Abstract
Experiencing an environment by navigating in it or reading a map (route and survey views, respectively) is a typical activity of everyday life. Previous research has demonstrated that aging coincides with a decline in spatial learning, but it is unclear whether this depends to some degree on how the learning conditions relate to the method used to assess the recall. The present study aims to shed light on this issue. Forty-six young, 43 young-old and 38 old-old adults learned outdoor environments from a map and a video, then performed sketch map and route repetition tasks. Participants were assessed on their visuo-spatial working memory (VSWM), and reported their self-assessed visuo-spatial inclinations. The results showed that young adults completed the sketch maps more accurately after learning from a map rather than a video. The same was true of the young-old participants (but not of the old-old), though their performance was not as good as the younger group’s. The learning condition had no effect on the route repetition task, however, and only age-related differences emerged, with both older groups performing less well than the young adults. After controlling for learning condition and age group, VSWM and participants’ reported propensity to explore places predicted their accuracy in both types of spatial task. The overall results, discussed in the light of spatial cognitive and aging models, show that learning condition (combined with recall tasks) and visuo-spatial factors influence spatial representations, even in aging.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A participant could be assigned to one of the following four combinations: (i) map learning, sketch map task, route repetition task; then video learning, sketch map task, route repetition task; (ii) video learning, sketch map task, route repetition task; then map learning, sketch map task, route repetition task; (iii) map learning, route repetition task, sketch map task; then video learning, route repetition task, sketch map task; or (iv) video learning, route repetition task, sketch map task; then map learning, route repetition task, sketch map task.
References
Ardila, A. (2000). Age-related cognitive decline during normal aging: The complex effect of education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(99)00040-2.
Baltes, M. (1996). The psychology of the oldest-old: The fourth age. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 11, 411–415.
Barrash, J. (1994). Age-related decline in route learning ability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 10, 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649409540578.
Blades, M. (1990). The reliability of data collected from sketch maps. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80032-5.
Boccia, M., Guariglia, C., Sabatini, U., & Nemmi, F. (2016). Navigating toward a novel environment from a route or survey perspective: Neural correlates and context-dependent connectivity. Brain Structure and Function, 221, 2005–2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1021-z.
Borella, E., Meneghetti, C., Muffato, V., & De Beni, R. (2015). Map learning and the alignment effect in young and older adults: How do they gain from having a map available while performing pointing tasks? Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0543-y.
Borella, E., Meneghetti, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). Spatial abilities across the adult life span. Developmental Psychology, 50, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033818.
Colombo, D., Serino, S., Tuena, C., Pedroli, E., Dakanalis, A., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G. (2017). Egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frames in aging: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 80, 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.012.
Coluccia, E., Bosco, A., & Brandimonte, M. A. (2007). The role of visuo-spatial working memory in map learning: New findings from a map drawing paradigm. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 71, 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0090-2.
Coluccia, E., & Louse, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.006.
Crook, T., Bartus, R. T., Ferris, S. H., Whitehouse, P., Cohen, G. D., & Gershon, S. (1986). Age-associated memory impairment: Proposed diagnostic criteria and measures of clinical change—report of a National Institute of Mental Health work group. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2, 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565648609540348.
Cushman, L. A., Stein, K., & Duffy, C. J. (2008). Detecting navigational deficits in cognitive aging and Alzheimer disease using virtual reality. Neurology, 71, 888–895. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000326262.67613.fe.
De Beni, R., Borella, E., Carretti, B., Marigo, C., & Nava, L. A. (2008). Portfolio per la valutazione del benessere e delle abilità cognitive nell’età adulta e avanzata [The assessment of well-being and cognitive abilities in adulthood and aging]. Firenze: Giunti OS.
De Beni, R., Meneghetti, C., Fiore, F., Gava, L., & Borella, E. (2014). Batteria Visuo-spaziale. Strumenti per la valutazione delle abilità visuo-spaziali nell’arco di vita adulta [Visuo-spatial battery: Instrument for assessing visuo-spatial abilities across adult life span]. Firenze: Hogrefe.
Devlin, A. L., & Wilson, P. H. (2010). Adult age differences in the ability to mentally transform object and body stimuli. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17, 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2010.510554.
Galati, G., Pelle, G., Berthoz, A., & Committeri, G. (2010). Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory. Experimental Brain Research, 206, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2168-8.
Garden, S., Cornoldi, C., & Logie, R. H. (2002). Visuo-spatial working memory in navigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.746.
Gardony, A. L., Taylor, H. A., & Brunyé, T. T. (2016). Gardony Map Drawing Analyzer: Software for quantitative analysis of sketch maps. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 151–177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0556-x.
Gazova, I., Laczó, J., Rubinova, E., Mokrisova, I., Hyncicova, E., Andel, R., & Hort, J. (2013). Spatial navigation in young versus older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00094.
Grady, C. L., McIntosh, A. R., & Craik, F. I. M. (2003). Age-related differences in the functional connectivity of the hippocampus during memory encoding. Hippocampus, 13, 572–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.10114.
Harris, M. A., Wiener, J. M., & Wolbers, T. (2012). Aging specifically impairs switching to an allocentric navigational strategy. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2012.00029.
Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude test performance and spatial layout learning. Intelligence, 34, 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005.
Hund, A. M., & Padgitt, A. J. (2010). Direction giving and following in the service of wayfinding in a complex indoor environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.002.
Iglói, K., Zaoui, M., Berthoz, A., & Rondi-Reig, L. (2009). Sequential egocentric strategy is acquired as early as allocentric strategy: Parallel acquisition of these two navigation strategies. Hippocampus, 19, 1199–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20595.
ISTAT. (2011). Annuario statistico italiano 2011 (Italian Statistics Yearbook 2011). Rome: ISTAT.
Jansen, P., Schmelter, A., & Heil, M. (2010). Spatial knowledge acquisition in younger and elderly adults. Experimental Psychology, 57, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000007.
Kirasic, K. C. (2000). Age differences in adults’ spatial abilities, learning environmental layout, and wayfinding behavior. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2, 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011445624332.
Klencklen, G., Després, O., & Dufour, A. (2012). What do we know about aging and spatial cognition? Reviews and perspectives. Ageing Research Reviews, 11, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2011.10.001.
Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., Rasch, B., & Blajenkova, O. (2006). Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1192.
Labate, E., Pazzaglia, F., & Hegarty, M. (2014). What working memory subcomponents are needed in the acquisition of survey knowledge? Evidence from direction estimation and shortcut tasks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.007.
Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544230.
Lee, P. U., & Tversky, B. (2001). Costs of switching perspectives in route and survey descriptions. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4cz5n7j3
Lithfous, S., Dufour, A., & Després, O. (2013). Spatial navigation in normal aging and the prodromal stage of Alzheimer’s disease: Insights from imaging and behavioral studies. Ageing Research Reviews, 12, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2012.04.007.
Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial Working Memory. Hove: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Mellet, E., Laou, L., Petit, L., Zago, L., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2010). Impact of virtual reality on the neural representation of an environment. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 1065–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20917.
Meneghetti, C., Borella, E., Carbone, E., Martinelli, M., & De Beni, R. (2016). Environment learning using descriptions or navigation: The involvement of working memory in young and older adults. British Journal of Psychology, 107, 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12145.
Meneghetti, C., Borella, E., Grasso, I., & De Beni, R. (2012). Learning a route using a map and/or description in young and older adults. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.603694.
Meneghetti, C., Borella, E., Gyselinck, V., & De Beni, R. (2012). Age differences in environment route learning: The role of input and recall-test modalities in young and older adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 884–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.006.
Meneghetti, C., Borella, E., Pastore, M., & De Beni, R. (2014). The role of spatial abilities and self-assessments in cardinal point orientation across the lifespan. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.006.
Meneghetti, C., & Muffato, V. (2017). When environmental information is conveyed using descriptions: The role of perspectives and strategies. In International conference on spatial information theory (pp. 235–244). Springer, International Publishing.
Meneghetti, C., Muffato, V., Borella, E., & De Beni, R. (2018). Map learning in normal aging: The role of individual visuo-spatial abilities and implications. Current Alzheimer Research, 15, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205014666171030113515.
Meneghetti, C., Muffato, V., Suitner, C., De Beni, R., & Borella, E. (2015). Map learning in young and older adults: The influence of perceived stereotype threat. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.015.
Meneghetti, C., Muffato, V., Varotto, D., & De Beni, R. (2017). How directions of route descriptions influence orientation specificity: The contribution of spatial abilities. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 81, 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0754-5.
Meneghetti, C., Pazzaglia, F., & De Beni, R. (2011). Spatial mental representations derived from survey and route descriptions: When individuals prefer an extrinsic frame of reference. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.12.003.
Mitolo, M., Gardini, S., Caffarra, P., Ronconi, L., Venneri, A., & Pazzaglia, F. (2015). Relationship between spatial ability, visuospatial working memory and self-assessed spatial orientation ability: A study in older adults. Cognitive Processing, 16, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0647-3.
Moffat, S. D. (2009). Aging and spatial navigation: What do we know and where do we go? Neuropsychology Review, 19, 478–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-009-9120-3.
Morganti, F., Stefanini, S., & Riva, G. (2013). From allo- to egocentric spatial ability in early Alzheimer’s disease: a study with virtual reality spatial tasks. Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2013.854762.
Muffato, V., Meneghetti, C., & De Beni, R. (2016). Not all is lost in older adults’ route learning: The role of visuo-spatial abilities and type of task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.003.
Muffato, V., Meneghetti, C., Di Ruocco, V., & De Beni, R. (2017). When young and older adults learn a map: The influence of individual visuo-spatial factors. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.12.002.
Nadel, L. (2013). Cognitive maps. In D. E. Waller & L. E. Nadel (Eds.), Handbook of spatial cognition (pp. 115–171). Worcester: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13936-009.
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bèdirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
Padgitt, A. J., & Hund, A. M. (2012). How good are these directions? Determining direction quality and wayfinding efficiency. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.01.007.
Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2000). Differenze individuali nella rappresentazione dello spazio e nell’abilità di orientamento: Presentazione di un questionario autovalutativo. Giornale Italiano Di Psicologia, 27, 627–650.
Pazzaglia, F., & Meneghetti, C. (2017). Acquiring spatial knowledge from different sources and perspectives: Abilities, strategies and representations. In J. M. Zacks & H. A. Taylor (Eds.), Representations in mind and world. Essays inspired by Barbara Tversky (pp. 120–134). New York: Routledge.
Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., & Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Memory and Cognition, 27, 741–750. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211566.
Richardson, J. T. E., & Vecchi, T. (2002). A jigsaw-puzzle imagery task for assessing active visuospatial processes in old and young people. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers: A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 34, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195425.
Rovine, M. J., & Weisman, G. D. (1989). Sketch-map variables as predictors of way-finding performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80036-2.
Ruggiero, G., D’Errico, O., & Iachini, T. (2016). Development of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations from childhood to elderly age. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 80, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0658-9.
Salthouse, T. A., & Siedlecki, K. L. (2007). Efficiency of route selection as a function of adult age. Brain and Cognition, 63, 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2006.09.006.
Serino, S., Cipresso, P., Morganti, F., & Riva, G. (2014). The role of egocentric and allocentric abilities in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews, 16, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2014.04.004.
Serino, S., Morganti, F., Di Stefano, F., & Riva, G. (2015). Detecting early egocentric and allocentric impairments deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: An experimental study with virtual reality. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2015.00088.
Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2004). Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.158.
Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 10, 9–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60007-5.
Sjolinder, M., Hook, K., Nilsson, L. G., & Andersson, G. (2005). Age differences and the acquisition of spatial knowledge in a three-dimensional environment: Evaluating the use of an overview map as a navigation aid. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 63, 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.024.
Stern, Y. (2009). Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2015–2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004.
Taillade, M., N’Kaoua, B., & Sauzéon, H. (2016). Age-related differences and cognitive correlates of self-reported and direct navigation performance: The effect of real and virtual test conditions manipulation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02034.
Taylor, H. A., Naylor, S. J., & Chechile, N. A. (1999). Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective. Memory and Cognition, 27, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211414.
Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90014-O.
Techentin, C., Voyer, D., & Voyer, S. D. (2014). Spatial abilities and aging: A meta-analysis. Experimental Aging Research, 40, 395–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2014.926773.
Thorndyke, P. W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90019-6.
Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061626.
Van Hooren, S. A. H., Valentijn, A. M., Bosma, H., Ponds, R. W. H. M., Van Boxtel, M. P. J., & Jolles, J. (2007). Cognitive functioning in healthy older adults aged 64–81: A cohort study into the effects of age, sex, and education. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/138255890969483.
Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 192–196. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206482.
Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—revised. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
Weisberg, S. M., & Newcombe, N. S. (2016). How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 768–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000200.
Wen, W., Ishikawa, T., & Sato, T. (2013). Individual differences in the encoding processes of egocentric and allocentric survey knowledge. Cognitive Science, 37, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12005.
Wiener, J. M., & Mallot, H. A. (2003). “Fine-to-coarse” route planning and navigation in regionalized environments. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427633scc0304_5.
Wilkniss, S. M., Jones, M. G., Korol, D. L., Gold, P. E., & Manning, C. a. (1997). Age-related differences in an ecologically based study of route learning. Psychology and Aging, 12, 372–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.372.
Wolbers, T., & Hegarty, M. (2010). What determines our navigational abilities? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA, 310, 2191. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
Yamamoto, N., & DeGirolamo, G. J. (2012). Differential effects of aging on spatial learning through exploratory navigation and map reading. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 4, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2012.00014.
Zhang, H., Zherdeva, K., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2014). Different “routes” to a cognitive map: Dissociable forms of spatial knowledge derived from route and cartographic map learning. Memory and Cognition, 42, 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0418-x.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Giovanni Leone for helping with video recording, and Annarita Lepre and Martina Nicolis for helping with data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muffato, V., Meneghetti, C. & De Beni, R. Spatial mental representations: the influence of age on route learning from maps and navigation. Psychological Research 83, 1836–1850 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1033-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1033-4