Advertisement

Psychological Research

, Volume 74, Issue 5, pp 499–512 | Cite as

Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance

  • Robert LangnerEmail author
  • Klaus Willmes
  • Anjan Chatterjee
  • Simon B. Eickhoff
  • Walter Sturm
Original Article

Abstract

The efficiency of cognition is modulated by energetic factors like effort, fatigue or circadian variation, which affect even the most basic cognitive operations. For instance, speeded detection in simple reaction-time (SRT) tasks usually slows down over time. The literature suggests that either mindlessness due to routinization or mental fatigue due to attentional resource depletion might underlie this decrement. We tested these assumptions in three 25-min visual SRT tasks using easy-to-detect high-intensity and hard-to-detect low-intensity stimuli presented in both blocked and mixed fashion. Mindlessness theory predicts that less monotonous stimulation (i.e. the mixed presentation) would mitigate the time-related decrement for high- and low-intensity stimuli alike, whereas resource-depletion theory predicts opposite effects of mixed presentation on high- versus low-intensity stimuli. Indeed, stimulus intensity and presentation mode cross-interacted significantly, indicating that the performance decline was steeper for high-intensity stimuli but less steep for low-intensity stimuli during mixed compared to blocked presentation, respectively. These results strongly suggest that the time-related efficiency decrement during prolonged SRT performance is related to accumulating mental fatigue. A conjecture is put forward that explains both resource depletion and mindlessness from the perspective of self-regulation. Our study underscores the need to incorporate energetic factors into models of cognition to facilitate their translation into real-world applications.

Keywords

Presentation Mode Mental Fatigue Task Engagement Mindlessness Theory Vigilance Decrement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Robert Langner was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, IRTG 1328). We thank Anita Koschmieder for help with data collection and Jan Lonnemann for technical assistance. We are grateful to William Helton, Bob Hockey, Michael Steinborn, Thomas Fischer and Susanne Leiberg for helpful comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Aglioti, S., Smania, N., Barbieri, C., & Corbetta, M. (1997). Influence of stimulus salience and attentional demands on visual search patterns in hemispatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 34, 388–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Banich, M. T., Burgess, G. C., Depue, B. E., Ruzic, L., Bidwell, L. C., et al. (2009). The neural basis of sustained and transient attentional control in young adults with ADHD. Neuropsychologia, 47, 3095–3104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R. A., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., et al. (2000). Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional ‘set’: evidence from fMRI. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 1–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buck, L. (1966). Reaction time as a measure of perceptual vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 291–304.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, D. R., & Parasuraman, R. (1982). The Psychology of Vigilance. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dockree, P. M., Kelly, S. P., Robertson, I. H., Roche, R. A., Reilly, R. B., & Foxe, J. J. (2005). Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behavior: A high-density electrical mapping study. NeuroImage, 27, 587–601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dockree, P. M., Kelly, S. P., Roche, R. A., Hogan, M. J., Reilly, R. B., & Robertson, I. H. (2004). Behavioural and physiological impairments of sustained attention after traumatic brain injury. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 403–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2008). That’s what task sets are for: shielding against irrelevant information. Psychological Research, 72, 355–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Eysenck, M. W. (1982). Attention and Arousal: Cognition and Performance. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Fischer, T., Langner, R., Birbaumer, N., & Brocke, B. (2008). Arousal and attention: Self-chosen stimulation optimizes cortical excitability and minimizes compensatory effort. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1443–1453.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Frith, C. D., & Done, D. J. (1986). Routes to action in reaction time tasks. Psychological Research, 48, 169–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Goschke, T., & Dreisbach, G. (2008). Conflict-triggered goal shielding: response conflicts attenuate background monitoring for prospective memory cues. Psychological Science, 19, 25–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gottsdanker, R. (1975). The attaining and maintaining of preparation. In P. M. A. Rabbit & S. Dornic (Eds.), Attention and Performance V (pp. 33–49). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Grier, R. A., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Matthews, G., Galinsky, T. L., Szalma, J. L., et al. (2003). The vigilance decrement reflects limitations in effortful attention not mindlessness. Human Factors, 45, 349–359.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustafson, R. (1986). Effect of small doses of alcohol and signal intensity on simple auditory reaction time in a monotonous test situation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 539–543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hancock, P. A. (1987). Arousal theory, stress and performance: Problems of incorporating energetic aspects of behavior into human-machine systems function. In L. S. Mark, J. S. Warm, & R. L. Huston (Eds.), Ergonomics and Human Factors: Recent Research (pp. 170–179). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Hancock, P. A., & Desmond, P. A. (Eds.). (2001). Stress, Workload, and Fatigue. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Hancock, P. A., & Warm, J. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519–537.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Helton, W. S., Hollander, T. D., Warm, J. S., Matthews, G., Dember, W. N., et al. (2005). Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 249–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Helton, W. S., & Warm, J. S. (2008). Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance. Acta Psychologica, 129, 18–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson, L., & Dittrich, W. H. (1998). Preparing to react in the absence of uncertainty: I. New perspectives on simple reaction time. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 531–554.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hockey, G. R. J. (1986). A state control theory of adaptation to stress and individual differences in stress management. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Energetics and Human Information Processing (pp. 285–298). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  26. Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45, 73–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hockey, G. R. J., Coles, M. G. H., & Gaillard, A. W. K. (1986). Energetical issues in research on human information processing. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Energetics and Human Information Processing (pp. 3–21). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  28. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Langner, R., Steinborn, M. B., Chatterjee, A., Sturm, W., & Willmes, K. (2010). Mental fatigue and temporal preparation in simple reaction-time performance. Acta Psychologica, 133, 64–72.Google Scholar
  30. Lim, J., & Dinges, D. F. (2008). Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1129, 305–322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lisper, H. O., & Ericsson, S. (1973). Effects of signal frequency on increase in reaction time in a 10-minute auditory monitoring task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 316–319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lisper, H. O., Kjellberg, A., & Melin, L. (1972). Effects of signal intensity on increase of reaction time on an auditory monitoring task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 439–444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lisper, H. O., Melin, L., Sjödén, P. O., & Fagerström, K. O. (1977). Temporal uncertainty of auditory signals in a monitoring task: Effects of inter-signal interval length and regularity on increase in reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 41, 183–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lisper, H. O., & Törnros, J. (1974). Effects of inter-signal interval regularity on increase in reaction time in a one hour auditory monitoring task. Acta Psychologica, 38, 455–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lorist, M. M., Klein, M., Nieuwenhuis, S., De Jong, R., Mulder, G., & Meijman, T. F. (2000). Mental fatigue and task control: planning and preparation. Psychophysiology, 37, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica, 94, 145–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manly, T., Heutink, J., Davison, B., Gaynord, B., Greenfield, E., Parr, A., et al. (2004). An electronic knot in the handkerchief: ‘Content free cueing’ and the maintenance of attentive control. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14, 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manly, T., Robertson, I. H., Galloway, M., & Hawkins, K. (1999). The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia, 37, 661–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L. A., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., et al. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion, 2, 315–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., Westerman, S. J., & Stammers, R. B. (2000). Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Matthews, G., & Desmond, P. A. (2002). Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 659–686.Google Scholar
  42. Matthews, G., Emo, A. K., & Funke, G. J. (2005). A short version of the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire. Poster presented at the 12th Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Adelaide, Australia. Google Scholar
  43. Miller, J. O., & Ulrich, R. (2003). Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: a parallel grains model. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 101–151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mulder, G. (1986). The concept and measurement of mental effort. In G. R. J. Hockey, A. W. K. Gaillard, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Energetics and Human Information Processing (pp. 175–198). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  45. Müller, B., & Basler, H. D. (1993). Kurzfragebogen zur aktuellen Beanspruchung (KAB). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  46. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Näätänen, R. (1972). Time uncertainty and occurrence uncertainty of the stimulus in a simple reaction time task. Acta Psychologica, 36, 492–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nissen, M. J. (1977). Stimulus intensity and information processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 338–352.Google Scholar
