Abstract
Exposure to audiovisual stimuli with a consistent spatial misalignment seems to result in a recalibration of unisensory auditory spatial representations. The previous studies have suggested that this so-called ventriloquism aftereffect is confined to the trained region of space, but yielded inconsistent results as to whether or not recalibration generalizes to untrained sound frequencies. Here, we reassessed the spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect by testing whether auditory spatial perception can be independently recalibrated for two different sound frequencies and/or at two different spatial locations. Recalibration was confined to locations within the trained hemifield, suggesting that spatial representations were independently adjusted for the two hemifields. The frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect depended on the presence or the absence of conflicting audiovisual adaptation stimuli within the same hemifield. Moreover, adaptation of two different sound frequencies in opposite directions (leftward vs. rightward) resulted in a selective suppression of leftward recalibration, even when the adapting stimuli were presented in different hemifields. Thus, instead of representing a fixed stimulus-driven process, cross-modal recalibration seems to critically depend on the sensory context and takes into account inconsistencies in the cross-modal input.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology, 14, 257–262.
Altmann, C. F., Henning, M., Döring, M. K., & Kaiser, J. (2008). Effects of feature-selective attention on auditory pattern and location processing. NeuroImage, 41, 69–79.
Bertelson, P., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 482–489.
Bertelson, P., Frissen, I., Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (2006). The aftereffects of ventriloquism: Patterns of spatial generalization. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 428–436.
Bertelson, P., & Radeau, M. (1981). Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 578–584.
Bonath, B., Noesselt, T., Krauel, K., Tyll, S., Tempelmann, C., & Hillyard, S. A. (2014). Audio-visual synchrony modulates the ventriloquist illusion and its neural/spatial representation in the auditory cortex. NeuroImage, 98, 425–434.
Bonath, B., Noesselt, T., Martinez, A., Mishra, J., Schwiecker, K., Heinze, H.-J., & Hillyard, S. A. (2007). Neural basis of the ventriloquist illusion. Current Biology, 17, 1697–1703.
Bruns, P., Liebnau, R., & Röder, B. (2011). Cross-modal training induces changes in spatial representations early in the auditory processing pathway. Psychological Science, 22, 1120–1126.
Bruns, P., Maiworm, M., & Röder, B. (2014). Reward expectation influences audiovisual spatial integration. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 76, 1815–1827.
Bruns, P., & Röder, B. (2015). Sensory recalibration integrates information from the immediate and the cumulative past. Scientific Reports, 5, 12739.
Bruns, P., Spence, C., & Röder, B. (2011). Tactile recalibration of auditory spatial representations. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 333–344.
Callan, A., Callan, D., & Ando, H. (2015). An fMRI study of the ventriloquism effect. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 4248–4258.
Chen, L., & Vroomen, J. (2013). Intersensory binding across space and time: A tutorial review. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 75, 790–811.
Dyson, B. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (2004). Stimulus processing constraints in audition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1117–1131.
Eramudugolla, R., Kamke, M. R., Soto-Faraco, S., & Mattingley, J. B. (2011). Perceptual load influences auditory space perception in the ventriloquist aftereffect. Cognition, 118, 62–74.
Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162–169.
Formisano, E., Kim, D.-S., Di Salle, F., van de Moortele, P.-F., Ugurbil, K., & Goebel, R. (2003). Mirror-symmetric tonotopic maps in human primary auditory cortex. Neuron, 40, 859–869.
Frissen, I., Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (2012). The aftereffects of ventriloquism: The time course of the visual recalibration of auditory localization. Seeing and Perceiving, 25, 1–14.
Frissen, I., Vroomen, J., de Gelder, B., & Bertelson, P. (2003). The aftereffects of ventriloquism: Are they sound-frequency specific? Acta Psychologica, 113, 315–327.
Frissen, I., Vroomen, J., de Gelder, B., & Bertelson, P. (2005). The aftereffects of ventriloquism: Generalization across sound-frequencies. Acta Psychologica, 118, 93–100.
Heron, J., Roach, N. W., Hanson, J. V. M., McGraw, P. V., & Whitaker, D. (2012). Audiovisual time perception is spatially specific. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 477–485.
Heron, J., Roach, N. W., Whitaker, D., & Hanson, J. V. M. (2010). Attention regulates the plasticity of multisensory timing. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1755–1762.
Humphries, C., Liebenthal, E., & Binder, J. R. (2010). Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex. NeuroImage, 50, 1202–1211.
Ikumi, N., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2014). Selective attention modulates the direction of audio-visual temporal recalibration. PLoS One, 9, e99311.
King, A. J. (2009). Visual influences on auditory spatial learning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 364, 331–339.
Kopčo, N., Lin, I.-F., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., & Groh, J. M. (2009). Reference frame of the ventriloquism aftereffect. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 13809–13814.
Lewald, J. (2002). Rapid adaptation to auditory-visual spatial disparity. Learning and Memory, 9, 268–278.
Lewald, J., Ehrenstein, W. H., & Guski, R. (2001). Spatio-temporal constraints for auditory-visual integration. Behavioural Brain Research, 121, 69–79.
Magezi, D. A., & Krumbholz, K. (2010). Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 1997–2007.
