Skip to main content
Log in

Attribution of vision and knowledge in ‘spontaneous perspective taking’

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theory of mind is a ubiquitous notion that permeates many aspects of social cognition. A recent application has been in the context of ‘spontaneous perspective taking’ in which responses to target stimuli are facilitated if a human agent, present in a display, sees the same stimuli as an experimental participant. In the present work, we replicated results from a paradigm purporting to show such perspective taking in which participants tend to judge an ambiguous number from the position of an agent. We find, however (in Experiment 1) that this effect still occurs even when the agent cannot see the number due to an occluding object. This, therefore, does not support the perspective-taking hypothesis. An alternative explanation to the theory of mind account is posited in which the agent acts as a reference point that cues the observer to view the critical stimuli from that position and in the direction to which the agent faces. We test this hypothesis in Experiments 2 and 3, and show that non-human reference points can generate perspective-taking-like data. Overall, these results do not support the theory of mind account of previous studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, L. J., & Levin, D. T. (2015). The role of relational triggers in event perception. Cognition,136, 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind & Language,28(5), 378–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capozzi, F., Cavallo, A., Furlanetto, T., & Becchio, C. (2014). Altercentric intrusions from multiple perspectives: Beyond dyads. PLoS One,9(12), e114210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, G. G., Atkinson, M. A., D’Souza, A. D., & Smith, D. T. (2017). Spontaneous perspective taking in humans? Vision,1(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision1020017.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, G. G., Atkinson, M., Le, A., & Smith, D. (2016). Do humans spontaneously take the perspective of others? Acta Psychologica,164, 165–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, G. G., Smith, D., & Atkinson, M. (2015). Mental state attribution and the gaze cueing effect. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics,77, 1105–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schutz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2011). How “social” is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology,2, 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doneva, S. P., & Cole, G. G. (2014). The role of attention in a joint-action effect. PLoS One,9(3), e91336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., & Frith, U. (1995). Theory of Mind in autism. Learning and cognition in autism (pp. 177–197). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, G., Vacaityte, I., D’Souza, A., Millett, A., & Cole, G. G. (2018). Gaze following and mental state attribution. Cognition,180, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1985). Skill and spontaneousity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology,39, 367–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, H., & Kadipasaoglu, D. (2013). The primacy of social over visual perspective-taking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,7, 558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, E. J., Freeth, M., & Smith, D. T. (2018). Mental state attributions mediate the gaze cueing effect. Vision,2(1), 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuku, P., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Joint attention: Inferring what others perceive (and don’t perceive). Consciousness and Cognition,17(1), 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,36, 1255–1266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santiesteban, I., Catmur, C., Hopkins, S. C., Bird, G., & Heyes, C. (2014). Avatars and arrows: Implicit mentalizing or domain-general processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,40(3), 929.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Surtees, A. D. R., Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2012). Direct and indirect measures of Level-2 perspective-taking in children and adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,30, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surtees, A., Samson, D., & Apperly, I. (2016). Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen. Cognition,148, 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teufel, C., Alexis, D. M., Clayton, N. S., & Davis, G. (2010). Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,72(3), 695–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,14(8), 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., & Chua, R. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred’s action?: Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters,385(2), 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Cusimano, C., & Malle, B. F. (2015). In search of triggering conditions for spontaneous visual perspective taking. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 2811–2816). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff G. Cole.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be interpreted as influencing the research.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Millett, A.C., D’Souza, A.D.C. & Cole, G.G. Attribution of vision and knowledge in ‘spontaneous perspective taking’. Psychological Research 84, 1758–1765 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01179-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01179-1

Navigation