Trial-by-trial switching between procedural and declarative categorization systems
- 195 Downloads
Considerable evidence suggests that human category learning recruits multiple memory systems. A popular assumption is that procedural memory is used to form stimulus-to-response mappings, whereas declarative memory is used to form and test explicit rules about category membership. The multiple systems framework has been successful in motivating and accounting for a broad array of empirical observations over the past 20 years. Even so, only a couple of studies have examined how the different categorization systems interact. Both previous studies suggest that switching between explicit and procedural responding is extremely difficult. But they leave unanswered the critical questions of whether trial-by-trial system switching is possible, and if so, whether it is qualitatively different than trial-by-trial switching between two explicit tasks. The experiment described in this article addressed these questions. The results (1) confirm that effective trial-by-trial system switching, although difficult, is possible; (2) suggest that switching between tasks mediated by different memory systems is more difficult than switching between two declarative memory tasks; and (3) point to a serious shortcoming of current category-learning theories.
KeywordsSwitch Cost Category Structure System Switching Switch Trial Procedural Strategy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
The research described in this article was supported in part by Grant Number 2R01MH063760 from NIMH and by AFOSR Grant FA9550-12-1-0355.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Ashby, F. G., & O’Brien, J. B. (2005). Category learning and multiple memory systems. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 2, 83–89.Google Scholar
- Cantwell, G., Crossley, M. J., & Ashby, F. G. (2015). Multiple stages of learning in perceptual categorization: Evidence and neurocomputational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1–16.Google Scholar
- Eichenbaum, H., & Cohen, N. J. (2001). From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fukunaga, K. (1990). Introduction to statistical pattern recognition. Academic press.Google Scholar
- Nagahama, Y., Okada, T., Katsumi, Y., Hayashi, T., Yamauchi, H., Oyanagi, C., et al. (2001). Dissociable mechanisms of attentional control within the human prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 11(1), 85–92.Google Scholar
- Nomura, E., Maddox, W., Filoteo, J., Ing, A., Gitelman, D., Parrish, T., et al. (2007). Neural correlates of rule-based and information-integration visual category learning. Cerebral Cortex, 17(1), 37–43.Google Scholar
- Tulving, E., & Craik, F, I. (2000). The Oxford handbook of memory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar