Skip to main content

Sequential congruency effects: disentangling priming and conflict adaptation

Psychological Research volume 76, pages 591–600 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Responding to the color of a word is slower and less accurate if the word refers to a different color (incongruent condition) than if it refers to the same color (congruent condition). This phenomenon, known as the Stroop effect, is modulated by sequential effects: it is bigger when the current trial is preceded by a congruent condition than by an incongruent one in the previous trial. Whether this phenomenon is due to priming mechanisms or to cognitive control is still debated. To disentangle the contribution of priming with respect to conflict adaptation mechanisms in determining sequential effects, two experiments were designed here with a four-alternative forced choice (4-AFC) Stroop task: in the first one only trials with complete alternations of features were used, while in the second experiment all possible types of repetitions were presented. Both response times (RTs) and errors were evaluated. Conflict adaptation effects on RTs were limited to congruent trials and were exclusively due to priming: they disappeared in the priming-free experiment and, in the second experiment, they occurred in sequences with feature repetitions but not in complete alternation sequences. Error results, instead, support the presence of conflict adaptation effects in incongruent trials. In priming-free sequences (Experiment 1 and complete alternation sequences of Experiment 2) with incongruent previous trials there was no error Stroop effect, while this effect was significant with congruent previous trials. These results indicate that cognitive control may modulate performance above and beyond priming effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Aron, A. R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist, 13(3), 214–228.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M., Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature, 402(6758), 179–181.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Besner, D. (2001). On a variant of Stroop’s paradigm: Which cognitions press your buttons? Memory and Cognition, 29, 903–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. T. (1965). The effect of errors on reaction time in a serial reaction task. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan (unpublished).

  • De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutzi, I. B., & Hommel, B. (2009). The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychological Research, 73, 425–435.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1, 106–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floden, D., Vallesi, A., & Stuss, D. T. (2011). Task context and frontal lobe activation in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(4), 867–879.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(5), 1368–1384.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136, 189–202.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68(1), 1–17.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara, S. (1962). Tests for Colour-blindness. Tokyo: Kanehara Shuppan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303(5660), 1023–1026.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253–270.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri, F. A., Buckley, M. J., & Tanaka, K. (2007). Mnemonic function of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in conflict-induced behavioral adjustment. Science, 318(5852), 987–990.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience, 6(5), 450–452.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J. F., Posthuma, D., Polderman, T. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. (2006). Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Memory & Cognition, 34(6), 1260–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., & Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(1), 112–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notebaert, W., & Soetens, E. (2003). The influence of irrelevant stimulus changes on stimulus and response repetition effects. Acta Psychology (Amst), 112(2), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task—evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65(3), 170–184.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2007). Dissociating conflict adaptation from feature integration: a multiple regression approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(5), 1256–1260.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, J. V., Pardo, P. J., Janer, K. W., & Raichle, M. E. (1990). The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 87(1), 256–259.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schroter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(6), 1345–1363.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P., & Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 37(4), 591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallesi, A., & Umiltà, C. A. (2009). Decay of stimulus spatial code in horizontal and vertical Simon tasks. Journal of General Psychology, 136(4), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R., & Moore, K. (2005). Adjustments of cognitive control in younger and older adults. Cortex, 41(4), 570–581.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58(4), 705–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by an ESCoP Early Career Stimulus award to OP. The authors thank Bernhard Hommel and Peter Wühr for their useful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA-ISAS), Via Bonomea 265, 34136, Trieste, Italy

    Olga Puccioni & Antonino Vallesi

Authors
  1. Olga Puccioni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonino Vallesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Puccioni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puccioni, O., Vallesi, A. Sequential congruency effects: disentangling priming and conflict adaptation. Psychological Research 76, 591–600 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0360-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0360-5

Keywords

  • Congruency Effect
  • Negative Priming
  • Stroop Task
  • Incongruent Trial
  • Stroop Effect