Magosso, E., Cona, F., & Ursino, M. (2013). A neural network model can explain ventriloquism aftereffect and its generalization across sound frequencies. BioMed Research International, 2013, 475427.
Magosso, E., Cuppini, C., & Ursino, M. (2012). A neural network model of ventriloquism effect and aftereffect. PLoS One, 7, e42503.
Maiworm, M., Bellantoni, M., Spence, C., & Röder, B. (2012). When emotional valence modulates audiovisual integration. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 74, 1302–1311.
McAlpine, D., & Grothe, B. (2003). Sound localization and delay lines—do mammals fit the model? Trends in Neurosciences, 26, 347–350.
Middlebrooks, J. C., & Green, D. M. (1991). Sound localization by human listeners. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 135–159.
Miller, L. M., & Recanzone, G. H. (2009). Populations of auditory cortical neurons can accurately encode acoustic space across stimulus intensity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 106, 5931–5935.
Mondor, T. A., Zatorre, R. J., & Terrio, N. A. (1998). Constraints on the selection of auditory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 24, 66–79.
Mullette-Gillman, O. A., Cohen, Y. E., & Groh, J. M. (2005). Eye-centered, head-centered, and complex coding of visual and auditory targets in the intraparietal sulcus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 2331–2352.
Phillips, D. P., & Hall, S. E. (2005). Psychophysical evidence for adaptation of central auditory processors for interaural differences in time and level. Hearing Research, 202, 188–199.
Radeau, M., & Bertelson, P. (1974). The after-effects of ventriloquism. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 63–71.
Recanzone, G. H. (1998). Rapidly induced auditory plasticity: The ventriloquism aftereffect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 95, 869–875.
Recanzone, G. H. (2009). Interactions of auditory and visual stimuli in space and time. Hearing Research, 258, 89–99.
Recanzone, G. H., & Sutter, M. L. (2008). The biological basis of audition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 119–142.
Roseboom, W., & Arnold, D. H. (2011). Twice upon a time: Multiple concurrent temporal recalibrations of audiovisual speech. Psychological Science, 22, 872–877.
Roseboom, W., Kawabe, T., & Nishida, S. (2013). Audio-visual temporal recalibration can be constrained by content cues regardless of spatial overlap. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 189.
Salminen, N. H., May, P. J. C., Alku, P., & Tiitinen, H. (2009). A population rate code of auditory space in the human cortex. PLoS One, 4, e7600.
Sarlat, L., Warusfel, O., & Viaud-Delmon, I. (2006). Ventriloquism aftereffects occur in the rear hemisphere. Neuroscience Letters, 404, 324–329.
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 411–417.
Shams, L., Wozny, D. R., Kim, R., & Seitz, A. R. (2011). Influences of multisensory experience on subsequent unisensory processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 264.
Shrem, T., & Deouell, L. Y. (2014). Frequency-dependent auditory space representation in the human planum temporale. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 524.
Slutsky, D. A., & Recanzone, G. H. (2001). Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect. NeuroReport, 12, 7–10.
Stecker, G. C., Harrington, I. A., & Middlebrooks, J. C. (2005). Location coding by opponent neural populations in the auditory cortex. PLoS Biology, 3, e78.
Stricanne, B., Andersen, R. A., & Mazzoni, P. (1996). Eye-centered, head-centered, and intermediate coding of remembered sound locations in area LIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 2071–2076.
Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 400–410.
Tardif, E., Spierer, L., Clarke, S., & Murray, M. M. (2008). Interactions between auditory ‘what’ and ‘where’ pathways revealed by enhanced near-threshold discrimination of frequency and position. Neuropsychologia, 46, 958–966.
Van der Burg, E., Awh, E., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2013). The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item. Psychological Science, 24, 345–351.
Vigneault-MacLean, B. K., Hall, S. E., & Phillips, D. P. (2007). The effects of lateralized adaptors on lateral position judgements of tones within and across frequency channels. Hearing Research, 224, 93–100.
Werner-Reiss, U., Kelly, K. A., Trause, A. S., Underhill, A. M., & Groh, J. M. (2003). Eye position affects activity in primary auditory cortex of primates. Current Biology, 13, 554–562.
Woods, T. M., & Recanzone, G. H. (2004). Visually induced plasticity of auditory spatial perception in macaques. Current Biology, 14, 1559–1564.
Wozny, D. R., & Shams, L. (2011). Recalibration of auditory space following milliseconds of cross-modal discrepancy. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 4607–4612.
Zaidel, A., Turner, A. H., & Angelaki, D. E. (2011). Multisensory calibration is independent of cue reliability. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 13949–13962.
Zierul, B., Röder, B., Tempelmann, C., Bruns, P., & Noesselt, T. (2017). The role of auditory cortex in the spatial ventriloquism aftereffect. NeuroImage, 162, 257–268.
Zwiers, M. P., van Opstal, A. J., & Paige, G. D. (2003). Plasticity in human sound localization induced by compressed spatial vision. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 175–181.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG) [BR 4913/2-1 to P.B. and TRR 169 A1 to B.R.]. We thank Philipp Dehmel, Alexander Gornik and Samantha Schröder for help running participants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bruns, P., Röder, B. Spatial and frequency specificity of the ventriloquism aftereffect revisited. Psychological Research 83, 1400–1415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0965-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0965-4