Skip to main content
Log in

The configuration and relaxation of motor task sets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Often the performance of a task does not only require the processing of certain stimuli in certain ways, but also certain patterns of interlimb coordination. We studied shifts between different tasks involving different patterns of intermanual coupling by means of the timed-response procedure, which allows to trace state variables related to task sets. The tasks required the production of rapid bimanual reversal movements with symmetric or parallel directions. Symmetric movements are associated with symmetric coupling, as indicated by positive intermanual correlations between the directions of left-hand and right-hand movements, whereas parallel movements are associated with parallel coupling, as indicated by negative intermanual correlations. Task switches were associated with gradual changes of the intermanual correlations, which indicate the state of intermanual coupling as a major ingredient of a task set, in the course of action preparation. At short preparation intervals intermanual correlations were those appropriate for the preceding trial; with increasing preparation time they were replaced by those appropriate for the current trial, but the influence of the preceding trial did not disappear completely. In-between trials, intermanual coupling drifted toward a symmetric coupling, but not to uncoupled limbs. After a change of the task the specification of movement directions was slowed, but its initiation was not delayed. According to these results, task sets relax toward attractors which can be different from the absence of task sets. They are gradually configured during task preparation with a persistent influence of the preceding task, and the specification of response characteristics does not wait until the configuration of the new task set is completed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà, & M. Moscovitch (Eds.). Attention and Performance XV (pp. 421-452). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, E. M. (2002). Functional decay of memory for tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 287-297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance. The description of human tasks. Orlando: Academic. .

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert , S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gusnard, D. A., & Raichle, M. E. (2001). Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 685-694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, S., Anderson, G. J., & Kramer, A. F. (2003). Multidimensional set switching. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 503-509.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hening, W., Favilla, M., & Ghez, C. (1988). Trajectory control in targeted force impulses. V. Gradual specification of response amplitude. Experimental Brain Research, 71, 116-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H. (1996). Coordination. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action: Vol. 2. Motor skills (pp. 121-180). London: Academic Press.

  • Heuer, H., & Klein, W. (2006). The modulation of intermanual interactions during the specification of the directions of bimanual movements. Experimental Brain Research, 169, 162-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H., & Klein, W. (in press). The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions. Psychological Research.

  • Heuer, H., & Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Transfer of learning among motor patterns with different relative timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 241-252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H., Spijkers, W., Kleinsorge, T., van der Loo, H., & Steglich, C. (1998). The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes. Experimental Brain Research, 118, 381-392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., Spijkers, W., & Steglich, C. (2001). Static and phasic cross-talk effects in discrete bimanual reversal movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 67-85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. A. S., Tuller, B., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Fowler, C. A. (1984). Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbation during speech: Evidence for coordinative structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 812-832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsorge, T., Gajewski, P. D., & Heuer, H. (2005). Task sets under reconstruction: Effects of partially incorrect precues. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 521-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N. (1996). The reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merz, F., & Kalveram, K.-Th. (1965). Kritik der Differenzierungshypothese der Intelligenz. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie, 117, 287-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134-140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nairne, J. S., Whieman, H. L., & Kelley, M. R. (1999). Short-term forgetting of order under conditions of reduced interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 241-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrig, S., Kazennikov, O., & Wiesendanger, M. (1999). Time structure of a goal-directed bimanual skill and its dependence on task constraints. Behavioural Brain Research, 103, 95-104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2005). Switching of response modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1325-1338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtke, V., & Heuer, H. (1997). Task integration as a factor in secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychological Research, 60, 53-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, J. F., & Becker, J. A. M. (1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 27, 143-153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, D. E. (1991). Distance and location assimilation effects in rapid bimanual movement. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 302-308.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: Specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96, 207-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steglich, C. (2002). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur bimanuellen Koordination als transiente Kopplung bei der Richtungsspezifikation. Unpublished dissertation, RWTH Aachen.

  • Vetter, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000a). The CNS updates its context estimate in the absence of feedback. Neuroreport, 17, 3783-3786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2000b). Context estimation of sensorimotor control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 1026-1034.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herbert Heuer.

Additional information

The research reported in this paper was supported by grant He 1187/14-1 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We thank Barbara Herbst, Holger Küper, Kevin Schepers, and Elisei Rotaro for their support in running the experiment.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T. & Klein, W. The configuration and relaxation of motor task sets. Psychological Research 71, 503–515 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0069-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-006-0069-z

Keywords

Navigation