  49. Nothdurft, H.-C. (2006). Salience and target selection in visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 514–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nuechterlein, K. H., Parasuraman, R., & Jiang, Q. (1983). Visual sustained attention: Image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time. Science, 220, 327–329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ollman, R. T., & Billington, M. J. (1972). The deadline model for simple reaction times. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 311–336.Google Scholar
  53. Parasuraman, R. (1979). Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. Science, 205, 924–927.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pattyn, N., Neyt, X., Henderickx, D., & Soetens, E. (2008). Psychophysiological investigation of vigilance decrement: Boredom or cognitive fatigue? Physiology and Behavior, 93, 369–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Pfaff, D. W. (2006). Brain Arousal and Information Theory: Neural and Genetic Mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric Explorations of Mind. Englewood Hights, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Posner, M. I., Cohen, Y., Choate, L. S., Hockey, G. R. J., & Maylor, E. (1984). Sustained concentration: Passive filtering or active orienting. In S. Kornblum & J. Requin (Eds.), Preparatory States and Processes (pp. 49–65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Reynolds, J. H., Pasternak, T., & Desimone, R. (2000). Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron, 26, 703–714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). “Oops!”: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rogosa, D. R. (1995). Myths and methods: Myths about longitudinal research plus supplemental questions. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The Analysis of Change (pp. 3–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  61. Rogosa, D. R., & Willett, J. B. (1985). Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika, 50, 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sanders, A. F. (1977). Structural and functional aspects of the reaction process. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  63. Sanders, A. F. (1983). Towards a model of stress and human performance. Acta Psychologica, 53, 61–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sanders, A. F., Wijnen, J. L., & van Arkel, A. E. (1982). An additive factor analysis of the effects of sleep loss on reaction processes. Acta Psychologica, 51, 41–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sarter, M., Gehring, W. J., & Kozak, R. (2006). More attention must be paid: the neurobiology of attentional effort. Brain Research Reviews, 51, 145–160.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Scerbo, M. (1998). What’s so boring about vigilance? In R. B. Hoffman, M. F. Sherrick, & J. S. Warm (Eds.), Viewing Psychology as a Whole: The Integrative Science of William N. Dember (pp. 145–166). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. See, J. E., Howe, S. R., Warm, J. S., & Dember, W. N. (1995). A meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 230–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smallwood, J., Davies, J. B., Heim, D., Finnigan, F., Sudberry, M., O’Conner, R., et al. (2004). Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 657–690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Smit, A. S., Eling, P. A. T. M., & Coenen, A. M. L. (2004). Mental effort causes vigilance decrease due to resource depletion. Acta Psychologica, 115, 35–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith, P. L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. Psychological Review, 102, 567–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sturm, W., & Willmes, K. (2001). On the functional neuroanatomy of intrinsic and phasic alertness. NeuroImage, 14, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Szalma, J. L., Hancock, P. A., Dember, W. N., & Warm, J. S. (2006). Training for vigilance: The effect of knowledge of results format and dispositional optimism and pessimism on performance and stress. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 115–135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Szalma, J. L., Warm, J. S., Matthews, G., Dember, W. N., Wiler, E. M., Meier, A., et al. (2004). Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention. Human Factors, 46, 219–233.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Temple, J. G., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., Jones, K. S., LaGrange, C. M., & Matthews, G. (2000). The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Human Factors, 42, 183–194.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Turatto, M., & Galfano, G. (2000). Color, form and luminance capture attention in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1639–1643.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Van den Berg, J., & Neely, G. (2006). Performance on a simple reaction time task while sleep deprived. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 102, 589–599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Van der Linden, D., Frese, M., & Meijman, T. F. (2003). Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: Effects on perseveration and planning. Acta Psychologica, 113, 45–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Van der Molen, M. W. (1996). Energetics and the reaction process: Running threads through experimental psychology. In O. Neumann & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Action, Vol. 3: Attention (pp. 229–276). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  81. Van Dongen, H. P. A., Maislin, G., Mullington, J. M., & Dinges, D. F. (2003). The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose–response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep, 26, 117–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Van Zomeren, A. H., & Brouwer, W. H. (1994). Clinical Neuropsychology of Attention. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Walker, A. D., Muth, E. R., Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Moore, D., & Pilcher, J. J. (2009). The effects of 28 hours of sleep deprivation on respiratory sinus arrhythmia during tasks with low and high controlled attention demands. Psychophysiology, 46, 217–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Warm, J. S., Parasuraman, R., & Matthews, G. (2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50, 433–441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Weissman, D. H., Roberts, K. C., Visscher, K. M., & Woldorff, M. G. (2006). The neural basis of momentary lapses in attention. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 971–978.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Wesensten, N. J., Belenky, G., Kautz, M. A., Thorne, D. R., Reichardt, R. M., & Balkin, T. J. (2002). Maintaining alertness and performance during sleep deprivation: modafinil versus caffeine. Psychopharmacology, 159, 238–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. West, R. (2001). The transient nature of executive control processes in younger and older adults. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wright, R. A., Junious, T. R., Neal, C., Avello, A., Graham, C., et al. (2007). Mental fatigue influence on effort-related cardiovascular response: Difficulty effects and extension across cognitive performance domains. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wright, R. A., Stewart, C. C., & Barnett, B. R. (2008). Mental fatigue influence on effort-related cardiovascular response: Extension across the regulatory (inhibitory)/non-regulatory performance dimension. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 69, 127–133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Wyatt, J. K., Ritz-De Cecco, A., Czeisler, C. A., & Dijk, D. J. (1999). Circadian temperature and melatonin rhythms, sleep, and neurobehavioral function in humans living on a 20-h day. American Journal of Physiology, 277, R1152–R1163.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Langner
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
    Email author
  • Klaus Willmes
    • 1
  • Anjan Chatterjee
    • 3
  • Simon B. Eickhoff
    • 2
    • 4
  • Walter Sturm
    • 1
  1. 1.Neuropsychology Section, Department of NeurologyRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and PsychotherapyRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  3. 3.Department of Neurology, Center for Cognitive NeuroscienceUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Research Centre JülichInstitute of Neurosciences and MedicineJülichGermany
  5. 5.LFG Neuropsychologie, Neurologische KlinikUniversitätsklinikum AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations