Abstract
There is still a need to analyze the factors that enhance navigation accuracy. This study aims to examine how success in environment learning relates to task goals and WM. A total of 90 undergraduates (46 females) learned a route from a virtual navigation experience after being given a goal that involved tracing the route (a route-based goal) or finding a shortcut (a survey-based goal). The two groups thus formed were each divided into three subgroups according to the dual-task paradigm: one only navigated (control condition); the other two did so while simultaneously performing a visuo-spatial or verbal secondary task. Afterwards, participants traced the previously seen route and found a shortcut. Several visuo-spatial and verbal WM tasks were also administered. The results showed that participants given a route-based goal performed better in the route-tracing task; and those given a survey-based goal were better at finding shortcuts. An influence of WM was also shown: higher WM (visuo-spatial and verbal) ability significantly reduced the number of route-tracing errors made while performing a secondary visuo-spatial task, regardless of the goal, whereas no such effects emerged for shortcut finding. These results offer new insight on how task goals and WM support successful navigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.
Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Working memory in developing and applying mental models from spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 701–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.003.
Cornoldi, C., & Mammarella, I. C. (2008). A comparison of backward and forward spatial spans. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701774200.
Corsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Montreal: McGill University.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
De Beni, R., Borella, E., Carretti, B., Marigo, C., & Nava, L. A. (2008). BAC. Portfolio per la valutazione del benessere e delle abilità cognitive nell’età adulta e avanzata [“The assessment of well-being and cognitive abilities in adulthood and aging”]. Firenze: Giunti OS.
Denis, M. (2018). Space and spatial cognition: A multidisciplinary perspective. New York: Routledge.
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160.
Foroughi, C. K., Werner, N. E., McKendrick, R., Cades, D. M., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2016). Individual differences in working-memory capacity and task resumption following interruptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1480–1488. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000251.
Garden, S., Cornoldi, C., & Logie, R. H. (2002). Visuo-spatial working memory in navigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.746.
Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Ambridge, B., & Wearing, H. (2004). The structure of working memory from 4 to 15 years of age. Developmental Psychology, 40, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.177.
Gyselinck, V., De Beni, R., Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., & Mondoloni, A. (2007). Working memory components and imagery instructions in the elaboration of a spatial mental model. Psychological Research, 71, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0091-1.
Gyselinck, V., Meneghetti, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2009). The role of working memory in spatial text processing: What benefit of imagery strategy and visuospatial abilities? Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.08.002.
Hegarty, M., Montello, R. D., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34, 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Intell.2005.09.005.
Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), Handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196323.
Labate, E., Pazzaglia, F., & Heharty, M. (2014). What working memory subcomponents are needed in the acquisition of survey knowledge? Evidence from direction estimation and shortcut tasks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.007.
Lawton, C. A. (2010). Gender, spatial abilities, and wayfinding. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology. New York: Springer Science.
Logie, R. H., & Marchetti, C. (1991). Visuo-spatial working memory: Visual, spatial or central executive? In R. H. Logie & M. Denis (Eds.), Mental images in human cognition (pp. 105–115). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Magliano, J. P., Cohen, R., Allen, G. L., & Rodrigue, J. R. (1995). The impact of a wayfinder’s goal on learning a new environment: Different types of spatial knowledge as goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90015-2.
Mammarella, I. C., Borella, E., Pastore, M., & Pazzaglia, F. (2013). The structure of visuospatial memory in adulthood. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.014.
Meilinger, T., Knauff, M., & Bulthoff, H. H. (2008). Working memory in wayfinding: A dual task experiment in a virtual city. Cognitive Science, 32, 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802067004.
Meneghetti, C., Borella, E., Carbone, E., Martinelli, M., & De Beni, R. (2016a). Environment learning using descriptions or navigation: The involvement of working memory in young and older adults. British Journal of Psychology, 107, 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12145.
Meneghetti, C., De Beni, R., Gyselinck, V., & Pazzaglia, F. (2011). Working memory involvement in spatial text processing: What advantages are gained from extended learning and visuo-spatial strategies? British Journal of Psychology, 102, 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02007.
