Voluntary eye movements direct attention on the mental number space
- 488 Downloads
Growing evidence suggests that orienting visual attention in space can influence the processing of numerical magnitude, with leftward orienting speeding up the processing of small numbers relative to larger ones and the converse for rightward orienting. The manipulation of eye movements is a convenient way to direct visuospatial attention, but several aspects of the complex relationship between eye movements, attention orienting and number processing remain unexplored. In a previous study, we observed that inducing involuntary, reflexive eye movements by means of optokinetic stimulation affected number processing only when numerical magnitude was task relevant (i.e., during magnitude comparison, but not during parity judgment; Ranzini et al., in J Cogn Psychol 27, 459–470, (2015). Here, we investigated whether processing of task-irrelevant numerical magnitude can be modulated by voluntary eye movements, and whether the type of eye movements (smooth pursuit vs. saccades) would influence this interaction. Participants tracked with their gaze a dot while listening to a digit. The numerical task was to indicate whether the digit was odd or even through non-spatial, verbal responses. The dot could move leftward or rightward either continuously, allowing tracking by smooth pursuit eye movements, or in discrete steps across a series of adjacent locations, triggering a sequence of saccades. Both smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements similarly affected number processing and modulated response times for large numbers as a function of direction of motion. These findings suggest that voluntary eye movements redirect attention in mental number space and highlight that eye movements should play a key factor in the investigation of number–space interactions.
KeywordsSmooth Pursuit Number Processing Numerical Magnitude Attention Orienting Visuospatial Attention
This study was supported by University of Padova Strategic Grant “NEURAT” to M.Z.
- Bremmer, F., Distler, C., & Hoffmann, K. P. (1997). Eye position effects in monkey cortex. II. Pursuit- and fixation-related activity in posterior parietal areas LIP and 7A. Jouranl of Neurophysiology, 77, 962–977.Google Scholar
- Hartmann, M., Mast, F. W., & Fischer, M. H. (2015). Counting is a spatial process: Evidence from eye movements. Psychological Research. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0722-5
- Myachykov, A., Ellis, R., Cangelosi, A., & Fischer, M. H. (2016). Ocular drift along the mental number line. Psychological Research. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0731-4
- Pizzamiglio, L., Antonucci, G., Guariglia, C., Judica, A., Montenero, P., Razzano, C., & Zoccolotti, P. (1992). Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorders in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14, 901–923.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 2–25.Google Scholar
- Prifts, K., Pitteri, M., Meneghello, F., Umiltà, C., & Zorzi, M. (2012). Optokinetic stimulation modulates neglect for the number space: Evidence from mental number interval bisection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 23.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with manual and saccadic responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 651-664.Google Scholar
- Spivey, M. J., & Geng, J. J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research, 65(235), 241.Google Scholar
- Yu, X., Liu, J., Li, D., Cui, J., & Zhou, X. (2015). Dynamic mental number line in simple arithmetic. Psychological Research. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0730-5.