Abstract
Theory of mind is a ubiquitous notion that permeates many aspects of social cognition. A recent application has been in the context of ‘spontaneous perspective taking’ in which responses to target stimuli are facilitated if a human agent, present in a display, sees the same stimuli as an experimental participant. In the present work, we replicated results from a paradigm purporting to show such perspective taking in which participants tend to judge an ambiguous number from the position of an agent. We find, however (in Experiment 1) that this effect still occurs even when the agent cannot see the number due to an occluding object. This, therefore, does not support the perspective-taking hypothesis. An alternative explanation to the theory of mind account is posited in which the agent acts as a reference point that cues the observer to view the critical stimuli from that position and in the direction to which the agent faces. We test this hypothesis in Experiments 2 and 3, and show that non-human reference points can generate perspective-taking-like data. Overall, these results do not support the theory of mind account of previous studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, L. J., & Levin, D. T. (2015). The role of relational triggers in event perception. Cognition,136, 14–29.
Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2013). How to construct a minimal theory of mind. Mind & Language,28(5), 378–384.
Capozzi, F., Cavallo, A., Furlanetto, T., & Becchio, C. (2014). Altercentric intrusions from multiple perspectives: Beyond dyads. PLoS One,9(12), e114210.
Cole, G. G., Atkinson, M. A., D’Souza, A. D., & Smith, D. T. (2017). Spontaneous perspective taking in humans? Vision,1(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision1020017.
Cole, G. G., Atkinson, M., Le, A., & Smith, D. (2016). Do humans spontaneously take the perspective of others? Acta Psychologica,164, 165–168.
Cole, G. G., Smith, D., & Atkinson, M. (2015). Mental state attribution and the gaze cueing effect. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics,77, 1105–1115.
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schutz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2011). How “social” is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology,2, 84.
Doneva, S. P., & Cole, G. G. (2014). The role of attention in a joint-action effect. PLoS One,9(3), e91336.
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (1995). Theory of Mind in autism. Learning and cognition in autism (pp. 177–197). New York: Springer.
Kuhn, G., Vacaityte, I., D’Souza, A., Millett, A., & Cole, G. G. (2018). Gaze following and mental state attribution. Cognition,180, 1–9.
Logan, G. D. (1985). Skill and spontaneousity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology,39, 367–386.
Moll, H., & Kadipasaoglu, D. (2013). The primacy of social over visual perspective-taking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,7, 558.
Morgan, E. J., Freeth, M., & Smith, D. T. (2018). Mental state attributions mediate the gaze cueing effect. Vision,2(1), 11.
Nuku, P., & Bekkering, H. (2008). Joint attention: Inferring what others perceive (and don’t perceive). Consciousness and Cognition,17(1), 339–349.
Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J., & Bodley Scott, S. E. (2010). Seeing it their way: Evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,36, 1255–1266.
Santiesteban, I., Catmur, C., Hopkins, S. C., Bird, G., & Heyes, C. (2014). Avatars and arrows: Implicit mentalizing or domain-general processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,40(3), 929.
Surtees, A. D. R., Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. A. (2012). Direct and indirect measures of Level-2 perspective-taking in children and adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,30, 75–86.
Surtees, A., Samson, D., & Apperly, I. (2016). Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen. Cognition,148, 97–105.
Teufel, C., Alexis, D. M., Clayton, N. S., & Davis, G. (2010). Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,72(3), 695–705.
Waytz, A., Gray, K., Epley, N., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,14(8), 383–388.
Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., & Chua, R. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred’s action?: Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters,385(2), 99–104.
Zhao, X., Cusimano, C., & Malle, B. F. (2015). In search of triggering conditions for spontaneous visual perspective taking. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 2811–2816). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Funding
This research was not funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be interpreted as influencing the research.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Millett, A.C., D’Souza, A.D.C. & Cole, G.G. Attribution of vision and knowledge in ‘spontaneous perspective taking’. Psychological Research 84, 1758–1765 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01179-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01179-1