Skip to main content

Preferred, but not objective temperature predicts working memory depletion

Abstract

The present study investigated the relationship between objective temperature and subjective temperature preferences in predicting performance in simple and complex cognitive tasks. We assessed the impact of room temperature (warm and cold) on the ability to “update” (and monitor) working memory (WM) representations in two groups of participants, who differed in their subjective temperature preferences (warm-preferred vs. cold-preferred). Participants performed an N-back task in which conditions (1-back and 2-back) differ in their WM load and cognitive demands. Results showed that the preferred, but not the objective temperature predicts WM performance in the more resource-demanding (the 2-back) condition. We propose that subjective preferences are more reliable predictors of performance than objective temperature and that performing under the preferred temperature may counteract “ego-depletion” (i.e., reduced self-control after an exhausting cognitive task) when substantial cognitive control is required. Our findings do not only favor a cognitive approach over the environmental/physical approaches dominating the research on cognition–environment interactions, but they also have important, straightforward practical implications for the design of workplaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheema, A., & Patrick, V. M. (2012). Influence of warm versus cool temperatures on consumer choice: A resource depletion account. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 984–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colzato, L. S., Jongkees, B. J., Sellaro, R., & Hommel, B. (2013a). Working memory reloaded: tyrosine repletes updating in the N-back task. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience., 7, 200. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00200.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colzato, L. S., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Zmigrod, S., & Hommel, B. (2013b). Action video gaming and cognitive control: Playing first person shooter games is associated with improvement in working memory but not action inhibition. Psychological Research, 77, 234–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hammel, H. T. (1968). Regulation of internal body temperature. Annual Review of Physiology, 30, 641–710.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hancock, P. A. (1986). The effect of skill on performance under an environmental stressor. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 57, 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hancock, P. A., Ross, J., & Szalma, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of performance response under thermal stressors. Human Factors, 49, 851–877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hancock, P. A., & Vasmatzidis, I. (2003). Effects of heat stress on cognitive performance: The current state of knowledge. International Journal of Hyperthermia, 19, 355–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. IJzerman, H., & Semin, G. R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 20, 1214–1220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Miura, T. K., & Colflesh, G. J. H. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 615–622.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang, Y., Williams, L. E., Clark, M. S., Gray, J. R., & Bargh, J. A. (2011). Physical temperature effects on trust behavior: The role of insula. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 507–515.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pilcher, J., Nadler, E., & Busch, C. (2002). Effects of hot and cold temperature exposure on performance: A meta-analytic review. Ergonomics, 45, 682–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, J. A., Weis, A., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1989). Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 493–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by research grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) awarded to Lorenza S. Colzato (Vidi Grant: #452-12-001).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta Sellaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sellaro, R., Hommel, B., Manaï, M. et al. Preferred, but not objective temperature predicts working memory depletion. Psychological Research 79, 282–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0558-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • False Alarm
  • Work Memory
  • Prefer Temperature
  • Correct Rejection
  • Subjective Preference