Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of task rules on distracter processing: automatic categorization of irrelevant stimuli

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of the study was to investigate whether task rules are automatically applied to irrelevant distracters. In three experiments, subjects categorized target words which were superimposed on distracter pictures. The categorization rule was arbitrary and the distracters were not relevant at any point during the experiment. We found congruency effects for distracters that belonged to the task-relevant categories, but were never presented as target words. Responses were faster when target and distracter belonged to the same category, i.e., were mapped to the same response, than when they were mapped to different responses. Since the distracters were never responded to in the course of the experiment, interference caused by retrieval of S-R episodes cannot explain the results. Instead, we propose that even arbitrary categorization rules are applied to all suitable stimuli, including distracters. Results are taken as evidence that a currently relevant task rule enhances processing of target-related information thereby increasing interference by task related, but currently irrelevant information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that Dreisbach and Haider (2009) used distracters that were either semantically related (comparable to the target-related distracters used here) or semantically unrelated to the task (but spatially compatible or incompatible with the target) while in our study, all distracters were semantically related to the task (i.e., could be categorized according to the rule) but only some distracters were related to the targets, i.e. also appeared as target words.

References

  • Ach, N. (2006). On volition (T.Herz, Trans.). (Original work published 1910) Retrieved March 28, 2011, from Univerity of Konstanz, Cognitive Psychology Web site: http://www.uni-konstanz.de/kogpsych/ach.htm.

  • Cohen-Kdoshay, O., & Meiran, N. (2007). The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(8), 1140–1154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Kdoshay, O., & Meiran, N. (2009). The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions. Experimental Psychology, 56(2), 128–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2008). That’s what task sets are for: shielding against irrelevant information. Psychological Research, 72, 355–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2009). How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 477–486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dreisbach, G., & Wenke, D. (2011). The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1540–1546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8(12), 1784–1790.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frings, C., Möller, B., & Rothermund, K. (2011). The croaking frog: retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated (submitted).

  • Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(1), 13–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5(1), 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex—automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247–273). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentzsch, I., & Dudschig, C. (2009). Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of posterror slowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(2), 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Y., & Meiran, N. (2010). The reaction-time task-rule congruency effect is not affected by working memory load: further support for the activated long-term memory hypothesis. Psychological Research, 74, 388–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesel, A., Wendt, M., & Peters, A. (2007). Task switching: on the origin of response congruency effects. Psychological Research, 71(2), 117–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klauer, K. C., Eder, A. B., Greenwald, A. G., & Abrams, R. L. (2007). Priming of semantic classifications by novel subliminal prime words. Consciousness and Cognition, 16(1), 63–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunde, W., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition, 88, 223–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(1), 137–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., Kessler, Y., & Adi-Japha, E. (2008). Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research, 72, 473–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition, 80(3), 215–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Opstal, F. V., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: an orienting account. Cognition, 111(2), 275–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J., & McAuliffe, J. (2002). Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(8), 1361–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, R. W., Folk, C. L., & McLean, J. P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 63(2), 298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynvoet, B., Gevers, W., & Caessens, B. (2005). Unconscious primes activate motor codes through semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 991–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. C., & Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(4), 373–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13(1), 89–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, W. W. (2001). Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminancy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bussche, E., Notebaert, K., & Reynvoet, B. (2009). Masked primes can be genuinely semantically processed: a picture prime study. Experimental Psychology, 56(5), 295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Opstal, F., de Lange, F. P., & Dehaene, S. (2011). Rapid parallel semantic processing of numbers without awareness. Cognition, 120(1), 136–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Osman, M., & Verguts, T. (2010). Unconscious task application. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 999–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2008). The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks. Psychological Research, 72, 425–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenke, D., Gaschler, R., & Nattkemper, D. (2007). Instruction-induced feature binding. Psychological Research, 71(1), 92–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yehene, E., Meiran, N., & Soroker, N. (2005). Task alternation cost without task alternation: measuring intentionality. Neuropsychologia, 43(13), 1858–1869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Barbara Kamola, Julia Fritz, Veronika Weiß and Lisa Raith for data collection. This research was sponsored by a grant to the second author from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG: DR 392/5-2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany

    Renate Reisenauer & Gesine Dreisbach

Authors
  1. Renate Reisenauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gesine Dreisbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renate Reisenauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reisenauer, R., Dreisbach, G. The impact of task rules on distracter processing: automatic categorization of irrelevant stimuli. Psychological Research 77, 128–138 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0413-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-012-0413-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation