Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 78, Issue 1, pp 18–27 | Cite as

Imagined own-body transformations during passive self-motion

Original Article

Abstract

Spatial perspective taking is a crucial social skill that underlies many of our everyday interactions. Previous studies have suggested that spatial perspective taking is an embodied process that involves the integration of both motor and proprioceptive information. Given the importance of vestibular signals for own-body perception, mental own-body imagery, and bodily self-consciousness, in the present study we hypothesized that vestibular stimulation due to passive own-body displacements should also modulate spatial perspective taking. Participants performed an own-body transformation task while being passively rotated in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction on a human motion platform. A congruency effect was observed, reflected in faster reaction times if the implied mental body rotation direction matched the actual rotation direction of the chair. These findings indicate that vestibular stimulation modulates and facilitates mental perspective taking, thereby highlighting the importance of integrating multisensory bodily information for spatial perspective taking.

Keywords

Vestibular Stimulation Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Response Hand Mental Transformation Angular Disparity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by a Marie Curie Grant (IEF grant 252713), the Virtual Embodiment and Robotic Re-Embodiment grant within the European FP7 framework (VERE grant 257695) and the Swiss Science Foundation (SINERGIA CRSII1-125135/1).

References

  1. Amorim, M. A., Isableu, B., & Jarraya, M. (2006). Embodied spatial transformations: “body analogy” for the mental rotation of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(3), 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelaki, D. E., & Cullen, K. E. (2008). Vestibular system: the many facets of a multimodal sense. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 125–150.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arzy, S., Thut, G., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., & Blanke, O. (2006). Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(31), 8074–8081.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Avraamides, M. N., & Kelly, J. W. (2008). Multiple systems of spatial memory and action. Cognitive Processes, 9(2), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, A. M. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: a new self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanke, O. (2012). Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(8), 556–571.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanke, O., Ionta, S., Fornari, E., Mohr, C., & Maeder, P. (2010). Mental imagery for full and upper human bodies: common right hemisphere activations and distinct extrastriate activations. Brain Topography, 23(3), 321–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanke, O., Mohr, C., Michel, C. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Brugger, P., Seeck, M., et al. (2005). Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(3), 550–557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Creem-Regehr, S. H. (2003). Updating space during imagined self- and array translations. Memory and Cognition, 31(6), 941–952.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Creem-Regehr, S. H., Neil, J. A., & Yeh, H. J. (2007). Neural correlates of two imagined egocentric transformations. Neuroimage, 35(2), 916–927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 483–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Falconer, C. J., & Mast, F. W. (2012). Balancing the mind. Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 332–339.Google Scholar
  13. Ferre, E. R., Bottini, G., & Haggard, P. (2011). Vestibular modulation of somatosensory perception. European Journal of Neuroscience, 34(8), 1337–1344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Figliozzi, F., Guariglia, P., Silvetti, M., Siegler, I., & Doricchi, F. (2005). Effects of vestibular rotatory accelerations on covert attentional orienting in vision and touch. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1638–1651.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fourkas, A. D., Ionta, S., & Aglioti, S. M. (2006). Influence of imagined posture and imagery modality on corticospinal excitability. Behavioral Brain Research, 168(2), 190–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner, M. R., & Potts, R. (2011). Domain general mechanisms account for imagined transformations of whole body perspective. Acta Psychologica, 137(3), 371–381.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Huttenlocher, J., & Presson, C. C. (1979). The coding and transformation of spatial information. Cognitive Psychology, 11(3), 375–394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ionta, S., Gassert, R., & Blanke, O. (2011a). Multi-sensory and sensorimotor foundation of bodily self-consciousness—an interdisciplinary approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 383.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ionta, S., Heydrich, L., Lenggenhager, B., Mouthon, M., Fornari, E., Chapuis, D., et al. (2011b). Multisensory mechanisms in temporo-parietal cortex support self-location and first-person perspective. Neuron, 70(2), 363–374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Karnath, H. O., & Dieterich, M. (2006). Spatial neglect—a vestibular disorder? Brain, 129(Pt 2), 293–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Keehner, M., Guerin, S. A., Miller, M. B., Turk, D. J., & Hegarty, M. (2006). Modulation of neural activity by angle of rotation during imagined spatial transformations. Neuroimage, 33(1), 391–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1989). Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kessler, K., & Rutherford, H. (2010). The two forms of visuo-spatial perspective taking are differently embodied and subserve different spatial prepositions. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 213.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kessler, K., & Thomson, L. A. (2010). The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference. Cognition, 114(1), 72–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kessler, K., & Wang, H. (2012). Spatial perspective taking is an embodied process, but not for everyone in the same way: differences predicted by sex and social skills score. Spatial Cognition and Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory and Cognition, 29(5), 745–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lackner, J. R., & Graybiel, A. (1977). Somatosensory motion after-effect following earth-horizontal rotation about the Z-axis: a new illusion. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 48(6), 501–502.Google Scholar
  28. Lenggenhager, B., Lopez, C., & Blanke, O. (2008). Influence of galvanic vestibular stimulation on egocentric and object-based mental transformations. Experimental Brain Research, 184(2), 211–221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lopez, C., Bachofner, C., Mercier, M., & Blanke, O. (2009). Gravity and observer’s body orientation influence the visual perception of human body postures. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 1.1–14.Google Scholar
  30. Lopez, C., & Blanke, O. (2011). The thalamocortical vestibular system in animals and humans. Brain Research Reviews, 67(1–2), 119–146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lopez, C., Halje, P., & Blanke, O. (2008). Body ownership and embodiment: vestibular and multisensory mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology, 38(3), 149–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lopez, C., Heydrich, L., Seeck, M., & Blanke, O. (2010a). Abnormal self-location and vestibular vertigo in a patient with right frontal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy and Behavior, 17(2), 289–292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopez, C., Lenggenhager, B., & Blanke, O. (2010b). How vestibular stimulation interacts with illusory hand ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 33–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. May, M. (2004). Imaginal perspective switches in remembered environments: transformation versus interference accounts. Cognitive Psychology, 48(2), 163–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. May, M., & Wendt, M. (2012). Separating mental transformations and spatial compatibility effects in the own body transformation task. Cognitive Processing, 13(Suppl 1), S257–S260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mohr, C., Blanke, O., & Brugger, P. (2006). Perceptual aberrations impair mental own-body transformations. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120(3), 528–534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Moll, H., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2011). How does it look? Level 2 perspective-taking at 36 months of age. Child Development, 82(2), 661–673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Parsons, L. M. (1987). Imagined spatial transformation of one’s body. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116(2), 172–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petkova, V. I., Bjornsdotter, M., Gentile, G., Jonsson, T., Li, T. Q., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2011). From part- to whole-body ownership in the multisensory brain. Current Biology, 21(13), 1118–1122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1157–1165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rieser, J. J., Garing, A. E., & Young, M. F. (1994). Imagery, action, and young children’s spatial orientation: it’s not being there that counts, it’s what one has in mind. Child Development, 65(5), 1262–1278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rieser, J. J., Guth, D. A., & Hill, E. W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception, 15(2), 173–188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shinder, M. E., & Taube, J. S. (2010). Differentiating ascending vestibular pathways to the cortex involved in spatial cognition. Journal of Vestibular Research, 20(1), 3–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sirigu, A., & Duhamel, J. R. (2001). Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(7), 910–919.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Metz, U. (2007). Now I see it but you don’t: 14-month-olds can represent another person’s visual perspective. Developmental Science, 10(2), 199–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tadi, T., Overney, L. S., & Blanke, O. (2009). Three sequential brain activations encode mental transformations of upright and inverted human bodies: a high resolution evoked potential study. Neuroscience, 159(4), 1316–1325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tversky, B., & Hard, B. M. (2009). Embodied and disembodied cognition: spatial perspective-taking. Cognition, 110(1), 124–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. van Elk, M., & Blanke, O. (2012). Balancing bistable perception during self-motion. Experimental Brain Research, 222(3), 219–228.Google Scholar
  49. Viswanathan, S., Fritz, C., & Grafton, S. T. (2012). Telling the right hand from the left hand: multisensory integration, not motor imagery, solves the problem. Psychological Science, 23(6), 598–607.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Vogeley, K., May, M., Ritzl, A., Falkai, P., Zilles, K., & Fink, G. R. (2004). Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(5), 817–827.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wraga, M. (2003). Thinking outside the body: an advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 993–1005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wraga, M., Shephard, J. M., Church, J. A., Inati, S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Imagined rotations of self versus objects: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 43(9), 1351–1361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zacks, J. M., & Michelon, P. (2005). Transformations of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(2), 96–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Brain Mind InstituteÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  4. 4.Center for NeuroprostheticsÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations