Psychological Research

, Volume 77, Issue 2, pp 155–166 | Cite as

The effects of an unexpected spider stimulus on skin conductance responses and eye movements: an inattentional blindness study

  • Julian Wiemer
  • Antje B. M. Gerdes
  • Paul Pauli
Original Article


Are spiders evolutionarily relevant threat cues that capture attention automatically and preattentively—also in non-fearful persons? Previous studies concerning this question did not examine responses to unexpected spider stimuli, although this is an ecologically valid situation. Therefore, we conducted an inattentional blindness (IB) experiment. While unselected participants (N = 120) were focusing their attention on a visual discrimination task, suddenly a spider or a flower image appeared. The rates of reported detection were not enhanced for spider images, and fear of spiders had no moderating influence on IB rates. However, spider pictures in general elicited greater skin conductance responses than flower pictures, and this difference was also observed for pictures that were not reported afterward. Moreover, eye movement data revealed that the spider stimulus was initially fixated more often than the flower stimulus. In sum, our findings imply that enhanced reactions to unexpected spider images are independent of fear level and include early engagement processes. Awareness of a spider picture does not seem to be a prerequisite for elevated arousal.


Attentional Bias Stimulus Type Skin Conductance Response Inattentional Blindness Critical Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank Roswitha Gerhard and Silja Menken for their help. This work was supported by the DFG (German Research Foundation), Research Group ‘Emotion and Behavior’ (FOR 605) and Collaborative Research Center “fear, anxiety, anxiety disorders (SFB-TRR 58, project B01)”.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. We have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review our data if requested.


  1. Alpers, G. W., Gerdes, A. B. M., Lagarie, B., Tabbert, K., Vaitl, D., & Stark, R. (2009). Attention and amygdala activity: An fMRI study with spider pictures in spider phobia. Journal of Neural Transmission, 116, 747–757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batty, M. J., Cave, K. R., & Pauli, P. (2005). Abstract stimuli associated with threat through conditioning cannot be detected preattentively. Emotion, 5, 418–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beanland, V., & Pammer, K. (2010). Looking without seeing or seeing without looking? Eye movements in sustained inattentional blindness. Vision Research, 50, 977–988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., Adolphs, R., Rockland, C., & Damasio, A. R. (1995). Double dissociation of conditioning and declarative knowledge relative to the amygdala and hippocampus in humans. Science, 269, 1115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breska, A., Maoz, K., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2011). Interstimulus intervals for skin conductance response measurement. Psychophysiology, 48, 437–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Büchel, C., Morris, J., Dolan, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (1998). Brain systems mediating aversive conditioning: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 20, 947–957.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlsson, K., Petersson, K. M., Lundqvist, D., Karlsson, A., Ingvar, M., & Öhman, A. (2004). Fear and the amygdala: Manipulation of awareness generates differential cerebral responses to phobic and fear-relevant (but non-feared) stimuli. Emotion, 4, 340–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavanagh, K., & Davey, G. C. L. (2000). UCS expectancy biases in spider phobics: Underestimation of aversive consequences following fear-irrelevant stimuli. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 641–651.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerdes, A. B. M., Alpers, G. W., & Pauli, P. (2008). When spiders appear suddenly: Spider-phobic patients are distracted by task-irrelevant spiders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 174–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerdes, A. B. M., Pauli, P., & Alpers, G. W. (2009). Toward and away from spiders: Eye-movements in spider-fearful participants. Journal of Neural Transmission, 116, 725–733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamm, A. O., & Weike, A. I. (2005). The neuropsychology of fear learning and fear regulation. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57, 5–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 284–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46, 1762–1776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klucken, T., Kagerer, S., Schweckendiek, J., Tabbert, K., Vaitl, D., & Stark, R. (2009). Neural, electrodermal and behavioral response patterns in contingency aware and unaware subjects during a picture–picture conditioning paradigm. Neuroscience, 158, 721–731.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolassa, I.-T., Buchmann, A., Lauche, R., Kolassa, S., Partchev, I., Miltner, W., et al. (2007). Spider phobics more easily see a spider in morphed schematic pictures. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., van Damme, S., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004a). Does imminent threat capture and hold attention? Emotion, 4, 312–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koster, E. H. W., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004b). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 1183–1192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, H., & Telch, M. J. (2008). Attentional biases in social anxiety: An investigation using the inattentional blindness paradigm. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 819–835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lipp, O. V., & Derakshan, N. (2005). Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion, 5, 365–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lipp, O. V., & Waters, A. M. (2007). When danger lurks in the background: Attentional capture by animal fear-relevant distractors is specific and selectively enhanced by animal fear. Emotion, 7, 192–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1985). Selective processing of threat cues in anxiety states. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 563–569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayer, B., Muris, P., Vogel, L., Nojoredjo, I., & Merckelbach, H. (2006). Fear-relevant change detection in spider-fearful and non-fearful participants. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 20, 510–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miltner, W. H. R., Krieschel, S., Hecht, H., Trippe, R., & Weiss, T. (2004). Eye movements and behavioral responses to threatening and nonthreatening stimuli during visual search in phobic and nonphobic subjects. Emotion, 4, 323–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nummenmaa, L., Hyönä, J., & Calvo, M. G. (2006). Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures. Emotion, 6, 257–268.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Öhman, A., Carlsson, K., Lundqvist, D., & Ingvar, M. (2007). On the unconscious subcortical origin of human fear. Physiology & Behavior, 92, 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 130, 466–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Öhman, A., & Soares, J. J. F. (1994). “Unconscious anxiety”: Phobic responses to masked stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 231–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pessoa, L., Japee, S., Sturman, D., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2006). Target visibility and visual awareness modulate amygdala responses to fearful faces. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 366–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pessoa, L., Padmala, S., & Morland, T. (2005). Fate of unattended fearful faces in the amygdala is determined by both attentional resources and cognitive modulation. Neuroimage, 28, 249–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phaf, R. H., & Kan, K. J. (2007). The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38(2), 184–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pischek-Simpson, L. K., Boschen, M. J., Neumann, D. L., & Waters, A. M. (2009). The development of an attentional bias for angry faces following Pavlovian fear conditioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 322–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Recio, G., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Effects of inter-stimulus interval on skin conductance responses and event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task. Biological Psychology, 80, 246–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rinck, M., Bundschuh, S., Englert, S., Müller, A., Wissmann, J., Ellwart, T., et al. (2002). Reliabilität und Validität dreier Instrumente zur Messung von Angst vor Spinnen. Diagnostica, 48, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rinck, M., Reinecke, A., Ellwart, T., Heuer, K., & Becker, E. S. (2005). Speeded detection and increased distraction in fear of spiders: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 235–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Straube, T., Mentzel, H. J., & Miltner, W. H. (2006). Neural mechanisms of automatic and direct processing of phobogenic stimuli in specific phobia. Biological Psychiatry, 59, 162–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Szczepanowski, R., & Pessoa, L. (2007). Fear perception: Can objective and subjective awareness measures be dissociated? Journal of Vision, 7, 10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Usunoff, K. G., Schmitt, O., Itzev, D. E., Rolfs, A., & Wree, A. (2007). Efferent connections of the parabigeminal nucleus to the amygdala and the superior colliculus in the rat: A double-labeling fluorescent retrograde tracing study. Brain Research, 1133, 87–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Várkuti, B., & Ambach, W. (2008). Bootstrapping und andere Standardisierungsverfahren: Was ist wann am besten?
  47. Watts, F. N., McKenna, F. P., Sharrock, R., & Trezise, L. (1986). Colour naming of phobia-related words. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 97–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wieser, M. J., Pauli, P., & Mühlberger, A. (2009). Probing the attentional control theory in social anxiety: An emotional saccade task. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wolfe, J. M. (1999). Inattentional amnesia. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wurtz, R. H., & Goldberg, M. E. (1971). Superior colliculus cell responses related to eye movements in awake monkeys. Science, 171, 82–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yiend, J., & Mathews, A. (2001). Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 665–681.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian Wiemer
    • 1
  • Antje B. M. Gerdes
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul Pauli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy)University of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations