Psychological Research PRPF

, Volume 74, Issue 4, pp 429–435 | Cite as

Sex differences in parking are affected by biological and social factors

  • Claudia C. Wolf
  • Sebastian Ocklenburg
  • Beyza Ören
  • Cordula Becker
  • Andrea Hofstätter
  • Christa Bös
  • Markus Popken
  • Truls Thorstensen
  • Onur Güntürkün
Original Article

Abstract

The stereotype of women’s limited parking skills is deeply anchored in modern culture. Although laboratory tests prove men’s average superiority in visuospatial tasks and parking requires complex, spatial skills, underlying mechanisms remain unexplored. Here, we investigated performance of beginners (nine women, eight men) and more experienced drivers (21 women, 27 men) at different parking manoeuvres. Furthermore, subjects conducted the mental rotation test and self-assessed their parking skills. We show that men park more accurately and especially faster than women. Performance is related to mental rotation skills and self-assessment in beginners, but only to self-assessment in more experienced drivers. We assume that, due to differential feedback, self-assessment incrementally replaces the controlling influence of mental rotation, as parking is trained with increasing experience. Results suggest that sex differences in spatial cognition persist in real-life situations, but that socio-psychological factors modulate the biological causes of sex differences.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MPG 11694 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MPG 81362 kb)

References

  1. Bandura, A. (2003). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  2. Bergdahl, J. (2005). Sex differences in attitudes towards driving: a survey. Social Science Journal, 42, 595–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bethell-Fox, C. E., & Shepard, R. N. (1988). Mental rotation: effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 12–23.Google Scholar
  4. Bloedel, R. J., Ebner, T. J., & Wise, S. P. (1996). The acquisition of motor behavior in vertebrates. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brizendine, L. (2006). The female brain. New York: Morgan Road Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bymes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chipman, K., & Kimura, D. (1998). An investigation of sex differences on incidental memory for verbal and pictorial material. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa, R. M. (2007). Plastic corticostriatal circuits for action learning: what’s dopamine got to do with it? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104, 172–191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crossley, M., D’Arcy, C., & Rawson, S. B. (1997). Letter and category fluency in community-dwelling Canadian seniors: a comparison of normal participants with those with dementia of the Alzheimer vascular type. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 52–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Ambrosio, L. A., Donorfio, L. K., Coughlin, J. F., Mohyde, M., & Meyer, J. (2008). Gender differences in self-regulation patterns and attitudes toward driving among older adults. Journal of Women and Aging, 20, 265–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fleishman, E. A., & Rich, S. (1963). Role of kinesthetic and spatial-visual abilities in perceptual-motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 6–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Galea, L. A. M., & Kimura, D. (1993). Sex differences in route-learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gentile, B., Grabe, S., Dolan-Pascoe, B., Twenge, J. M., Wells, B. E., & Maitino, A. (2009). Gender differences in domain-specific self-esteem: a meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 13, 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halpern, D. F. (1996). Public policy implications of sex differences in cognitive abilities. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 561–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Halpern, D. F., & Tan, U. (2001). Stereotypes and steroids: using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences. Brain and Cognition, 45, 392–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hausmann, M., Schoofs, D., Rosenthal, H. E. S., & Jordan, K. (2009). Interactive effects of sex hormones and gender stereotypes on cognitive sex differences—a psychobiosocial approach. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 389–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hines, M. (1990). Gonadal hormones and human cognitive development. In J. Balthazart (Ed.), Hormones, brain and behaviour in vertebrates 1 (pp. 51–63). Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
  19. Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kimura, D. (2002). Sex hormones influence human cognitive pattern. Neuro Endocrinology Letters, 23, 67–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive Ethology: a new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 317–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kramer, J. H., Delis, D. C., & Daniel, M. (1988). Sex differences in verbal learning. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 907–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lehrl, S. (1977). Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest MWT-B. Straube: Erlangen.Google Scholar
  24. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterisation of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lohmann, D. F., & Nichols, P. D. (1990). Training spatial abilities: effects of practice on rotation and synthesis tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Masters, M. S., & Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics, 23, 337–341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mehl, M. R., Vazire, S., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men? Science, 317, 82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nudo, R. J. (2008). Neurophysiology of motor skill learning. In J. H. Byrne (Ed.), Learning and memory. A comprehensive reference vol. 3: memory systems (pp. 403–421). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.Google Scholar
  30. Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg & Kuse mental rotation test: different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28, 39–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pezaris, E., & Casey, M. B. (1991). Girls who use “masculine” problem-solving strategies on a spatial task: proposed genetic and environmental factors. Brain and Cognition, 17, 1–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Roosenbloom, T., Ben-Eliyahu, A., Nemrodov, D., Biegel, A., & Perlman, A. (2009). Committing driving violations: an observational study comparing city, town, and village. Journal of Safety Research, 40, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schultz, K. (1991). The contribution of solution strategy to spatial performance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 474–491.Google Scholar
  34. Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations: a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Vidal, M., Lehman, A., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2009). A multisensory approach to spatial updating: the case of mental rotations. Experimental Brain Research, 197, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wanzel, K. R., Hamstra, S. J., Caminiti, M. F., Anastakis, D. J., Grober, E. D., & Reznick, R. K. (2003). Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance. Surgery, 134, 750–757.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Williams, A. F. (2003). Teenage drivers: patterns of risk. Journal of Safety Research, 34, 5–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yeung, N. C., & von Hippel, C. (2008). Stereotype threat increases the likelihood that female drivers in a simulator run over jaywalkers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40, 667–674.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhai, S., Kong, J., & Ren, X. (2004). Speed-accuracy trade-off in Fitts’ law tasks–on the equivalency of actual and nominal pointing precision. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 61, 823–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia C. Wolf
    • 1
  • Sebastian Ocklenburg
    • 1
  • Beyza Ören
    • 1
  • Cordula Becker
    • 1
  • Andrea Hofstätter
    • 2
  • Christa Bös
    • 2
  • Markus Popken
    • 3
  • Truls Thorstensen
    • 2
  • Onur Güntürkün
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biopsychology, Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive NeuroscienceRuhr-University BochumBochumGermany
  2. 2.EFS Unternehmensberatung GesmbHViennaAustria
  3. 3.Audi AG, Auto-Union-StraßeIngolstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations