The unimanual handle-to-hand correspondence effect: evidence for a location coding account
- 79 Downloads
The handle-to-hand correspondence effect refers to faster and more accurate responses when the responding hand is aligned with the graspable part of an object tool, compared to when they lay on opposite sides. We performed four behavioral experiments to investigate whether this effect depends on the activation of grasping affordances (affordance activation account) or is to be traced back to a Simon effect, resulting from the spatial coding of stimuli and responses and from their dimensional overlap (location coding account). We manipulated the availability of a response alternative by requiring participants to perform either a unimanual go/no-go task (absence of a response alternative) or a joint go/no-go task (available response alternative) and the type of response required (button-press or grasping response). We found no handle-to-hand correspondence effect in the individual go/no-go task either when a button-press (Experiment 1A) or a grasping (Experiment 2A) response was required, whereas a significant effect emerged in the joint go/no-go task, irrespective of response modality (Experiments1B and 2B). These results do not support the idea that complex motor affordances are activated for meaningful objects, but are rather consistent with the more parsimonious location coding account.
A.P. was supported by the START Programme der Medizinischen Fakultät der RWTH-Aachen (START Projekt 691240, 144/12). C.I. was supported by a grant from the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Fondo di Ateneo per la Ricerca (FAR2014).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
A. P. declares that he has no conflict of interest. L. L. declares that she has no conflict of interest. F. B. declares that he has no conflict of interest. S. R. declares that he has no conflict of interest. C. I. declares that she has no conflict of interest. R. N. declares that he has no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Alluisi, E. A., & Warm, J. S. (1990). Things that go together: A review of stimulus-response compatibility and related effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 3–30). Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
- Berlucchi, G., Crea, F., Di Stefano, M., & Tassinari, G. (1977). Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 505–517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buccino, G., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rodà, F., & Riggio, L. (2009). Broken affordances, broken objects: a TMS study. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3074–3078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cho, D. T., & Proctor, R. W. (2013). Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: Evidence for a basis in spatial coding. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 77, 618–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0458-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lien, M.-C., Gray, D., Jardin, E., & Proctor, R. W. (2014). Correspondence effects are primarily modulated by object location not grasping affordance: An event-related potentials study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26,, 679–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.940959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lien, M.-C., Jardin, E., & Proctor, R. (2013). An electrophysiological study of the object-based correspondence effect: Is the effect triggered by the intended grasping action? Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 75, 1862–1882. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0523-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2010b). Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: the effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2190–2201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.486903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Rubichi, S., Ricciardelli, P., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2010a). Real life motor training modifies spatial performance: The advantage of being drummers. American Journal of Psychology, 123, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.2.0169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pellicano, A., Koch, I., & Binkofski, F. (2017b). Location-Coding Account Versus Affordance-Activation Account in Handle-to-Hand Correspondence Effects: Evidence of Simon-Like Effects Based on the Coding of Action Direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1647–1666. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Proctor, R. W., & Miles, J. D. (2014). Does the concept of affordance add anything to explanations of stimulus-response compatibility effects? In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 60, pp. 227–266). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus–response compatibility. An integrated perspective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar