Setting sights higher: category-level attentional set modulates sustained inattentional blindness
- 485 Downloads
Previous research has shown that inattentional blindness is modulated by how people tune their “attentional set”: the more featurally similar the unexpected object is to what people are trying to attend, the more likely it is that they will notice it. The experiments in this paper show that people can also establish attentional sets based on semantic categories, and that these high-level attentional sets modulate sustained inattentional blindness. In “Experiment 1”, participants tracked four moving numbers and ignored four moving letters or vice versa, and the unexpected object was either a capital letter ‘E’ or its reverse, a block-like number ‘3’. Despite their featural similarity, participants were more likely to notice the unexpected object belonging to the same category as the tracked objects. “Experiment 2” replicated this effect in conditions where the unexpected object possessed a unique luminance and was less likely simply to be confused with other display items.
KeywordsSemantic Category Critical Trial Conscious Perception Inattentional Blindness Display Item
This research was supported in part by NIH Grant # 1 F32 MH066572-O1A1 to the author. Thanks to Brian Scholl for his programming expertise, as well as to Erin Carey, Adam Grant, Katie Rattray, Debby Rin, Jason Tajima, and David Widders for help in collecting data.
- Comtois, R. (2002). VisionShell PPC. [Software libraries]. Cambridge, MA: author.Google Scholar
- Hurt, H. H., Ouellet, J. V., & Thom, D. R. (1981). Motorcycle accident cause factors and identification of countermeasures. (DOT HS 805 862). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.Google Scholar
- Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2002). Attention. In H. Pashler & S. Yantis (Eds.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology: Volume 1. Sensation & Perception (3rd ed. ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Most, S.B., Simons, D.J., Scholl, B.J., & Chabris, C.F. (2000). Sustained inattentional blindness: The role of location in the detection of unexpected dynamic events. Psyche, 6(14), http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/psyche-6-14-most.html.
- Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar