett, P. (1984). Role of temporal overlap of visual and auditory material in forming dual media associations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 408–418.
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. ArXiv E-Print. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Bollen, K. A., & Jackman, R. W. (1990). Regression diagnostics: An expository treatment of outliers and influential cases. In J. Fox & J. S. Long (Eds.), Modern methods of data analysis (pp. 257–291). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. (2010). Moving through imagined space: Mentally simulating locomotion during spatial description reading. Acta Psychologica, 134(1), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.01.003.
Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: the contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence, 7(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565659.
Chrastil, E. R., & Warren, W. H. (2012). Active and passive contributions to spatial learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0182-x.
Chrastil, E. R., & Warren, W. H. (2013). Active and passive spatial learning in human navigation: acquisition of survey knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1520–1537. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032382.
Christou, C. G., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1999). View dependance in scene recognition after active learning. Memory and Cognition, 27(6), 996–1007. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201230.
Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22(1), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1981.tb00402.x.
Cook, D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and Influence in Regression. In D. R. Cox & D. V. Hinkley (Eds.), Monographs on statistics and applied probability (pp. 1–230). London: Chapman and Hall.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X.
Denis, M. (2018). Space and spatial cognition: a multidisciplinary perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315103808.
R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Dinoff, A., Herrmann, N., Swardfager, W., & Lanctôt, K. L. (2017). The effect of acute exercise on blood concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in healthy adults: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Neuroscience, 46(1), 1635–1646. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13603.
Farrell, M. J., Arnold, P., Pettifer, S., Adams, J., Graham, T., & MacManamon, M. (2003). Transfer of route learning from virtual to real environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 219–227.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching Imagined Environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.1.63.
Galati, G., Lobel, E., Vallar, G., Berthoz, A., Pizzamiglio, L., & Bihan, D. L. (2000). The neural basis of egocentric and allocentric coding of space in humans: A functional magnetic resonance study. Experimental Brain Research, 133(2), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210000375.
Gardony, A. L., Taylor, H. A., & Brunyé, T. T. (2016). Gardony Map Drawing Analyzer: Software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0556-x.
Gärling, T., & Golledge, R. G. (1989). Environmental perception and cognition. In E. H. Zube & G. T. Moore (Eds.), Advances in environment, behavior and design (pp. 203–236). Berlin: Springer. (doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0717-4_7).
Gaunet, F., Vidal, M., Kemeny, A., & Berthoz, A. (2001). Active, passive and snapshot exploration in a virtual environment: Influence on scene memory, reorientation and path memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(3), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00013-1.
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805844).
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Grant, S. C., & Magee, L. E. (1998). Contributions of proprioception to navigation in virtual environments. Human Factors, 40(3), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779591296.
Hazen, N. L. (1982). Spatial exploration and spatial knowledge : individual and developmental differences in very young children. Child Development, 53(3), 826–833.
Hommel, B. (2017). Goal-directed actions. In R. Waldmann (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning (pp. 265–288). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.18).
Hatzipanayioti, A., Galati, A., Avraamides, M. (2014). Spatial Updating in Narratives. In: Freksa, C., Nebel, B., Hegarty, M., Barkowsky, T. (eds) Spatial Cognition IX. Spatial Cognition 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_1.
Iglói, K., Zaoui, M., Berthoz, A., & Rondi-Reig, L. (2009). Sequential egocentric strategy is acquired as early as allocentric strategy: Parallel acquisition of these two navigation strategies. Hippocampus, 19(12), 1199–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20595.
Jeannerod, M. (1999). The 25th Bartlett Lecture: To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755803.
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832.
Kearns, M. J., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A. P., & Tarr, M. J. (2002). Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception, 31(3), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3311.
Kelly, J. W., Avraamides, M. N., & Loomis, J. M. (2007). Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 33(6), 1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1092.
Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freska, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition (pp. 1–17). New York: Springer. (doi: 10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1).
König, S. U., Goeke, C., Meilinger, T., & König, P. (2019). Are allocentric spatial reference frames compatible with theories of Enactivism? Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 83(3), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0899-x.
Kunz, B. R., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Thompson, W. B. (2009). Evidence for Motor Simulation in Imagined Locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015786.
Lappe, M., & Frenz, H. (2009). Visual estimation of travel distance during walking. Experimental Brain Research, 199(3–4), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1890-6.
Lhuillier, S., Gyselinck, V., Dutriaux, L., Grison, E., & Nicolas, S. (2018). “Like a ball and chain”: Altering locomotion effort perception distorts spatial representations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 60(August), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.10.008.
Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., Golledge, R. G., Cicinelli, J. G., Pellegrino, J. W., & Fry, P. A. (1993). Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: Assessment of path integration ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.122.1.73.
Madan, C. R., & Singhal, A. (2012). Using actions to enhance memory: Effects of enactment, gestures, and exercise on human memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 2010–2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00507.
Maddock, R. J., Casazza, G. A., Fernandez, D. H., & Maddock, M. I. (2016). Acute Modulation of Cortical Glutamate and GABA Content by Physical Activity. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36(8), 2449–2457. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3455-15.2016.
May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: Transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 163–206.
Mittelstaedt, M.-L., & Mittelstaedt, H. (2001). Idiothetic navigation in humans: estimation of path length. Experimental Brain Research, 139(3), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210100735.
Montello, D. R. (1997). The perception and cognition of environmental distance: Direct sources of information. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1329, 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63623-4_57. (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics).
Montello, D. R. (2009). A conceptual model of the cognitive processing of environmental distance information. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5756 LNCS, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7_1
Papaxanthis, C., Pozzo, T., Skoura, X., & Schieppati, M. (2002). Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task. Behavioural Brain Research, 134(1–2), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00030-X.
Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2000). Differenze individuali nella rappresentazione dello spazio: presentazione di un questionario autovalutativo [Individual differences in spatial representation and in orientation ability: presentation of a self-report questionnaire]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 27(3), 627–650.
Pazzaglia, F., & Meneghetti, C. (2017). Acquiring spatial knowledge from different sources and perspectives: abilities, strategies and representations. In J. Zacks & H. A. Taylor (Eds.), Representations in Mind and World Essays inspired by Barbara Tversky (pp. 120–134). Abingdon: Routledge. (10.4324/9781315169781-9).
Péruch, P., Vercher, J. L., & Gauthier, G. M. (1995). Acquisition of spatial knowledge through visual exploration of simulated environments. Ecological Psychology, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0701_1.
Poincaré, H. (1914). Science et méthode. Ernest Flammarion.
Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00008.x.
Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., & Epstein, W. (2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science, 24(3), 419–430.
Riecke, B. E., Cunningham, D. W., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2007). Spatial updating in virtual reality: The sufficiency of visual information. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 71(3), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0085-z.
Riecke, B. E., van Veen, H. A. H. C., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2002). Landmarks: A path integration study in virtual reality. Presence, 11(5), 443–473. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474602320935810.
Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1157–1165.
Rieser, J. J., Guth, D. A., & Hill, E. W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception, 15(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1068/p150173.
Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Ashmead, D. H., & Garing, A. E. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.480.
Ruddle, R. A., & Lessels, S. (2009). The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/1502800.1502805.
Ruddle, R. A., & Péruch, P. (2004). Effects of proprioceptive feedback and environmental characteristics on spatial learning in virtual environments. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 60(3), 299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.10.001.
Ruddle, R. A., Volkova, E., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2011a). Walking improves your cognitive map in environments that are large-scale and large in extent. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/1970378.1970384.
Ruddle, R. A., Volkova, E., Mohler, B., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2011b). The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 39(4), 686–699. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0054-z.
Salas, C. R., Minakata, K., & Kelemen, W. L. (2011). Walking before study enhances free recall but not judgement-of-learning magnitude. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.532207.
Santoro, I., Murgia, M., Sors, F., & Agostini, T. (2017a). Walking reduces the gap between encoding and sensorimotor alignment effects in spatial updating of described environments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 750–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1157615.
Santoro, I., Murgia, M., Sors, F., & Agostini, T. (2019). The influence of the encoding modality on spatial navigation for sighted and late-blind people. Multisensory Research, 33(4–5), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-20191431.
Santoro, I., Murgia, M., Sors, F., Prpic, V., & Agostini, T. (2017b). Walking during the encoding of described environments enhances a heading-independent spatial representation. Acta Psychologica, 180, 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.002.
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(6), 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470057339.vai016.
Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 489–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.010.
Stevens, J. A. (2005). Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition, 95, 329–350.
Tcheang, L., Bülthoff, H. H., & Burgess, N. (2011). Visual influence on path integration in darkness indicates a multimodal representation of large-scale space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(3), 1152–1157. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011843108.
Tomporowski, P. D. (2003). Effects of acute bouts of exercise on cognition. Acta Psychologica, 112(3), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00134-8.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Tulving, E., Thomson, D. M., & Tulving, E. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020071.
Tversky, B. (1993). Cognitive maps, cognitive collages and spatial mental models. In A. U. Franck & I. Campari (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory : a theoretical basis for GIS, Proccedings COSIT ’93 (pp. 14–24). New York: Springer. (doi: 10.1007/3-540-57207-4_2).
Tversky, B. (2003). Structures of mental spaces: How people think about space. Environment and Behavior, 35(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238865.
van Rijn, H. (2014). It’s time to take the psychology of biological time into account: Speed of driving affects a trip’s subjective duration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01028.
Voss, J. L., Gonsalves, B. D., Federmeier, K. D., Tranel, D., & Cohen, N. J. (2011). Hippocampal brain-network coordination during volitional exploratory behavior enhances learning. Nature Neuroscience, 14(1), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.03.040.
Waller, D., & Greenauer, N. (2007). The role of body-based sensory information in the acquisition of enduring spatial representations. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 71(3), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0087-x.
Waller, D., Loomis, J. M., & Haun, D. B. M. (2004). Body-based senses enhance knowledge of directions in large-scale environments. Psychonomic Bullletin and Review, 11(1), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206476.
Weber, K. D., Fletcher, W. A., Gordon, C. R., Melvill Jones, G., & Block, E. W. (1998). Motor learning in the “podokinetic” system and its role in spatial orientation during locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 120(3), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050411.
White, E., Shockley, K., & Riley, M. A. (2013). Multimodally specified energy expenditure and action-based distance judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(6), 1371–1377. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0462-8.
Wilson, P. N. (1999). Active exploration of a virtual environment does not promote orientation or memory for objects. Environment and Behavior, 31(6), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972335.
Wilson, P. N., Foreman, N., Gillett, R., & Stanton, D. (1997). Active versus passive processing of spatial information in a computer-simulated environment. Ecological Psychology, 9(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0903.
Witt, J. K., & Riley, M. A. (2014). Discovering your inner Gibson: Reconciling action-specific and ecological approaches to perception–action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(6), 1353–1370. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0623-4.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the French National Research Agency (Grant ANR-13-APPR-0009 to Valérie Gyselinck). The experiment was run in Pascale Piolino's lab which provided financial support for the material. Simon Lhuillier designed the experiment, recruited subjects, acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. Valérie Gyselinck designed the experiment, substantially contributed to the interpretation of the data and critically revised the manuscript. Serge Nicolas designed the experiment, contributed to the interpretation of the data and revised the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Simon Lhuillier, Valérie Gyselinck, Pascale Piolino and Serge Nicolas declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lhuillier, S., Gyselinck, V., Piolino, P. et al. “Walk this way”: specific contributions of active walking to the encoding of metric properties during spatial learning. Psychological Research 85, 2502–2517 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01415-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01415-z