Age-related differentiation in verbal and visuospatial working memory processing in childhood
Working memory (WM), a key feature of the cognitive system, allows for maintaining and processing information simultaneously and in a controlled manner. WM processing continuously develops across childhood, with significant increases both in verbal and visuospatial WM. Verbal and visuospatial WM may show different developmental trajectories, as verbal (but not visuospatial) WM relies on internal verbal rehearsal, which is less developed in younger children. We examined complex VWM and VSWM performance in 125 younger (age 4–6 years) and 101 older (age 8–10 years) children. Latent multi-group modeling showed that (1) older children performed better on both verbal and visuospatial WM span tasks than younger children, (2) both age groups performed better on verbal than visuospatial WM, and (3) a model with two factors representing verbal and visuospatial WM fit the data better than a one-factor model. Importantly, the correlation between the two factors was significantly higher in younger than in older children, suggesting an age-related differentiation of verbal and spatial WM processing in middle childhood. Age-related differentiation is an important characteristic of cognitive functioning and thus the findings contribute to our general understanding of WM processing.
This work was supported by joint grants from the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC, ES/N018877/1) and the German Research Foundation (DFG, KA 3216/2-1). We thank A. Cloes, G. Schaarschmidt, M. Hansmann, R. Sperlich, A. Hall, J. Middleton, S. Ju, and C. Serrano for their help with testing, KoWo - Kommunale Wohnungsgesellschaft mbH Erfurt for providing a test room, and the children and their parents for their participation.
- Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Adams, A.-M., Willis, C., Eaglen, R., & Lamont, E. (2005). Working memory and phonological awareness as predictors of progress toward early learning goals at school entry. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X26804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hitch, G. J., Halliday, M. S., & Littler, J. E. (1993). Development of memory span for spoken words: The role of rehearsal and item identification processes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1993.tb00595.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jarrold, C., & Towse, J. N. (2006). Individual differences in working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jarvis, H. L., & Gathercole, S. E. (2003). Verbal and nonverbal working memory and achievements on national curriculum tests at 11 and 14 years of age. Educational and Child Psychology, 20, 123–140.Google Scholar
- Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working-memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34184.108.40.206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
- Studer-Luethi, B., Kodzhabashev, S., Hogrefe, A., & Perrig, W. J. (2015). BrainTwister2—An extended collection of cognitive training tasks. Fachstelle für Lernen und Gedächtnis: Universität Bern.Google Scholar
- Vallar, G., & Papagno, C. (2002). Neuropsychological impairments of verbal short-term memory. In M. Kopelman, A. D. Baddeley, & B. Wilson (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 249–270). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar