Abstract
As part of filtering irrelevant information from entering visual working memory (VWM) and selecting only the relevant information for further processing the system should first tag the pieces of information as relevant or irrelevant. We manipulated difficulty of tagging items as relevant or irrelevant by applying perceptual grouping cues to investigate if it can improve filtering performance in VWM. Participants performed a change-detection task with three targets, six targets, or three targets and three distractors (filtering condition) in the memory display, and were asked to remember the colors (Experiments 1–2) or the orientations (Experiments 3–5) of the targets and ignore the distractors. In the filtering conditions, either the targets (Experiments 1, 3, and 4) or the distractors (Experiments 2 and 5) formed an illusory object (a Kanizsa triangle), appeared in a triangle-like configuration (grouping by proximity), or appeared at random positions (non-grouping). Grouping the targets improved filtering performance relative to non-grouping. Moreover, the illusory object cue further improved filtering performance beyond a proximity cue, but only when the cue was compatible with the task. When the distractors were grouped, the proximity cue improved filtering performance, and the illusory object cue, despite being a potent grouping cue, failed to improve filtering performance when it was compatible with the task. We suggest that the grouping cues advanced tagging of the grouped items. Yet, when the grouping cue strongly enhanced processing of the distractors, the tagging failed, such that the preliminary process of estimating incoming items led to full processing of the grouped items.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
02 July 2018
The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.
References
Allon, A. S., Balaban, H., & Luria, R. (2014). How low can you go? Changing the resolution of novel complex objects in visual working memory according to task demands. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00265.
Allon, A. S., & Luria, R. (2016). prepdat—An R package for preparing experimental data for statistical analysis. Journal of Open Research Software, 4(1), e43. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.134.
Allon, A. S., & Luria, R. (2017). Compensation mechanisms that improve distractor filtering are short-lived. Cognition, 164, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.020.
Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(25), 10367–10371.
Arnell, K. M., & Stubitz, S. M. (2010). Attentional blink magnitude is predicted by the ability to keep irrelevant material out of working memory. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 74(5), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0265-8.
Astle, D. E., Harvey, H., Stokes, M., Mohseni, H., Nobre, A. C., & Scerif, G. (2014). Distinct neural mechanisms of individual and developmental differences in VSTM capacity: Mechanisms of VSTM capacity. Developmental Psychobiology, 56(4), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21126.
Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18(7), 622–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01949.x.
Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2008). The bouncer in the brain. Nat Neurosci, 11(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0108-5.
Baylis, G. C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factor. Perception and Psychophysics, 51(2), 145–162.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
Cashdollar, N., Fukuda, K., Bocklage, A., Aurtenetxe, S., Vogel, E. K., & Gazzaley, A. (2013). Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging. Psychology and Aging, 28(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029899.
Cowan, N. (2001). Metatheory of storage capacity limits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(01), 154–176.
Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Scott Saults, J., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51(1), 42–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001.
Cowan, N., Fristoe, N. M., Elliott, E. M., Brunner, R. P., & Saults, J. S. (2006). Scope of attention, control of attention, and intelligence in children and adults. Memory and Cognition, 34(8), 1754–1768. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195936.
Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1994). Parallel detection of Kanizsa subjective figures in the human visual system. Nature, 371(6500), 791–793. https://doi.org/10.1038/371791a0.
Dent, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Braithwaite, J. J. (2011). Spreading suppression and the guidance of search by movement: Evidence from negative color carry-over effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18(4), 690–696. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0091-z.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501–517.
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.
Fahrenfort, J. J., van Leeuwen, J., Olivers, C. N. L., & Hogendoorn, H. (2017). Perceptual integration without conscious access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(14), 3744–3749. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617268114.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(5), 741–753.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2008). Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture. Visual Cognition, 16(5), 616–642.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(2), 317.
Fukuda, K., Vogel, E., Mayr, U., & Awh, E. (2010). Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(5), 673–679. https://doi.org/10.3758/17.5.673.
Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Human variation in overriding attentional capture. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(27), 8726–8733. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2145-09.2009.
Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2011). Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture. Psychological Science, 22(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398493.
Gao, Z., Gao, Q., Tang, N., Shui, R., & Shen, M. (2016). Organization principles in visual working memory: Evidence from sequential stimulus display. Cognition, 146, 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.005.
Gao, Z., Xu, X., Chen, Z., Yin, J., Shen, M., & Shui, R. (2011). Contralateral delay activity tracks object identity information in visual short term memory. Brain Research, 1406, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.049.
Gaspar, J. M., Christie, G. J., Prime, D. J., Jolicœur, P., & McDonald, J. J. (2016). Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(13), 3693–3698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523471113.
Gold, J. M., Fuller, R. L., Robinson, B. M., McMahon, R. P., Braun, E. L., & Luck, S. J. (2006). Intact attentional control of working memory encoding in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(4), 658–673. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.4.658.
Gold, J. M., Wilk, C. M., McMahon, R. P., Buchanan, R. W., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Working memory for visual features and conjunctions in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.1.61.
Gulbinaite, R., Johnson, A., de Jong, R., Morey, C. C., & van Rijn, H. (2014). Dissociable mechanisms underlying individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Neuroimage, 99, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.060.
Harris, J. J., Schwarzkopf, D. S., Song, C., Bahrami, B., & Rees, G. (2011). Contextual illusions reveal the limit of unconscious visual processing. Psychological Science, 22(3), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611399293.
Hickey, C., Di Lollo, V., & McDonald, J. J. (2009). Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(4), 760–775. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21039.
Humphreys, G. W., Quinlan, P. T., & Riddoch, M. J. (1989). Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.3.258.
Johnson, M. K., McMahon, R. P., Robinson, B. M., Harvey, A. N., Hahn, B., Leonard, C. J., & Gold, J. M. (2013). The relationship between working memory capacity and broad measures of cognitive ability in healthy adults and people with schizophrenia. Neuropsychology, 27(2), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032060.
Jost, K., Bryck, R. L., Vogel, E. K., & Mayr, U. (2011). Are old adults just like low working memory young adults? Filtering efficiency and age differences in visual working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 21(5), 1147–1154. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq185.
Jost, K., & Mayr, U. (2016). Switching between filter settings reduces the efficient utilization of visual working memory. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 16(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0380-5.
Kanizsa, G. (1976). Subjective contours. Scientific American, 234(4), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0476-48.
Kimchi, R., Yeshurun, Y., & Cohen-Savransky, A. (2007). Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(1), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194045.
Kimchi, R., Yeshurun, Y., Spehar, B., & Pirkner, Y. (2016). Perceptual organization, visual attention, and objecthood. Quantitative Approaches in Gestalt Perception, 126, 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.07.008.
Lee, E.-Y., Cowan, N., Vogel, E. K., Rolan, T., Valle-Inclan, F., & Hackley, S. A. (2010). Visual working memory deficits in patients with Parkinson’s disease are due to both reduced storage capacity and impaired ability to filter out irrelevant information. Brain, 133(9), 2677–2689. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq197.
Li, C.-H., He, X., Wang, Y.-J., Hu, Z., & Guo, C.-Y. (2017). Visual working memory capacity can be increased by training on distractor filtering efficiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00196.
Lin, P.-H., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The influence of similarity on visual working memory representations. Visual Cognition, 17(3), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280701766313.
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(4), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210951.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(6657), 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/36846.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (2013). Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(8), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006.
Luria, R., Balaban, H., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2016). The contralateral delay activity as a neural measure of visual working memory. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 62, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.003.
Luria, R., & Vogel, E. K. (2014). Come together, right now: dynamic overwriting of an object’s history through common fate. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(8), 1819–1828. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00584.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163.
McNab, F., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Dissociating distractor-filtering at encoding and during maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036013.
McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008). Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 11(1), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2024.
Moors, P., Wagemans, J., van Ee, R., & de-Wit, L. (2016). No evidence for surface organization in Kanizsa configurations during continuous flash suppression. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78(3), 902–914. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1043-x.
Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Owens, M., Koster, E. H. W., & Derakshan, N. (2012). Impaired filtering of irrelevant information in dysphoria: An ERP study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(7), 752–763. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr050.
Parra, M. A., Abrahams, S., Fabi, K., Logie, R., Luzzi, S., & Sala, S. D. (2009). Short-term memory binding deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 132(4), 1057–1066. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp036.
Parra, M. A., Abrahams, S., Logie, R. H., Méndez, L. G., Lopera, F., & Della Sala, S. (2010). Visual short-term memory binding deficits in familial Alzheimer’s disease. Brain, 133(9), 2702–2713. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq148.
Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(4), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210419.
Peterson, D. J., & Berryhill, M. E. (2013). The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(6), 1282–1289. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0460-x.
Peterson, D. J., Gözenman, F., Arciniega, H., & Berryhill, M. E. (2015). Contralateral delay activity tracks the influence of Gestalt grouping principles on active visual working memory representations. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(7), 2270–2283. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0929-y.
Poljac, E., de-Wit, L., & Wagemans, J. (2012). Perceptual wholes can reduce the conscious accessibility of their parts. Cognition, 123(2), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.01.001.
Quinlan, P. T., & Cohen, D. J. (2012). Grouping and binding in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(5), 1432–1438. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027866.
Richard, A. M., Lee, H., & Vecera, S. P. (2008). Attentional spreading in object-based attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(4), 842–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.842.
Sawaki, R., Geng, J. J., & Luck, S. J. (2012). A common neural mechanism for preventing and terminating the allocation of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(31), 10725–10736. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1864-12.2012.
Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2010). Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(6), 1455–1470. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1455.
Sawaki, R., & Luck, S. J. (2011). Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory. Visual Cognition, 19(7), 956–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2011.603709.
Schwarzkopf, S. D., & Rees, G. (2015). Perceptual organization and consciousness. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shen, M., Yu, W., Xu, X., & Gao, Z. (2012). Building blocks of visual working memory: Objects or boolean maps? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00348.
Shen, M., Yu, W., Xu, X., & Gao, Z. (2013). Building blocks of visual working memory: Objects or boolean maps? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00348.
Spehar, B. (2000). Degraded illusory contour formation with non-uniform inducers in Kanizsa configurations: The role of contrast polarity. Vision Research, 40(19), 2653–2659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00109-7.
Spehar, B., & Clifford, C. W. (2003). When does illusory contour formation depend on contrast polarity? Vision Research, 43(18), 1915–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00274-8.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643.
Theeuwes, J., & Godijn, R. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(5), 764–770.
Treisman, A. (1982). Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(2), 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.8.2.194.
Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2014). Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.01.003.
Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2015). Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(5), 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00765.
Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2008). How to exploit diversity for scientific gain: Using individual differences to constrain cognitive theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00569.x.
Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428(6984), 748–751.
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438(7067), 500–503. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04171.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.27.1.92.
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029333.
Wang, L., Weng, X., & He, S. (2012). Perceptual grouping without awareness: Superiority of Kanizsa triangle in breaking interocular suppression. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040106.
Woodman, G. F., Vecera, S. P., & Luck, S. J. (2003). Perceptual organization influences visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(1), 80–87.
Xu, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature, 440(7080), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04262.
Yantis, S. (1996). Attentional capture in vision. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging Operations in the Study of Visual Selective Attention (pp. 45–76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10187-002.
Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453(7192), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06860.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation Grant number 862/17 awarded to Roy Luria.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Participants in all five experiments of the current study gave their informed consent after the procedures of a protocol approved by the Ethics Committee at Tel Aviv University. This study was supported by the Israel Science Foundation Grant number 1696-13 awarded to Roy Luria.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allon, A.S., Vixman, G. & Luria, R. Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory. Psychological Research 83, 1656–1672 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1032-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1032-5