Meneghetti, C., De Beni, R., Gyselinck, V., & Pazzaglia, F. (2013). The joint role of spatial ability and imagery strategy in sustaining the learning of spatial descriptions under spatial interference. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.021.
Meneghetti, C., Gyselinck, V., Pazzaglia, F., & De Beni, R. (2009). Individual differences in spatial text processing: High spatial ability can compensate for spatial working memory interference. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.07.007.
Meneghetti, C., Ronconi, L., Pazzaglia, F., & De Beni, R. (2014). Spatial mental representations derived from spatial descriptions: The predicting and mediating roles of spatial preferences, strategies, and abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12038.
Meneghetti, C., Zancada-Menéndez, C., Lopez, L., Sampedro-Piquero, P., Martinelli, M., Ronconi, L., & Rossi, B. (2016b). Mental representations derived from navigation: The role of visuo-spatial abilities and working memory. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.002.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.621.
Montello, D. R. (2005). Navigation. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 257–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Muffato, V., Meneghetti, C., & De Beni, R. (2016). Not all is lost in older adults’ route learning: The role of visuo-spatial abilities and type of task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.003.
Nori, N., Piccardi, L., Peolosi, A., De Luca, D., Frasca, F., & Giusberti, F. (2015). Perspective changing in WalCT and VR-WalCT: A gender difference study [WalCT–VR-WalCT: Gender differences]. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 316–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.015.
Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., De Beni, R., & Gyselinck, V. (2010). Working memory components in survey and route spatial texts processing. Cognitive Processing, 11, 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0353-0.
Pazzaglia, F., Meneghetti, C., & Ronconi, L. (2018). Tracing a route and finding a shortcut: The working memory, motivational, and personality factors involved. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00225.
Pazzaglia, F., & Taylor, H. A. (2007). Perspective, instruction, and cognitive style in spatial representation of a virtual environment. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 7, 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860701663223.
Picucci, L., Gyselinck, V., Piolino, P., Nicolas, S., & Bosco, A. (2013). Spatial mental models: The interaction of presentation format, task requirements and availability of working memory components. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2909.
Rossell, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
Schwering, A., Krukar, J., Li, R., Anacta, A. J., & Fuest, S. (2017). Wayfinding through orientation. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 17, 273–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2017.1322597.
Taylor, H. A., & Naylor, S. J. (2002). Goal-directed effects on processing a spatial environment. In K. R. Coventry & P. Olivier (Eds.), Spatial language. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taylor, H. A., Naylor, S. J., & Chechile, N. A. (1999). Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective. Memory & Cognition, 27, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211414.
Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90019-6.
Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626.
Vandierendonck, A. (2016). A working memory system with distributed executive control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 74–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615596790.
Wang, L., Cohen, A. S., & Carr, M. (2014). Spatial ability at two scales of representation: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.006.
Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS-R manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation (Italian Edition by O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali (Ed.), Firenze, 1997).
Weisberg, S. M., Schinazi, V. R., Newcombe, N. S., Shipley, T. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2014). Variations in cognitive maps: Understanding individual differences in navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035261.
Wen, W., Ishikawa, T., & Sato, T. (2011). Working memory in spatial knowledge acquisition: Differences in encoding processes and sense of direction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1737.
Wen, W., Ishikawa, T., & Sato, T. (2013). Individual differences in the encoding processes of egocentric and allocentric survey knowledge. Cognitive Science, 37, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12005.
Wen, W., Ishikawa, T., & Sato, T. (2014). Instruction of verbal and spatial strategies for learning about large-scale spaces. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.005.
Wiener, J. M., & Mallot, H. A. (2003). Fine-to-coarse route planning and navigation in regionalized environments. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 3, 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427633scc0304_5.
Wolbers, T., & Hegarty, M. (2010). What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001.
Acknowledgements
The present work was conducted as part of the Dipartimenti di Eccellenza research program (art.1, commi 314-337 legge 232/2016), supported by a Grant from MIUR to the Department of General Psychology, University of Padua.
Funding
This study is not supported by any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors of this paper have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the current study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national and institutional (University of Padua) research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meneghetti, C., Labate, E., Toffalini, E. et al. Successful navigation: the influence of task goals and working memory. Psychological Research 85, 634–648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01270-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01270-7